Miami 2001 would have trampled - I'm using the word TRAMPLED - 2005 Texas. 1991 probably would have too.
Say what you will about 1991 Miami, their defense was stingy af and didn't give up points.
The team that led the nation in rushing, was third in total offense and third in scoring never got inside the Miami 20-yard line, ran for only 82 yards and gained 171 yards in total offense.
Not top 25? What are you smoking ese?
The historic computer rankings play out my narrative objectively. UW's strength of record is way better.
Here is just one link to one system you're probably familiar with, through the 2012 season.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
Jesus tittay fucking Christ OBK. 91 Washington would have curb stomped any team in the history of Oregon by 14 pts or more.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
Jesus tittay fucking Christ OBK. 91 Washington would have curb stomped any team in the history of Oregon by 14 pts or more.
2010 Oregon wins rather easily. 2014 Oregon wins too.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
Jesus tittay fucking Christ OBK. 91 Washington would have curb stomped any team in the history of Oregon by 14 pts or more.
2010 Oregon wins rather easily. 2014 Oregon wins too.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
Jesus tittay fucking Christ OBK. 91 Washington would have curb stomped any team in the history of Oregon by 14 pts or more.
2010 Oregon wins rather easily. 2014 Oregon wins too.
Jesus.You are deranged.
3-star Stan Empterman would have snapped every single skill player for Oregon in half. Then pissed on their lifeless bodies just for fun.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
2001 UM at #7 and UW 91 at #23?
Complete piece of shit pole, totally laughable, fuck off and die to whomever was dumb enough to have their stupid name associated with it.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids.
Not sure why the 1888 Yale team is so low. If you look at their tape, the defense is better than even their numbers suggested.
For real though. 0 PA the entire season
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
Jesus tittay fucking Christ OBK. 91 Washington would have curb stomped any team in the history of Oregon by 14 pts or more.
2010 Oregon wins rather easily. 2014 Oregon wins too.
Shut the fuck up.
WSU doesn't have a horse in this race. Go back to your Pullman apartment and call it a night, cooglet.
Miami 2001 would have trampled - I'm using the word TRAMPLED - 2005 Texas. 1991 probably would have too.
Say what you will about 1991 Miami, their defense was stingy af and didn't give up points.
The team that led the nation in rushing, was third in total offense and third in scoring never got inside the Miami 20-yard line, ran for only 82 yards and gained 171 yards in total offense.
Not top 25? What are you smoking ese?
The historic computer rankings play out my narrative objectively. UW's strength of record is way better.
Here is just one link to one system you're probably familiar with, through the 2012 season.
Way better than what? Are we comparing 1991 UW to 1991 Miami? Because their respective SOS that season was comparable.
If you're linking me to some fucking computer model that ranks the best teams across years based on some algo, save it. It's as good as the guy who made it up and is no better at licking your finger, holding it in the wind and making an assessment based on judgment.
My comment was to your comment that 1991 Miami isn't even top 25, which is an absurd position. They belong there over 2000 Oklahoma, as but one example, rather easily. There aren't many defenses that could hold Nebraska under 100 yards rushing for a game back in those days. You can argue all you want about UW 1991 belonging in the top 10; you won't get any argument from me. But throwing Miami 1991 under the bus and out of the Top 25 to make your point is FS because their schedules weren't all that different and their common opponents make the comparison a little muddy.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
2001 UM at #7 and UW 91 at #23?
Complete piece of shit pole, totally laughable, fuck off and die to whomever was dumb enough to have their stupid name associated with it.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids.
It's a USC / Bama /Oklahoma fuck fest. Give me a break.
1988 Notre Dame? Sure they won the title but all fucking time? They needed a complete shit call that the whole world knows about to keep from losing at home. Fuck those guys.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids.
What's comical is a school that's never played in the big game once, thinking they can run with the big dogs. Thinking their program is more elite than a school that's played in 9% of the BCS/Playoff era championship games.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids.
What's comical is a school that's never played in the big game once, thinking they can run with the big dogs. Thinking their program is more elite than a school that's played in 9% of the BCS/Playoff era championship games.
GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids.
What's comical is a school that's never played in the big game once, thinking they can run with the big dogs. Thinking their program is more elite than a school that's played in 9% of the BCS/Playoff era championship games.
See what I mean?
lol
Everyone can see our? crystal football with their own eyes. They can also see your envy. So fuck off.
Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!
Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!
Even doogs understand (but will never admit) that voted natties are not equal to those won on a field over the course of what is now a 15 game season for whoever wins the championship. You need to take a long, hard look in the mirror if you don't get it. I don't really care if that pisses off a bunch of troogs and doogs beating their chests over voted 'wins' from a bygone era when championship games never existed. 12-0 UW from 1991 = 12-0 Oregon from 2010. Had you played and lost to Miami, there would be no natty for you. But you never had to play the game. That's why the voted half natty is a joke.
Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!
Even doogs understand (but will never admit) that voted natties are not equal to those won on a field over the course of what is now a 15 game season for whoever wins the championship. You need to take a long, hard look in the mirror if you don't get it. I don't really care if that pisses off a bunch of troogs and doogs beating their chests over voted 'wins' from a bygone era when championship games never existed. 12-0 UW from 1991 = 12-0 Oregon from 2010. Had you played and lost to Miami, there would be no natty for you. But you never had to play the game. That's why the voted half natty is a joke.
Fine. I will meet @creepycoug at 7 - 11 and whip his ass and settle this thing once and for all.
Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
Comments
Here is just one link to one system you're probably familiar with, through the 2012 season.
https://www.huskermax.com/rating.html
3-star Stan Empterman would have snapped every single skill player for Oregon in half. Then pissed on their lifeless bodies just for fun.
And then lit them on fire.
HTH
Complete piece of shit pole, totally laughable, fuck off and die to whomever was dumb enough to have their stupid name associated with it.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids.
If you're linking me to some fucking computer model that ranks the best teams across years based on some algo, save it. It's as good as the guy who made it up and is no better at licking your finger, holding it in the wind and making an assessment based on judgment.
My comment was to your comment that 1991 Miami isn't even top 25, which is an absurd position. They belong there over 2000 Oklahoma, as but one example, rather easily. There aren't many defenses that could hold Nebraska under 100 yards rushing for a game back in those days. You can argue all you want about UW 1991 belonging in the top 10; you won't get any argument from me. But throwing Miami 1991 under the bus and out of the Top 25 to make your point is FS because their schedules weren't all that different and their common opponents make the comparison a little muddy.
1988 Notre Dame? Sure they won the title but all fucking time? They needed a complete shit call that the whole world knows about to keep from losing at home. Fuck those guys.
lol
Everyone can see our? crystal football with their own eyes. They can also see your envy. So fuck off.