Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Elizabeth Warren endorses sending the economy into a severe recession in 2020

1235

Comments

  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,012
    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542
    GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755

    GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
    GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500

    HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?


    Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
    Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.

    HondoFS.

    Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,638 Founders Club
    TheKobeStopper said:

    RaceBannon said:

    And yet the subject is another democratic front runner who is an economic moron

    But but but


    I would say the people voting for the party that has, over and over again, been responsible for recessions are the economic morons.

    But hey, it’s not like you’re Race Bannon and have ever cared about results. No, just make up a bunch of excuses for why the results don’t matter. That’s what doogs like you always do.
    That party has also been responsible for all the growth just like now

    Nobody made more excuses than Obama

    Nobody has a worse plan than the folks you vote for

    This isn't even a good effort on your part. Hondo level

    Good job
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542
    GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755

    GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
    GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500

    HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?


    Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
    Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.

    HondoFS.

    Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.


    Complete fucking travesty that Hondo's vote counts just as much as yours or mine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542
    GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755

    GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
    GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500

    HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?


    Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
    Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.

    HondoFS.

    Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.


    Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,638 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542
    GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755

    GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
    GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500

    HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?


    Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
    Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.

    HondoFS.

    Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.


    Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
    Your entire replies were irrelevant

    Reagan had growth that Obama never hit in the same area code of
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542
    GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755

    GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
    GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500

    HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?


    Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
    Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.

    HondoFS.

    Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.


    Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
    Your entire replies were irrelevant

    Reagan had growth that Obama never hit in the same area code of
    Ok old man Race.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,012
    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542
    GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755

    GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
    GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500

    HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?


    Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
    Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.

    HondoFS.

    Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.


    Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
    Its only irrelevant if you are a HondoFS moron. For people with an IQ over the speed limit it is understood at part of the discussion.

    Shouldn't you be off in a corner stacking blocks or something?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,600 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542
    GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755

    GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
    GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500

    HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?


    Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
    Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.

    HondoFS.

    Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.


    Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
    Your entire replies were irrelevant

    Reagan had growth that Obama never hit in the same area code of
    Ok old man Race.
    HondoFS finally gets something factually correct.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,638 Founders Club
    Meanwhile Trump has built 500 miles of wall with couch change

    Crossings cut in half because Trump got Mexico to roam their southern border and stop the riff raff at the source

    Record employment for Blacks and Hispanics

    Employment, wages, and growth up for everyone

    But sure, the fake fucking lying Indian is going to save us from all this by plunging us into the dark ages


    All the smart kids are voting for her
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    Meanwhile Trump has built 500 miles of wall with couch change

    Crossings cut in half because Trump got Mexico to roam their southern border and stop the riff raff at the source

    Record employment for Blacks and Hispanics

    Employment, wages, and growth up for everyone

    But sure, the fake fucking lying Indian is going to save us from all this by plunging us into the dark ages


    All the smart kids are voting for her

    Race is a model of honesty for sure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter