What is embarrassing is endorsing ending all fracking and thus doubling the cost of gasoline and LNG. For some reason Hondo likes being Putin's bitch. Keep rooting for the away team.
And yet the subject is another democratic front runner who is an economic moron
But but but
I would say the people voting for the party that has, over and over again, been responsible for recessions are the economic morons.
But hey, it’s not like you’re Race Bannon and have ever cared about results. No, just make up a bunch of excuses for why the results don’t matter. That’s what doogs like you always do.
The last recession was a result of the housing bubble and mandated lower lending standards. All supported by dems who crushed any attempts to reform the process. The rescission was then extended and the recovery weak because of barry putting a governor on the economic throttle - taxes and regulation. Who was the moron that said we can't drill our way to lower energy prices? Here is a hint, it wasn't Palin.
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542 GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466 GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
My maff is exactly correct. There's no 'feels' in maff.
1.1 Trillion/1 Trillion equals exactly a 10% increase.
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542 GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466 GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
Comments
Race knows maff.
You already do blame Obama for 2009.
I would say the people voting for the party that has, over and over again, been responsible for recessions are the economic morons.
But hey, it’s not like you’re Race Bannon and have ever cared about results. No, just make up a bunch of excuses for why the results don’t matter. That’s what doogs like you always do.
GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
1.1 Trillion/1 Trillion equals exactly a 10% increase.
So fuck thyself off.