Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Elizabeth Warren endorses sending the economy into a severe recession in 2020

2

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Q
    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    "None under Carter".

    Are you paid to be this stupid?

    STFU the adults are talking.
    Any more C Corp knowledge to drop on us?
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,951
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    Only HondoFS can shill for Carter’s economic record...
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 100,717
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 100,717
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on


  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on


    Embarrassing.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on


    Is that the area code where Reagan lived in the house where Newsome now lives?
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,658
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary

    Name the last republican president that didn’t have a recession.

    It's hard hitting analysis and questions like this that make me respekt team #hondobros.
    Stop dodging and answer the question.

    And Trump hasn’t completed his first term (we all know a recession is coming) so he doesn’t count.
    I see you are resorting to the HondoBro/FSBob classic "Answer the question!#!@#"

    Shooting for the stars.

    Economic cycles lag political cycles, hth. Or do we now get to blame Obama for the 2009 financial crisis?
    That’s. The. Joke.

    You already do blame Obama for 2009.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment First Anniversary

    And yet the subject is another democratic front runner who is an economic moron

    But but but


    I would say the people voting for the party that has, over and over again, been responsible for recessions are the economic morons.

    But hey, it’s not like you’re Race Bannon and have ever cared about results. No, just make up a bunch of excuses for why the results don’t matter. That’s what doogs like you always do.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,658
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,951
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542
    GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755

    GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
    GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500

    HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?


  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,658
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    My maff is exactly correct. There's no 'feels' in maff.

    1.1 Trillion/1 Trillion equals exactly a 10% increase.

    So fuck thyself off.



  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on

    Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
    Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
    And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
    Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.

    Race knows maff.

    So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
    I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.

    Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
    GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542
    GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755

    GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466
    GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500

    HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?


    Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
Sign In or Register to comment.