Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542 GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466 GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.
HondoFS.
Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.
And yet the subject is another democratic front runner who is an economic moron
But but but
I would say the people voting for the party that has, over and over again, been responsible for recessions are the economic morons.
But hey, it’s not like you’re Race Bannon and have ever cared about results. No, just make up a bunch of excuses for why the results don’t matter. That’s what doogs like you always do.
That party has also been responsible for all the growth just like now
Nobody made more excuses than Obama
Nobody has a worse plan than the folks you vote for
This isn't even a good effort on your part. Hondo level
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542 GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466 GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.
HondoFS.
Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.
Complete fucking travesty that Hondo's vote counts just as much as yours or mine.
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542 GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466 GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.
HondoFS.
Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.
Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542 GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466 GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.
HondoFS.
Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.
Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
Your entire replies were irrelevant
Reagan had growth that Obama never hit in the same area code of
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542 GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466 GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.
HondoFS.
Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.
Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
Your entire replies were irrelevant
Reagan had growth that Obama never hit in the same area code of
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542 GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466 GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.
HondoFS.
Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.
Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
Its only irrelevant if you are a HondoFS moron. For people with an IQ over the speed limit it is understood at part of the discussion.
Shouldn't you be off in a corner stacking blocks or something?
Reagan has growth rates that Obama never even got in the same area code on
Reagan also got unemployment rates Obama never even got in same area code on. Your point race?
Reagan had growth rates that Obama never got in the same area code on
And China has growth rates that would embarrass Reagan. Again. You have no point Race.
Going from $1 to $2 is 100% growth. Going from $1 Trillion to $1.1 Trillion is only a 10% growth rate.
Race knows maff.
So growth matters except for China. Cause they are like .000001% the size of America. Brilliant analysis.
I know. It's hard to dumb it down for you.
Given that China is more than half the US GDP and around 75%, I feel your maff is wrong. So you can strut around all you want but you still look dumb. Got it pookie?
GDP per capita USA 2018: $54,542 GDP per capita China 2018: $7,755
GDP per capita 2010 USA $48,466 GDP per capita 2010 China $4,500
HondoFS. You are a moron. It is embarrassing. I'd recommend turning off your computer and turning on something more your level...say NickJr?
Throbber point had nothing to do with GDP per capita idiot.
Yes, the population of a country has no impact on the size of its GDP.
HondoFS.
Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.
Can you even read? I didn't say it didn't matter. I just said it's irrelevant to the point throbber was making. Idiot.
Your entire replies were irrelevant
Reagan had growth that Obama never hit in the same area code of
Meanwhile Trump has built 500 miles of wall with couch change
Crossings cut in half because Trump got Mexico to roam their southern border and stop the riff raff at the source
Record employment for Blacks and Hispanics
Employment, wages, and growth up for everyone
But sure, the fake fucking lying Indian is going to save us from all this by plunging us into the dark ages
All the smart kids are voting for her
Race is a model of honesty for sure.
Your inability to even find some of your bullshit graphs to dispute anything I said is noted
LOL. I bet my buddy it would take less than 5 minutes for some meat head to come back with NO factual arguments, but make this a personal thing or some BS about people being too "PC."
Yeah other than GDP is an accumulation of everyone's income. Easier to have 10% per capita income on $5,000 of income than on $50,000 of income. Geezus you love the chicoms. Keep rooting for the away team.
Comments
HondoFS.
Shoutout to GDS, insincereDawg, CirrohisoftheBrain, Thomas, and the rest of you Liberals...remember. This guy agrees with you.
Nobody made more excuses than Obama
Nobody has a worse plan than the folks you vote for
This isn't even a good effort on your part. Hondo level
Good job
Reagan had growth that Obama never hit in the same area code of
Shouldn't you be off in a corner stacking blocks or something?
Crossings cut in half because Trump got Mexico to roam their southern border and stop the riff raff at the source
Record employment for Blacks and Hispanics
Employment, wages, and growth up for everyone
But sure, the fake fucking lying Indian is going to save us from all this by plunging us into the dark ages
All the smart kids are voting for her
I WON THE BET! THANK YOU!