Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
New board moto
Comments
-
I said “part of the reason” you idiot.Houhusky said:
We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...GOAT said:Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth
Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama
UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
-
We didn’t lose because of one thing. I said recruiting is part of the reason we lost, which is true.bananasnblondes said:
We have outrecruited cal in literally every position group over the last 5 years.GOAT said:Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth
We lost because our players were weak-minded and our coaches did not have a winning gameplan -
And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.GOAT said:
I said “part of the reason” you idiot.Houhusky said:
We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...GOAT said:Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth
Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama
UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
(insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)
On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song. -
How is it not part of the reason? If you don’t think it’s even part of the reason you’re more retarded than I thought. We don’t lose that game if we have Stephen Carr, Wyatt Davis, D.J. Johnson, Marlon Tuli, Tyler Vaughns, Michael Pittman etc.Houhusky said:
And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.GOAT said:
I said “part of the reason” you idiot.Houhusky said:
We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...GOAT said:Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth
Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama
UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
(insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)
On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song. -
The 15,000 other fuckups > than some hypothetical savior recruitsGOAT said:
How is it not part of the reason? If you don’t think it’s even part of the reason you’re more retarded than I thought. We don’t lose that game if we have Stephen Carr, Wyatt Davis, D.J. Johnson, Marlon Tuli, Tyler Vaughns, Michael Pittman etc.Houhusky said:
And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.GOAT said:
I said “part of the reason” you idiot.Houhusky said:
We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...GOAT said:Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth
Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama
UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
(insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)
On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
nice to know that when you tried to backtrack/clarify by saying "part of the reason" you meant if we had a few specific recruits UW would have won though. -
Our significantly higher rated guys couldn’t beat Cal’s significantly lower rated lower recruits but if we had these other significantly higher rated guys we can know we wouldn’t have lost.GOAT said:
How is it not part of the reason? If you don’t think it’s even part of the reason you’re more retarded than I thought. We don’t lose that game if we have Stephen Carr, Wyatt Davis, D.J. Johnson, Marlon Tuli, Tyler Vaughns, Michael Pittman etc.Houhusky said:
And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.GOAT said:
I said “part of the reason” you idiot.Houhusky said:
We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...GOAT said:Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth
Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama
UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
(insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)
On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
You don’t see any holes in this? -
I’m fine with criticizing recruiting and pointing out some holes in the roster.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Disagree to a point. There are some holes in the roster from recruiting failures, particularly at linebacker. I'm not starfucking, don't twist.dnc said:
HR, YKHouhusky said:
We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...GOAT said:Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth
Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama
UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
The narrative that this had anything at all to do with recruiting is so incredibly FS it’s nit even worth addressing.
It’s self parody at this point.
But we lost that game due to a. Significantly under executing the talent level (particularly at WR - those receivers have never played so poorly) b. Poor game planning/in game coaching on both sides of the ball. c. Getting completely fucked by the two and a half hour delay on a game that already started too late.
A is just as possible with higher end talent because of C. Massive deviations from normal conditions are great equalizers and play into the hands of the underdogs (see also WSU outscoring us while it was actually snowing last year).
Higher end recruits wouldn’t have saved that flat performance on the field or the sidelines, nor would they have held off the storm.
Recruiting failures may lose us a game later this year (if we lose to SC or Stanford it will almost certainly be a big factor). It wasn’t the issue Sunday morning. -
Thisdnc said:
I’m fine with criticizing recruiting and pointing out some holes in the roster.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Disagree to a point. There are some holes in the roster from recruiting failures, particularly at linebacker. I'm not starfucking, don't twist.dnc said:
HR, YKHouhusky said:
We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...GOAT said:Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth
Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama
UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
The narrative that this had anything at all to do with recruiting is so incredibly FS it’s nit even worth addressing.
It’s self parody at this point.
But we lost that game due to a. Significantly under executing the talent level (particularly at WR - those receivers have never played so poorly) b. Poor game planning/in game coaching on both sides of the ball. c. Getting completely fucked by the two and a half hour delay on a game that already started too late.
A is just as possible with higher end talent because of C. Massive deviations from normal conditions are great equalizers and play into the hands of the underdogs (see also WSU outscoring us while it was actually snowing last year).
Higher end recruits wouldn’t have saved that flat performance on the field or the sidelines, nor would they have held off the storm.
Recruiting failures may lose us a game later this year (if we lose to SC or Stanford it will almost certainly be a big factor). It wasn’t the issue Sunday morning. -
We agree more than we don't.dnc said:
I’m fine with criticizing recruiting and pointing out some holes in the roster.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Disagree to a point. There are some holes in the roster from recruiting failures, particularly at linebacker. I'm not starfucking, don't twist.dnc said:
HR, YKHouhusky said:
We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...GOAT said:Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth
Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama
UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
The narrative that this had anything at all to do with recruiting is so incredibly FS it’s nit even worth addressing.
It’s self parody at this point.
But we lost that game due to a. Significantly under executing the talent level (particularly at WR - those receivers have never played so poorly) b. Poor game planning/in game coaching on both sides of the ball. c. Getting completely fucked by the two and a half hour delay on a game that already started too late.
A is just as possible with higher end talent because of C. Massive deviations from normal conditions are great equalizers and play into the hands of the underdogs (see also WSU outscoring us while it was actually snowing last year).
Higher end recruits wouldn’t have saved that flat performance on the field or the sidelines, nor would they have held off the storm.
Recruiting failures may lose us a game later this year (if we lose to SC or Stanford it will almost certainly be a big factor). It wasn’t the issue Sunday morning.
-
How come the 2.5 hour delay didn’t affect Cal?
