Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

New board moto

2

Comments

  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,276
    jecornel said:

    Mad_Son said:

    jecornel said:

    Just think if this UW defense had Evan Weaver in the middle. Shit.

    How the hell did the dawgs not offer? White guy...check.. 3 star.....check....shit offers.....check.

    He literally fits the model of Gregory recruits......Had Evan been from Texas or Idaho he gets an offer!!!

    Imagine THAT!

    huh?
    Evan Weaver is a winner maaaan. He calls hist shots and delivers as the broadcast had mentioned probably dozen times Sunday morning.

    At the time, this bored would have gone absolutely nuts if we had lost Amandre to the Ducks or something and had to settle for Weaver. The Weaver hand-wringing, at this point, is all hindsight 20/20 shit just like a couple years ago when a few people were going crazy that we didnt offer Hercules or Cooper Cupp.

    It should also be noted that we may have had both BBK and Jordan Miller had we not chosen to play them as freshmen for no reason
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    jecornel said:

    Mad_Son said:

    jecornel said:

    Just think if this UW defense had Evan Weaver in the middle. Shit.

    How the hell did the dawgs not offer? White guy...check.. 3 star.....check....shit offers.....check.

    He literally fits the model of Gregory recruits......Had Evan been from Texas or Idaho he gets an offer!!!

    Imagine THAT!

    huh?
    Evan Weaver is a winner maaaan. He calls hist shots and delivers as the broadcast had mentioned probably dozen times Sunday morning.

    At the time, this bored would have gone absolutely nuts if we had lost Amandre to the Ducks or something and had to settle for Weaver. The Weaver hand-wringing, at this point, is all hindsight 20/20 shit just like a couple years ago when a few people were going crazy that we didnt offer Hercules or Cooper Cupp.

    It should also be noted that we may have had both BBK and Jordan Miller had we not chosen to play them as freshmen for no reason
    Eifler looks pretty good at Illinois, just saying
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,179
    jecornel said:

    Mad_Son said:

    jecornel said:

    Just think if this UW defense had Evan Weaver in the middle. Shit.

    How the hell did the dawgs not offer? White guy...check.. 3 star.....check....shit offers.....check.

    He literally fits the model of Gregory recruits......Had Evan been from Texas or Idaho he gets an offer!!!

    Imagine THAT!

    huh?
    Evan Weaver is a winner maaaan. He calls hist shots and delivers as the broadcast had mentioned probably dozen times Sunday morning.

    That was a link to the thread that says we offered him.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    HR, YK

    The narrative that this had anything at all to do with recruiting is so incredibly FS it’s nit even worth addressing.

    It’s self parody at this point.
    Disagree to a point. There are some holes in the roster from recruiting failures, particularly at linebacker. I'm not starfucking, don't twist.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Coaching cost us the game. The offensive play calling was great at the red zone as always and fucking defense decided to spread their legs open like some prostitute
  • jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,727
    Mad_Son said:

    jecornel said:

    Mad_Son said:

    jecornel said:

    Just think if this UW defense had Evan Weaver in the middle. Shit.

    How the hell did the dawgs not offer? White guy...check.. 3 star.....check....shit offers.....check.

    He literally fits the model of Gregory recruits......Had Evan been from Texas or Idaho he gets an offer!!!

    Imagine THAT!

    huh?
    Evan Weaver is a winner maaaan. He calls hist shots and delivers as the broadcast had mentioned probably dozen times Sunday morning.

    That was a link to the thread that says we offered him.
    Ah, gotcha. 247 doesn't show a UW offer.
  • Homebrew_DawgHomebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,650
    Pete recruits mentally weak boys, and makes them eunuchs.
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited September 2019
    FirePete said:

    jecornel said:

    Mad_Son said:

    jecornel said:

    Just think if this UW defense had Evan Weaver in the middle. Shit.

    How the hell did the dawgs not offer? White guy...check.. 3 star.....check....shit offers.....check.

    He literally fits the model of Gregory recruits......Had Evan been from Texas or Idaho he gets an offer!!!

    Imagine THAT!

    huh?
    Evan Weaver is a winner maaaan. He calls hist shots and delivers as the broadcast had mentioned probably dozen times Sunday morning.

    At the time, this bored would have gone absolutely nuts if we had lost Amandre to the Ducks or something and had to settle for Weaver. The Weaver hand-wringing, at this point, is all hindsight 20/20 shit just like a couple years ago when a few people were going crazy that we didnt offer Hercules or Cooper Cupp.

    It should also be noted that we may have had both BBK and Jordan Miller had we not chosen to play them as freshmen for no reason
    Eifler looks pretty good at Illinois, just saying
    The Redshirting and roster management is about as shitty as Petes late game clock management.
  • Homebrew_DawgHomebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,650
    Houhusky said:

    FirePete said:

    jecornel said:

    Mad_Son said:

    jecornel said:

    Just think if this UW defense had Evan Weaver in the middle. Shit.

    How the hell did the dawgs not offer? White guy...check.. 3 star.....check....shit offers.....check.

    He literally fits the model of Gregory recruits......Had Evan been from Texas or Idaho he gets an offer!!!

    Imagine THAT!

    huh?
    Evan Weaver is a winner maaaan. He calls hist shots and delivers as the broadcast had mentioned probably dozen times Sunday morning.

    At the time, this bored would have gone absolutely nuts if we had lost Amandre to the Ducks or something and had to settle for Weaver. The Weaver hand-wringing, at this point, is all hindsight 20/20 shit just like a couple years ago when a few people were going crazy that we didnt offer Hercules or Cooper Cupp.

    It should also be noted that we may have had both BBK and Jordan Miller had we not chosen to play them as freshmen for no reason
    Eifler looks pretty good at Illinois, just saying
    The Redshirting and roster management is about as shitty as Petes late game clock management.
    This is because Pete doesn't deviate from his own process. So if a player hasn't had enough reps in practice, they don't play. It FS.
  • GOATGOAT Member Posts: 177
    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
  • GOATGOAT Member Posts: 177

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We have outrecruited cal in literally every position group over the last 5 years.

    We lost because our players were weak-minded and our coaches did not have a winning gameplan
    We didn’t lose because of one thing. I said recruiting is part of the reason we lost, which is true.
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited September 2019
    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
    And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.

    (insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)

    On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
  • GOATGOAT Member Posts: 177
    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
    And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.

    (insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)

    On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
    How is it not part of the reason? If you don’t think it’s even part of the reason you’re more retarded than I thought. We don’t lose that game if we have Stephen Carr, Wyatt Davis, D.J. Johnson, Marlon Tuli, Tyler Vaughns, Michael Pittman etc.
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
    And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.

    (insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)

    On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
    How is it not part of the reason? If you don’t think it’s even part of the reason you’re more retarded than I thought. We don’t lose that game if we have Stephen Carr, Wyatt Davis, D.J. Johnson, Marlon Tuli, Tyler Vaughns, Michael Pittman etc.
    The 15,000 other fuckups > than some hypothetical savior recruits

    nice to know that when you tried to backtrack/clarify by saying "part of the reason" you meant if we had a few specific recruits UW would have won though.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,986 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    HR, YK

    The narrative that this had anything at all to do with recruiting is so incredibly FS it’s nit even worth addressing.

    It’s self parody at this point.
    Disagree to a point. There are some holes in the roster from recruiting failures, particularly at linebacker. I'm not starfucking, don't twist.
    I’m fine with criticizing recruiting and pointing out some holes in the roster.

    But we lost that game due to a. Significantly under executing the talent level (particularly at WR - those receivers have never played so poorly) b. Poor game planning/in game coaching on both sides of the ball. c. Getting completely fucked by the two and a half hour delay on a game that already started too late.

    A is just as possible with higher end talent because of C. Massive deviations from normal conditions are great equalizers and play into the hands of the underdogs (see also WSU outscoring us while it was actually snowing last year).

    Higher end recruits wouldn’t have saved that flat performance on the field or the sidelines, nor would they have held off the storm.

    Recruiting failures may lose us a game later this year (if we lose to SC or Stanford it will almost certainly be a big factor). It wasn’t the issue Sunday morning.
    This
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    HR, YK

    The narrative that this had anything at all to do with recruiting is so incredibly FS it’s nit even worth addressing.

    It’s self parody at this point.
    Disagree to a point. There are some holes in the roster from recruiting failures, particularly at linebacker. I'm not starfucking, don't twist.
    I’m fine with criticizing recruiting and pointing out some holes in the roster.

    But we lost that game due to a. Significantly under executing the talent level (particularly at WR - those receivers have never played so poorly) b. Poor game planning/in game coaching on both sides of the ball. c. Getting completely fucked by the two and a half hour delay on a game that already started too late.

    A is just as possible with higher end talent because of C. Massive deviations from normal conditions are great equalizers and play into the hands of the underdogs (see also WSU outscoring us while it was actually snowing last year).

    Higher end recruits wouldn’t have saved that flat performance on the field or the sidelines, nor would they have held off the storm.

    Recruiting failures may lose us a game later this year (if we lose to SC or Stanford it will almost certainly be a big factor). It wasn’t the issue Sunday morning.
    We agree more than we don't.

  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,806 Standard Supporter
    How come the 2.5 hour delay didn’t affect Cal?
Sign In or Register to comment.