Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

New board moto

2»

Comments

  • GOAT
    GOAT Member Posts: 177
    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
  • GOAT
    GOAT Member Posts: 177

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We have outrecruited cal in literally every position group over the last 5 years.

    We lost because our players were weak-minded and our coaches did not have a winning gameplan
    We didn’t lose because of one thing. I said recruiting is part of the reason we lost, which is true.
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited September 2019
    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
    And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.

    (insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)

    On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
  • GOAT
    GOAT Member Posts: 177
    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
    And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.

    (insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)

    On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
    How is it not part of the reason? If you don’t think it’s even part of the reason you’re more retarded than I thought. We don’t lose that game if we have Stephen Carr, Wyatt Davis, D.J. Johnson, Marlon Tuli, Tyler Vaughns, Michael Pittman etc.
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
    And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.

    (insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)

    On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
    How is it not part of the reason? If you don’t think it’s even part of the reason you’re more retarded than I thought. We don’t lose that game if we have Stephen Carr, Wyatt Davis, D.J. Johnson, Marlon Tuli, Tyler Vaughns, Michael Pittman etc.
    The 15,000 other fuckups > than some hypothetical savior recruits

    nice to know that when you tried to backtrack/clarify by saying "part of the reason" you meant if we had a few specific recruits UW would have won though.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,156 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    HR, YK

    The narrative that this had anything at all to do with recruiting is so incredibly FS it’s nit even worth addressing.

    It’s self parody at this point.
    Disagree to a point. There are some holes in the roster from recruiting failures, particularly at linebacker. I'm not starfucking, don't twist.
    I’m fine with criticizing recruiting and pointing out some holes in the roster.

    But we lost that game due to a. Significantly under executing the talent level (particularly at WR - those receivers have never played so poorly) b. Poor game planning/in game coaching on both sides of the ball. c. Getting completely fucked by the two and a half hour delay on a game that already started too late.

    A is just as possible with higher end talent because of C. Massive deviations from normal conditions are great equalizers and play into the hands of the underdogs (see also WSU outscoring us while it was actually snowing last year).

    Higher end recruits wouldn’t have saved that flat performance on the field or the sidelines, nor would they have held off the storm.

    Recruiting failures may lose us a game later this year (if we lose to SC or Stanford it will almost certainly be a big factor). It wasn’t the issue Sunday morning.
    This
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    HR, YK

    The narrative that this had anything at all to do with recruiting is so incredibly FS it’s nit even worth addressing.

    It’s self parody at this point.
    Disagree to a point. There are some holes in the roster from recruiting failures, particularly at linebacker. I'm not starfucking, don't twist.
    I’m fine with criticizing recruiting and pointing out some holes in the roster.

    But we lost that game due to a. Significantly under executing the talent level (particularly at WR - those receivers have never played so poorly) b. Poor game planning/in game coaching on both sides of the ball. c. Getting completely fucked by the two and a half hour delay on a game that already started too late.

    A is just as possible with higher end talent because of C. Massive deviations from normal conditions are great equalizers and play into the hands of the underdogs (see also WSU outscoring us while it was actually snowing last year).

    Higher end recruits wouldn’t have saved that flat performance on the field or the sidelines, nor would they have held off the storm.

    Recruiting failures may lose us a game later this year (if we lose to SC or Stanford it will almost certainly be a big factor). It wasn’t the issue Sunday morning.
    We agree more than we don't.

  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,276
    How come the 2.5 hour delay didn’t affect Cal?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,148
    Sirmon at FB is baffling. The guy lacks physicality at LB. What would make him a good FB other than he can probably catch?
  • Avatarsare4fags
    Avatarsare4fags Member Posts: 125
    If our starting receivers had been catching balls from only Eason since January 2nd then I think we win this game. I know CP has a soft spot for beta NorCal QBs (he was one) but his stupid choice to give Haener reps cost us Sunday morning
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    whlinder said:

    How come the 2.5 hour delay didn’t affect Cal?

    Again, whacky conditions are an equalizer that always favors the underdog.

    It significantly lessened the HFA, for one thing.

    Not saying it didn’t impact Cal, don’t twist. But I guarantee you Wilcox was praying that game would still be played and as late as possible.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,156 Founders Club
    Yep abnormal events or weather favor the underdog

    Didn't bother bringing it up because this board

    Cal was better prepared for everything anyway

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    dnc said:

    whlinder said:

    How come the 2.5 hour delay didn’t affect Cal?

    Again, >whacky conditions are an equalizer that always favors the underdog.

    Not always.

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,339 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    dnc said:

    whlinder said:

    How come the 2.5 hour delay didn’t affect Cal?

    Again, whacky conditions are an equalizer that always favors the underdog.

    It significantly lessened the HFA, for one thing.

    Not saying it didn’t impact Cal, don’t twist. But I guarantee you Wilcox was praying that game would still be played and as late as possible.
    I know I was, and I'm a militant agnostic
    I cursed God after this game and I’m a militant atheist.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I'd give Pete somewhat of a pass on this. I know one loss in college football is much worse than any other sport, but that game was just strange in general. You had a 2 1/2 hour weather delay that basically sucked the life out of the stadium. The clock management at the end was laughable, he did the same crap against Ohio State in the Rose Bowl, and that notorious home game against Oregon (26-20 loss) as well. I know I'm throwing out the doog agenda (circumstances, young team, etc.) But given it being a late start with all the crap added to it, I'd suck it up and move on.
    Quick question, how was Cal able to win the game with all the life sucked out of the stadium?


  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840

    dnc said:

    whlinder said:

    How come the 2.5 hour delay didn’t affect Cal?

    Again, >whacky conditions are an equalizer that always favors the underdog.

    Not always.

    That’s the point.

    If not for snow, Leach would have taken Pete’s plunger like every other year.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    whlinder said:

    How come the 2.5 hour delay didn’t affect Cal?

    Again, >whacky conditions are an equalizer that always favors the underdog.

    Not always.

    That’s the point.

    If not for snow, Leach would have taken Pete’s plunger like every other year.
    Word your point better next time.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,551 Founders Club

    2023 will be special! Now I know why people get so hooked on TBS'ing. There's always the hope and allure of two years from now.

    "It is better to travel hopefully than to arrive."

    Robert Louis Stevenson, noted Doog
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840

    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    whlinder said:

    How come the 2.5 hour delay didn’t affect Cal?

    Again, >whacky conditions are an equalizer that always favors the underdog.

    Not always.

    That’s the point.

    If not for snow, Leach would have taken Pete’s plunger like every other year.
    Word your point better next time.
    I didn't need to since I already addressed this.

    Massive deviations from normal conditions are great equalizers and play into the hands of the underdogs (see also WSU outscoring us while it was actually snowing last year).


    Take responsibility for your own inability to follow a thread.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
    And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.

    (insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)

    On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
    How is it not part of the reason? If you don’t think it’s even part of the reason you’re more retarded than I thought. We don’t lose that game if we have Stephen Carr, Wyatt Davis, D.J. Johnson, Marlon Tuli, Tyler Vaughns, Michael Pittman etc.
    The 15,000 other fuckups > than some hypothetical savior recruits

    nice to know that when you tried to backtrack/clarify by saying "part of the reason" you meant if we had a few specific recruits UW would have won though.
    Thanks. You make so many insightful points and your opinion is so respected. I'll consider it.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Houhusky said:

    GOAT said:

    Part of the reason we lost is because of gaps in recruiting years ago. Hth

    We did not lose to fucking Cal because of recruiting...

    Its fucking Cal, not Ohio State or Alabama

    UW has a massive talent advantage and If Pete needs "more bullets" to beat fucking Cal than he isnt the guy.
    I said “part of the reason” you idiot.
    And I said its not part of any reason on why UW lost to Cal you smoothed brained mongoloid.

    (insert your inevitable retard butterfly effect type bullshit in response here)

    On the list of actual reasons why UW lost TO FUCKING CAL, recruiting is ranked somewhere between @DerekJohnson and his dad being at the stadium and the fact they removed gendered pronouns from the UW fight song.
    How is it not part of the reason? If you don’t think it’s even part of the reason you’re more retarded than I thought. We don’t lose that game if we have Stephen Carr, Wyatt Davis, D.J. Johnson, Marlon Tuli, Tyler Vaughns, Michael Pittman etc.
    The 15,000 other fuckups > than some hypothetical savior recruits

    nice to know that when you tried to backtrack/clarify by saying "part of the reason" you meant if we had a few specific recruits UW would have won though.
    Thanks. You make so many insightful points and your opinion is so respected. I'll consider it.
    Faggot!!!