The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Comments
-
You have got to be kidding me. No one, and I mean no one with any ounce of sense or decency that has read the Kyoto agreement from cover to cover can tell anyone it was only about MMGW. It was a power grab and everyone knows it. BO didn't even have the balls to sign his name to that garbage. When Bush failed to ratify the agreement it was because he knew we didn't want to be run by a bunch of failed socialist leaders. Hell, even Canada withdrew. Paris accord was even worse. Brilliant move by Trump to steer clear of that globalization garbage.Gwad said:Friends of Science (FoS) is a non-profit advocacy organization based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The organization rejects the established scientific conclusion that humans are largely responsible for the currently observed global warming. Rather, they propose that "the Sun is the main direct and indirect driver of climate change," not human activity. They argued against the Kyoto Protocol.[1] The society was founded in 2002 and launched its website in October of that year.[2][3] They are largely funded by the fossil fuel industry.[4][5]
-
Best plan is to find anything and everything on the planet that will burn and burn it as fast as possible. That is the best plan.
-
Brilliant comeback owl, just brilliant. Everyone was clearly talking about burning things.HustlinOwl said:Best plan is to find anything and everything on the planet that will burn and burn it as fast as possible. That is the best plan.
To the rest of the board: WTF did he mean? Anyone know? -
It's like when Otter asked Boone during Bluto's Pearl Harbor rant: "Germans?"Bendintheriver said:
Brilliant comeback owl, just brilliant. Everyone was clearly talking about burning things.HustlinOwl said:Best plan is to find anything and everything on the planet that will burn and burn it as fast as possible. That is the best plan.
To the rest of the board: WTF did he mean? Anyone know?
"Forget it, he's rolling."
-
Scientists can make an absolute boatload shilling for oil companies if they want.greenblood said:
ExactlyPurpleThrobber said:Ax yourself:
Your very existence is dependent on grant-funding and corporate or gubmint support to put food on the table. You have no appreciable job skills or other means of making money than 'research'. Take any topic - climate, agriculture, drug research....who cares? Same concept.
It is not logical to assume benevolence and truthiness uber alles. You gots to eat. Are you going to bite the hand that feeds you? Or your family? Remember - you can't do shit other than sit in a lab or interpret data. You can't swing a hammer, you can't close a deal, you can't produce a product.....
That 3% that aren't in your 97% consensus....maybe THAT'S the group that says "Fuck all" and isn't beholden to the Money Grab and are pure scientists for the science of it.
But that's not in the interest of the Money Grabbers....so you're considered a heretic.
And the crazy part is - the Money Grabbers sit on both the left and the right. They just have a comfort in either direction on who they want to whore out their 'science'.
It gets really hot. It gets really cold. Same as it ever was.
These scientist not only rely on funding for research, but also for wages as well. The climate change hysteria has to continue or a lot of these scientist are out of a job. -
Largely? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....effing moron. What's their annual revenue? $50K? $100K? They have very little funding...they are a bunch of scientists (mostly retired) that do it because they see the nonsense for what it is. One thing they aren't doing is getting rich off of the GW scam.Gwad said:Friends of Science (FoS) is a non-profit advocacy organization based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The organization rejects the established scientific conclusion that humans are largely responsible for the currently observed global warming. Rather, they propose that "the Sun is the main direct and indirect driver of climate change," not human activity. They argued against the Kyoto Protocol.[1] The society was founded in 2002 and launched its website in October of that year.[2][3] They are largely funded by the fossil fuel industry.[4][5]
Nice Wiki lookup...
Baaaaaa..... Sheep. Baaaaaa.....
-
great argument. Claim to be more informed about about an agreement than proceed to make absolutely no argument other than "socialism" and "globalization"Bendintheriver said:
You have got to be kidding me. No one, and I mean no one with any ounce of sense or decency that has read the Kyoto agreement from cover to cover can tell anyone it was only about MMGW. It was a power grab and everyone knows it. BO didn't even have the balls to sign his name to that garbage. When Bush failed to ratify the agreement it was because he knew we didn't want to be run by a bunch of failed socialist leaders. Hell, even Canada withdrew. Paris accord was even worse. Brilliant move by Trump to steer clear of that globalization garbage.Gwad said:Friends of Science (FoS) is a non-profit advocacy organization based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The organization rejects the established scientific conclusion that humans are largely responsible for the currently observed global warming. Rather, they propose that "the Sun is the main direct and indirect driver of climate change," not human activity. They argued against the Kyoto Protocol.[1] The society was founded in 2002 and launched its website in October of that year.[2][3] They are largely funded by the fossil fuel industry.[4][5]
Good job hitting all the buzzwords. -
Not really. The academia community is a lot like Hollywood, if you go against the liberal agenda you get blackballed.dhdawg said:
Scientists can make an absolute boatload shilling for oil companies if they want.greenblood said:
ExactlyPurpleThrobber said:Ax yourself:
Your very existence is dependent on grant-funding and corporate or gubmint support to put food on the table. You have no appreciable job skills or other means of making money than 'research'. Take any topic - climate, agriculture, drug research....who cares? Same concept.
It is not logical to assume benevolence and truthiness uber alles. You gots to eat. Are you going to bite the hand that feeds you? Or your family? Remember - you can't do shit other than sit in a lab or interpret data. You can't swing a hammer, you can't close a deal, you can't produce a product.....
That 3% that aren't in your 97% consensus....maybe THAT'S the group that says "Fuck all" and isn't beholden to the Money Grab and are pure scientists for the science of it.
But that's not in the interest of the Money Grabbers....so you're considered a heretic.
And the crazy part is - the Money Grabbers sit on both the left and the right. They just have a comfort in either direction on who they want to whore out their 'science'.
It gets really hot. It gets really cold. Same as it ever was.
These scientist not only rely on funding for research, but also for wages as well. The climate change hysteria has to continue or a lot of these scientist are out of a job. -
Yes it has nothing to do with science. It's all a conspiracy. Brilliant analysis.greenblood said:
Not really. The academia community is a lot like Hollywood, if you go against the liberal agenda you get blackballed.dhdawg said:
Scientists can make an absolute boatload shilling for oil companies if they want.greenblood said:
ExactlyPurpleThrobber said:Ax yourself:
Your very existence is dependent on grant-funding and corporate or gubmint support to put food on the table. You have no appreciable job skills or other means of making money than 'research'. Take any topic - climate, agriculture, drug research....who cares? Same concept.
It is not logical to assume benevolence and truthiness uber alles. You gots to eat. Are you going to bite the hand that feeds you? Or your family? Remember - you can't do shit other than sit in a lab or interpret data. You can't swing a hammer, you can't close a deal, you can't produce a product.....
That 3% that aren't in your 97% consensus....maybe THAT'S the group that says "Fuck all" and isn't beholden to the Money Grab and are pure scientists for the science of it.
But that's not in the interest of the Money Grabbers....so you're considered a heretic.
And the crazy part is - the Money Grabbers sit on both the left and the right. They just have a comfort in either direction on who they want to whore out their 'science'.
It gets really hot. It gets really cold. Same as it ever was.
These scientist not only rely on funding for research, but also for wages as well. The climate change hysteria has to continue or a lot of these scientist are out of a job. -
There's no money in academia. Industry will gladly hire or fund their "research"greenblood said:
Not really. The academia community is a lot like Hollywood, if you go against the liberal agenda you get blackballed.dhdawg said:
Scientists can make an absolute boatload shilling for oil companies if they want.greenblood said:
ExactlyPurpleThrobber said:Ax yourself:
Your very existence is dependent on grant-funding and corporate or gubmint support to put food on the table. You have no appreciable job skills or other means of making money than 'research'. Take any topic - climate, agriculture, drug research....who cares? Same concept.
It is not logical to assume benevolence and truthiness uber alles. You gots to eat. Are you going to bite the hand that feeds you? Or your family? Remember - you can't do shit other than sit in a lab or interpret data. You can't swing a hammer, you can't close a deal, you can't produce a product.....
That 3% that aren't in your 97% consensus....maybe THAT'S the group that says "Fuck all" and isn't beholden to the Money Grab and are pure scientists for the science of it.
But that's not in the interest of the Money Grabbers....so you're considered a heretic.
And the crazy part is - the Money Grabbers sit on both the left and the right. They just have a comfort in either direction on who they want to whore out their 'science'.
It gets really hot. It gets really cold. Same as it ever was.
These scientist not only rely on funding for research, but also for wages as well. The climate change hysteria has to continue or a lot of these scientist are out of a job.
