If you don't want to read that, his fortune was made selling a TV station and being on the Apple board. HTH
And for the book and the two movies and the speaking fees
Why so defensive? Lots of people get rich with religious scams. Quite common really
The article you linked was speculation on the graft he collected from Al Jazeera for a worthless TC network and Apple stock given to him.
He also lost tens of millions of dollars on green tech Nice to have a scam to fall back on
You think the book and speaking fees are material to his hundred plus million? Race you are better then that.
Again, I am amazed at your dishonesty or complete ignorance.
Al Gore received a butt load of free stock in a Silicon Valley venture capital firm (same with Apple and numerous other companies looking for more tax payer generosity). That firm invested 45 million into a company called Silver Springs Networks which was a company that had some type of hardware or software (not sure which) that made the power grid more efficient. BO invested 2.5 billion in grants to the energy sector. Guess who was given $305 million of that 2 billion? You guessed it, energy companies that all had contracts with Silver Springs Networks. Ahh yes, the insider gift that keeps on giving.
Al Gore was paid handsomely to do over 500 speeches (this is in a two year period just after the turn of the century) that dealt with one single solitary topic: Man made climate change. Guess what? Many government organizations paid him US Tax Dollars to speak on MMGW. Again, the insider gift that keeps on giving.
Gore took all this free money from tax payers and then invested it in many other green initiatives that would go on to rely upon tax payer dollars to kick of their programs. Another scam on the US taxpayer that ended up right in his pocket. If Hillary had been elected and all of the carbon limiting companies Gore had invested in had been funded by her using our tax dollars he would have been over a billionaire.
Suffice to say, your contention that Gore didn't make it off of MMGW is pure unadulterated bullshit.
Now you care about how the wealthy spend their money? 500 speeches is chump change compared to selling his TV station and apple stock. Al Gore is shitty enough. You don't actually have to lie about his actions.
Now, tell the rest of the story.
Al Gore sold "his" TV network to Al-fucking-Jazeera.
Ponder that, motherfucker. The mouthpiece/propoganda arm of Al Queda and Bin Laden.
But but Trump....Russians.....Kavanaugh.
That is some dirty fucking money. And that goddamned mansion is a carbon footprint nightmare.
AG is worth 300MM. He sold his failing network for (his take) 100MM. At last check Al Jazeera is in a lawsuit with AG over the remaining balance owed of 64MM. That means he made exactly 36MM off of Current TV. Again, a just about bankrupt "network".
Gore was given (how does one of the dumbest occupants ever of the WH get 74MM in free stock handed to him?) free stock and recently sold half of it. That total was 37MM for his shares.
If he is worth 300MM and he received 110MM from the ventures you say is where he made all his money, where do you think the other 190MM came from?
Dance you chicken, dance.
Have you heard of investing and capital gains? Do you think his money just sits in a bank account?
I heard that the rich didn't spend or invest their tax cuts
So were you lying then or are you lying now?
Investing in the stock market is different than a business making an investment leading to employment. You seriously are a dullard. And I chuckle at the others jumping on your fucktarded bandwagon.
Last time I checked, buying stock in a company provides that company capital to make investments leading to employment.
Um buying stock, unless involved in an IPO or pre IPO, gives nothing to a company. That's the dumbest thing I've ever read in here.
So a company isn’t allowed to sell additional shares after an IPO? I’d like to see the law that says that. Please triple down on stupid.
AG is worth 300MM. He sold his failing network for (his take) 100MM. At last check Al Jazeera is in a lawsuit with AG over the remaining balance owed of 64MM. That means he made exactly 36MM off of Current TV. Again, a just about bankrupt "network".
Gore was given (how does one of the dumbest occupants ever of the WH get 74MM in free stock handed to him?) free stock and recently sold half of it. That total was 37MM for his shares.
If he is worth 300MM and he received 110MM from the ventures you say is where he made all his money, where do you think the other 190MM came from?
Dance you chicken, dance.
Have you heard of investing and capital gains? Do you think his money just sits in a bank account?
I heard that the rich didn't spend or invest their tax cuts
So were you lying then or are you lying now?
Investing in the stock market is different than a business making an investment leading to employment. You seriously are a dullard. And I chuckle at the others jumping on your fucktarded bandwagon.
Last time I checked, buying stock in a company provides that company capital to make investments leading to employment.
Um buying stock, unless involved in an IPO or pre IPO, gives nothing to a company. That's the dumbest thing I've ever read in here.
So a company isn’t allowed to sell additional shares after an IPO? I’d like to see the law that says that. Please triple down on stupid.
For sure they can. But Al Gore was given his stock. Then I'm sure he reinvested in mutual funds and shit.
AG is worth 300MM. He sold his failing network for (his take) 100MM. At last check Al Jazeera is in a lawsuit with AG over the remaining balance owed of 64MM. That means he made exactly 36MM off of Current TV. Again, a just about bankrupt "network".
Gore was given (how does one of the dumbest occupants ever of the WH get 74MM in free stock handed to him?) free stock and recently sold half of it. That total was 37MM for his shares.
If he is worth 300MM and he received 110MM from the ventures you say is where he made all his money, where do you think the other 190MM came from?
Dance you chicken, dance.
Have you heard of investing and capital gains? Do you think his money just sits in a bank account?
I heard that the rich didn't spend or invest their tax cuts
So were you lying then or are you lying now?
Investing in the stock market is different than a business making an investment leading to employment. You seriously are a dullard. And I chuckle at the others jumping on your fucktarded bandwagon.
Last time I checked, buying stock in a company provides that company capital to make investments leading to employment.
Um buying stock, unless involved in an IPO or pre IPO, gives nothing to a company. That's the dumbest thing I've ever read in here.
So a company isn’t allowed to sell additional shares after an IPO? I’d like to see the law that says that. Please triple down on stupid.
For sure they can. But Al Gore was given his stock. Then I'm sure he reinvested in mutual funds and shit.
You sure? I think only Al knows for sure. But what difference does it make how he invests? Company stock purchased through a mutual fund still helps the company. Supply and demand
When do 97% of people agree on anything, even ice cream? In scientific circles, consensus is a rare trophy, held to famously exacting standards. When a scientific consensus is finally reached — e.g., the Earth orbits the sun; water freezes at 32°F, 0°C; blood is red — a new fact joins the foundations of human discovery.
Under normal circumstances, a 97% consensus of the world’s leading scientists on anything would establish it as fact and compel action if needed. But our circumstances are not normal. Only 12% of Americans realize that that the scientific consensus on climate change is greater than 90%. Even among people who are Alarmed or Concerned about climate change, the consensus is somewhat unknown. Of the Alarmed, 84% understand the scientific consensus on climate change (16% do not); and 73% of the Concerned (27%).
Is it overstated? Probably, but denying it is absurd, it will certainly create issues for our offspring, but probably not ourselves
I'm willing to bet you don't question sources about the great replacement the same way
Funny how you types like to cherry pick your sources so lackadaisicallly
Sources? I Googled Greenland melting. And would a snapshot of an individual iceberg at 2 different times to make sweeping statements be defined as a "cherry pick" of data?
AG is worth 300MM. He sold his failing network for (his take) 100MM. At last check Al Jazeera is in a lawsuit with AG over the remaining balance owed of 64MM. That means he made exactly 36MM off of Current TV. Again, a just about bankrupt "network".
Gore was given (how does one of the dumbest occupants ever of the WH get 74MM in free stock handed to him?) free stock and recently sold half of it. That total was 37MM for his shares.
If he is worth 300MM and he received 110MM from the ventures you say is where he made all his money, where do you think the other 190MM came from?
Dance you chicken, dance.
Have you heard of investing and capital gains? Do you think his money just sits in a bank account?
I heard that the rich didn't spend or invest their tax cuts
So were you lying then or are you lying now?
Investing in the stock market is different than a business making an investment leading to employment. You seriously are a dullard. And I chuckle at the others jumping on your fucktarded bandwagon.
Last time I checked, buying stock in a company provides that company capital to make investments leading to employment.
Um buying stock, unless involved in an IPO or pre IPO, gives nothing to a company. That's the dumbest thing I've ever read in here.
So a company isn’t allowed to sell additional shares after an IPO? I’d like to see the law that says that. Please triple down on stupid.
Buying a company's stock from the company raises capital. Obviously.
Buying a company's stock on the market from other investors provides demand for the company's stock, helping to support the stock price. This is important for several reasons, not the least of which is that it establishes the stock's value on the market so that when the company needs to raise capital, the public equity markets are an attractive option.
Yes, a company is obviously allowed to issue and sell stock after the IPO. It's called a secondary offering. I've worked on more of those than IPOs.
AG is worth 300MM. He sold his failing network for (his take) 100MM. At last check Al Jazeera is in a lawsuit with AG over the remaining balance owed of 64MM. That means he made exactly 36MM off of Current TV. Again, a just about bankrupt "network".
Gore was given (how does one of the dumbest occupants ever of the WH get 74MM in free stock handed to him?) free stock and recently sold half of it. That total was 37MM for his shares.
If he is worth 300MM and he received 110MM from the ventures you say is where he made all his money, where do you think the other 190MM came from?
Dance you chicken, dance.
Have you heard of investing and capital gains? Do you think his money just sits in a bank account?
I heard that the rich didn't spend or invest their tax cuts
So were you lying then or are you lying now?
Investing in the stock market is different than a business making an investment leading to employment. You seriously are a dullard. And I chuckle at the others jumping on your fucktarded bandwagon.
Last time I checked, buying stock in a company provides that company capital to make investments leading to employment.
Um buying stock, unless involved in an IPO or pre IPO, gives nothing to a company. That's the dumbest thing I've ever read in here.
So a company isn’t allowed to sell additional shares after an IPO? I’d like to see the law that says that. Please triple down on stupid.
Buying a company's stock from the company raises capital. Obviously.
Buying a company's stock on the market from other investors provides demand for the company's stock, helping to support the stock price. This is important for several reasons, not the least of which is that it establishes the stock's value on the market so that when the company needs to raise capital, the public equity markets are an attractive option.
Yes, a company is obviously allowed to issue and sell stock after the IPO. It's called a secondary offering. I've worked on more of those than IPOs.
I knew we were more honeys than just joob brothers.
Reg A me, bitch.
Don’t touch my reverse merger share exchange ratios though.
When do 97% of people agree on anything, even ice cream? In scientific circles, consensus is a rare trophy, held to famously exacting standards. When a scientific consensus is finally reached — e.g., the Earth orbits the sun; water freezes at 32°F, 0°C; blood is red — a new fact joins the foundations of human discovery.
Under normal circumstances, a 97% consensus of the world’s leading scientists on anything would establish it as fact and compel action if needed. But our circumstances are not normal. Only 12% of Americans realize that that the scientific consensus on climate change is greater than 90%. Even among people who are Alarmed or Concerned about climate change, the consensus is somewhat unknown. Of the Alarmed, 84% understand the scientific consensus on climate change (16% do not); and 73% of the Concerned (27%).
So was this a troll job or a trigger job snowflake?
I don’t give a fuck if climate change is real, not real, man caused or not man caused. What I do know is government will only fuck things up more if they are involved. Higher taxes and artificially raising energy costs (which hursts the poor) will save us! Fuck off.
And if you’re a big green new deal person and don’t think nuclear is a major component of getting off carbon, then you need to kill yourself because you’re a hypocrite and not serious about getting off carbon. So double fuck off.
I don’t give a fuck if climate change is real, not real, man caused or not man caused. What I do know is government will only fuck things up more if they are involved. Higher taxes and artificially raising energy costs (which hursts the poor) will save us! Fuck off.
And if you’re a big green new deal person and don’t think nuclear is a major component of getting off carbon, then you need to kill yourself because you’re a hypocrite and not serious about getting off carbon. So double fuck off.
The fact that Bernie didn't include nuclear in his plan is disappointing to say the least
I don’t give a fuck if climate change is real, not real, man caused or not man caused. What I do know is government will only fuck things up more if they are involved. Higher taxes and artificially raising energy costs (which hursts the poor) will save us! Fuck off.
And if you’re a big green new deal person and don’t think nuclear is a major component of getting off carbon, then you need to kill yourself because you’re a hypocrite and not serious about getting off carbon. So double fuck off.
The fact that Bernie didn't include nuclear in his plan is disappointing to say the least
Coming from a staunch supporter
Bernie is a bumbling old commie who thinks China has it right when “helping their poor”.
He’s a clown. It’s not surprising he thinks nuclear isn’t an option. He loses his ability to control people if energy is cheap and abundant
I don’t give a fuck if climate change is real, not real, man caused or not man caused. What I do know is government will only fuck things up more if they are involved. Higher taxes and artificially raising energy costs (which hursts the poor) will save us! Fuck off.
And if you’re a big green new deal person and don’t think nuclear is a major component of getting off carbon, then you need to kill yourself because you’re a hypocrite and not serious about getting off carbon. So double fuck off.
The fact that Bernie didn't include nuclear in his plan is disappointing to say the least
Coming from a staunch supporter
Bernie is a bumbling old commie who thinks China has it right when “helping their poor”.
He’s a clown. It’s not surprising he thinks nuclear isn’t an option. He loses his ability to control people if energy is cheap and abundant
I don’t give a fuck if climate change is real, not real, man caused or not man caused. What I do know is government will only fuck things up more if they are involved. Higher taxes and artificially raising energy costs (which hursts the poor) will save us! Fuck off.
And if you’re a big green new deal person and don’t think nuclear is a major component of getting off carbon, then you need to kill yourself because you’re a hypocrite and not serious about getting off carbon. So double fuck off.
The fact that Bernie didn't include nuclear in his plan is disappointing to say the least
Coming from a staunch supporter
Bernie is a bumbling old commie who thinks China has it right when “helping their poor”.
He’s a clown. It’s not surprising he thinks nuclear isn’t an option. He loses his ability to control people if energy is cheap and abundant
Sanders told Hill.TV’s Krystal Ball, "China is a country that is moving unfortunately in a more authoritarian way in a number of directions. But what we have to say about China in fairness to China and its leadership is if I’m not mistaken they have made more progress in addressing extreme poverty than any country in the history of civilization, so they’ve done a lot of things for their people."
Comments
Very normal stuff, https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2908/landsat-illustrates-five-decades-of-change-to-greenland-glaciers/
Is it overstated? Probably, but denying it is absurd, it will certainly create issues for our offspring, but probably not ourselves
Funny how you types like to cherry pick your sources so lackadaisicallly
Buying a company's stock on the market from other investors provides demand for the company's stock, helping to support the stock price. This is important for several reasons, not the least of which is that it establishes the stock's value on the market so that when the company needs to raise capital, the public equity markets are an attractive option.
Yes, a company is obviously allowed to issue and sell stock after the IPO. It's called a secondary offering. I've worked on more of those than IPOs.
Reg A me, bitch.
Don’t touch my reverse merger share exchange ratios though.
Can you guys make up your fucking minds?
We have science on our side - APAG
Pussy
And if you’re a big green new deal person and don’t think nuclear is a major component of getting off carbon, then you need to kill yourself because you’re a hypocrite and not serious about getting off carbon. So double fuck off.
Coming from a staunch supporter
He’s a clown. It’s not surprising he thinks nuclear isn’t an option. He loses his ability to control people if energy is cheap and abundant
https://www.dailywire.com/news/51135/sanders-praises-communist-china-ted-cruz-crushes-hank-berrien?utm_source=cnemail&utm_medium=email&utm_content=082919-news&utm_campaign=position1