Oh well
Comments
-
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
Lets do the same with voting.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
If only just to end the slaughter of innocents caused by universal suffrage, I guess.Sledog said:
Lets do the same with voting.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
HHusky said:
We really can’t stop aggrieved psychopaths ‘cuz Chicago, obviously!2001400ex said:
No. And that's racist. HTHPitchfork51 said:
Can't expect black people to follow laws, get ID, have jobs, etc.MikeDamone said:
People in Chicago are black so no one cares?2001400ex said:
Do you really not know the difference between Chicago violence and a random person in a Walmart shooting a bunch of random people up.Bendintheriver said:HHusky said:Another mass shooting today. Nothing can possibly be done, of course. ‘Cuz freedom.
There have been 300 killings in Chicago so far this year. Can you send me a link to the thread where you addressed those horrific murders?HHusky said:Another mass shooting today. Nothing can possibly be done, of course. ‘Cuz freedom.
Making political points off of some murdering devil is cheap even for you HH.
Amirite hondo
You two idiots are hypocrites who are blatently taking advantage of these situations for political gain. You really don't care about the victims. An African American kills 8 cops in Dallas, not a peep. Some rando home grown terrorist and his little helper shooting and killing people on the highway in the MW, crickets. 300 deaths so far this year in liberal utopia Chicago, nada from you two idiots.
IT has nothing to do with Chicago and everything to do with your hypocrisy and politics at all cost. The victims are only traction for your politics. -
Well Atl, I remember when you were more troubled by the gun issue. I see you’ve “evolved” to gundamentalism. Is that simply a reaction to who is on the other side or are you now armed?Bendintheriver said:HHusky said:
We really can’t stop aggrieved psychopaths ‘cuz Chicago, obviously!2001400ex said:
No. And that's racist. HTHPitchfork51 said:
Can't expect black people to follow laws, get ID, have jobs, etc.MikeDamone said:
People in Chicago are black so no one cares?2001400ex said:
Do you really not know the difference between Chicago violence and a random person in a Walmart shooting a bunch of random people up.Bendintheriver said:HHusky said:Another mass shooting today. Nothing can possibly be done, of course. ‘Cuz freedom.
There have been 300 killings in Chicago so far this year. Can you send me a link to the thread where you addressed those horrific murders?HHusky said:Another mass shooting today. Nothing can possibly be done, of course. ‘Cuz freedom.
Making political points off of some murdering devil is cheap even for you HH.
Amirite hondo
You two idiots are hypocrites who are blatently taking advantage of these situations for political gain. You really don't care about the victims. An African American kills 8 cops in Dallas, not a peep. Some rando home grown terrorist and his little helper shooting and killing people on the highway in the MW, crickets. 300 deaths so far this year in liberal utopia Chicago, nada from you two idiots.
IT has nothing to do with Chicago and everything to do with your hypocrisy and politics at all cost. The victims are only traction for your politics. -
Are you shaking and about to vomit over your moral outrage? Kinda like when people pick an act of violence by an illegal alien, hang enough paper about it to make Goebbels blush, then pretend to care about the victim and launch into immigration politics, a practice that has helped immigration become the single largest area of focus in American politics? Kinda like that? Kinda like when an illegal alien rapes some white girl and then I don't hear you saying shit about 300 in Chicago? Hey, if the illegal alien weren't here, that rape doesn't happen. Hey, if that kid in the South Side doesn't have that gun, no shooting? Kinda like that level or rhetoric?Bendintheriver said:HHusky said:
We really can’t stop aggrieved psychopaths ‘cuz Chicago, obviously!2001400ex said:
No. And that's racist. HTHPitchfork51 said:
Can't expect black people to follow laws, get ID, have jobs, etc.MikeDamone said:
People in Chicago are black so no one cares?2001400ex said:
Do you really not know the difference between Chicago violence and a random person in a Walmart shooting a bunch of random people up.Bendintheriver said:HHusky said:Another mass shooting today. Nothing can possibly be done, of course. ‘Cuz freedom.
There have been 300 killings in Chicago so far this year. Can you send me a link to the thread where you addressed those horrific murders?HHusky said:Another mass shooting today. Nothing can possibly be done, of course. ‘Cuz freedom.
Making political points off of some murdering devil is cheap even for you HH.
Amirite hondo
You two idiots are hypocrites who are blatently taking advantage of these situations for political gain. You really don't care about the victims. An African American kills 8 cops in Dallas, not a peep. Some rando home grown terrorist and his little helper shooting and killing people on the highway in the MW, crickets. 300 deaths so far this year in liberal utopia Chicago, nada from you two idiots.
IT has nothing to do with Chicago and everything to do with your hypocrisy and politics at all cost. The victims are only traction for your politics.
I profess to have no ready answers for mass shootings and thus refrain from laying blame at anybody's feet. But when you and your goon friends pontificate here on your moral high horse and moan "but politics" it's just too fucking rich for my blood. -
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
Don't be so dramatic. It's unbecoming of a former tuff cop.Sledog said:
Right outlaw white men. All of them. Who's going to do the shooting? You?HardlyClothed said:This white supremacist terrorism is only going to get worse if any Democrat wins in 2020. Spare us the pearl clutching about antifa and their nonexistent body count.
And the socialist genocide seeds are already growing. -
I know it (this line of reasoning) has become cliche now that it is in the hands of the masses, many of which are otherwise stupid, but as the old saying goes, just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean I'm not actually being followed.RaceBannon said:Get rid of it legally and openly then
Lefties tell us that a Trump speech or people shouting send them back is dangerous and could cause violence
But violent imagery and video games don't effect diseased minds.
Doesn't matter we have a First Ammendment.
I support the Bill of Rights
All of it
If you don't like it change it
Picking stupid laws that only law abiding citizens follow isn't going to stop shit
It's just an eternal campaign issue
Simple as it sounds, that is the issue right there. Collecting guns in inpracticable and there will without a doubt be an active and healthy black market for them. You'll only create more crime. It's just like drugs. There is no perceptible difference. -
I’m not setting any unrealistic expectations. I understand many will violate the law if you tighten regulation. But there should be no question that those who do so will be punished if caught. And I’m all for allowing people who pass robust vetting to possess some types of firearms.creepycoug said:
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
It's worked so well for drugs. The left just makes more lenient laws or doesn't enforce them or simply releases all those convicted as in Kalifornia.HHusky said:
I’m not setting any unrealistic expectations. I understand many will violate the law if you tighten regulation. But there should be no question that those who do so will be punished.creepycoug said:
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
Those first ten amendments are granted to us by the government. They are rules the government can not violate.
Considered to be preexisting and inalienable and endowed on us by the creator. -
Madam, you really need to pick a lane. “The left” is more behind the effort I’m proposing than the right is. And fines can also be criminal penalties. Jail time isn’t the only option.Sledog said:
It's worked so well for drugs. The left just makes more lenient laws or doesn't enforce them or simply releases all those convicted as in Kalifornia.HHusky said:
I’m not setting any unrealistic expectations. I understand many will violate the law if you tighten regulation. But there should be no question that those who do so will be punished.creepycoug said:
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
You realize you're starting down a road of arguing against your own argument, right?Sledog said:
It's worked so well for drugs. The left just makes more lenient laws or doesn't enforce them or simply releases all those convicted as in Kalifornia.HHusky said:
I’m not setting any unrealistic expectations. I understand many will violate the law if you tighten regulation. But there should be no question that those who do so will be punished.creepycoug said:
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
If they are granted by the government how can they be pre-existing and endowed on us by the creator?Sledog said:Those first ten amendments are granted to us by the government. They are rules the government can not violate.
Considered to be preexisting and inalienable and endowed on us by the creator. -
New Zealand just did it in 28 days. But hey...it’s unrealistic...creepycoug said:
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
Are you sure they collectedZ them all? Let's wait until there are no mass shootings in NZ before popping off.
Also, aren't there only like 18 people in NZ? I think the US is a much bigger can of worms.
Other than that, I like your spunk. -
Phone slip. somehow "not" didn't make the post. But you knew that.creepycoug said:
If they are granted by the government how can they be pre-existing and endowed on us by the creator?Sledog said:Those first ten amendments are granted to us by the government. They are rules the government can not violate.
Considered to be preexisting and inalienable and endowed on us by the creator. -
The left doesn't enforce shit if they think they can get a vote out of it. Felon voting. Let's see who's in favor of that? Illegals voting? States now register them. Who'd do such a thing? Let 60K felons out of prison? Why must be those conservatives.......HHusky said:
Madam, you really need to pick a lane. “The left” is more behind the effort I’m proposing than the right is. And fines can also be criminal penalties. Jail time isn’t the only option.Sledog said:
It's worked so well for drugs. The left just makes more lenient laws or doesn't enforce them or simply releases all those convicted as in Kalifornia.HHusky said:
I’m not setting any unrealistic expectations. I understand many will violate the law if you tighten regulation. But there should be no question that those who do so will be punished.creepycoug said:
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
No ones turning in shit in New Zealand and they don't know who has them to go out collecting. How's those bans back east going? No ones turned in shit there either.GDS said:
New Zealand just did it in 28 days. But hey...it’s unrealistic...creepycoug said:
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction. -
MallCop is now worried gun control wouldn't be enforced by "the Left".Sledog said:
The left doesn't enforce shit if they think they can get a vote out of it. Felon voting. Let's see who's in favor of that? Illegals voting? States now register them. Who'd do such a thing? Let 60K felons out of prison? Why must be those conservatives.......HHusky said:
Madam, you really need to pick a lane. “The left” is more behind the effort I’m proposing than the right is. And fines can also be criminal penalties. Jail time isn’t the only option.Sledog said:
It's worked so well for drugs. The left just makes more lenient laws or doesn't enforce them or simply releases all those convicted as in Kalifornia.HHusky said:
I’m not setting any unrealistic expectations. I understand many will violate the law if you tighten regulation. But there should be no question that those who do so will be punished.creepycoug said:
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction.
Seriously, when was your last physical? -
It's be the only thing they would want to enforce. Can't get to communism with an armed populace. They have a poor track record on everything else.HHusky said:
MallCop is now worried gun control wouldn't be enforced by "the Left".Sledog said:
The left doesn't enforce shit if they think they can get a vote out of it. Felon voting. Let's see who's in favor of that? Illegals voting? States now register them. Who'd do such a thing? Let 60K felons out of prison? Why must be those conservatives.......HHusky said:
Madam, you really need to pick a lane. “The left” is more behind the effort I’m proposing than the right is. And fines can also be criminal penalties. Jail time isn’t the only option.Sledog said:
It's worked so well for drugs. The left just makes more lenient laws or doesn't enforce them or simply releases all those convicted as in Kalifornia.HHusky said:
I’m not setting any unrealistic expectations. I understand many will violate the law if you tighten regulation. But there should be no question that those who do so will be punished.creepycoug said:
It is not practicably feasible to collect the guns. Sure, I'll take tighter regulation. Most reasonable people would. But guns are here to stay. Have to make peace with it and find a work around to the problem, if there be one to find.HHusky said:
Time to “infringe” on this privilege, not right. Let’s know who has guns and make them qualify and requalify to possess them. Hard time for unlawful possession. And some weapons should simply be unlawful per se.creepycoug said:I have nothing to add here. We've always had guns and we've always had mental illness. Don't know what's changed other than the first guy who let the genie out of the bottle and then established the blue print for the bananas that followed.
Sure I think it would be marginally helpful for everyone to tone down the political rhetoric, but it's not going to stop it entirely. Fanning the flames of one nut's issue dejour doesn't help of course but it isn't the root cause of the whole thing IMHO. The guy who killed 21 in San Diego bought a boom box with him and played that dreadful The Warrior song. I remember people arguing "it was that song!" Lolz.
More guns so everyone can shoot back? Sounds like more mess to me, even though it's a sledog wet dream. But, Never going to collect them all. Nutties will always find them. Too late for that.
I got nothing here. Except maybe just stay home.
And no, any step toward improvement won’t be simple or perfect. But not one of these gun fetshists talking about mental illness really want to do anything about that either. It’s just a distraction.
Seriously, when was your last physical? -
I think we can all agree HHusky is the most likely next shooter
-
Wouldn't I need a gun?Pitchfork51 said:I think we can all agree HHusky is the most likely next shooter
-
They are evidently available via the internet with no background checks. Order one up.HHusky said:
Wouldn't I need a gun?Pitchfork51 said:I think we can all agree HHusky is the most likely next shooter
-
I thought we'd established that I was a pansy assed faggot because I don't want to own a gun.Sledog said:
They are evidently available via the internet with no background checks. Order one up.HHusky said:
Wouldn't I need a gun?Pitchfork51 said:I think we can all agree HHusky is the most likely next shooter
You'll have to do the shooting for both of us, Captain America. -
We'll be on opposite sides. HTHHHusky said:
I thought we'd established that I was a pansy assed faggot because I don't want to own a gun.Sledog said:
They are evidently available via the internet with no background checks. Order one up.HHusky said:
Wouldn't I need a gun?Pitchfork51 said:I think we can all agree HHusky is the most likely next shooter
You'll have to do the shooting for both of us, Captain America.
Was it a good meeting?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-socialists-convention-erupts-due-to-sensory-overload-gendered-pronoun-usage -
Brave of you to side with the psychopaths.Sledog said:
We'll be on opposite sides. HTHHHusky said:
I thought we'd established that I was a pansy assed faggot because I don't want to own a gun.Sledog said:
They are evidently available via the internet with no background checks. Order one up.HHusky said:
Wouldn't I need a gun?Pitchfork51 said:I think we can all agree HHusky is the most likely next shooter
You'll have to do the shooting for both of us, Captain America.
-
I was going to say the same of you! You don't want them incarcerated now you're going to advocate we shoot them?HHusky said:
Brave of you to side with the psychopaths.Sledog said:
We'll be on opposite sides. HTHHHusky said:
I thought we'd established that I was a pansy assed faggot because I don't want to own a gun.Sledog said:
They are evidently available via the internet with no background checks. Order one up.HHusky said:
Wouldn't I need a gun?Pitchfork51 said:I think we can all agree HHusky is the most likely next shooter
You'll have to do the shooting for both of us, Captain America. -
I was going to propose you shoot them. WE can’t shoot anyone because I don’t have a gun. Remember?Sledog said:
I was going to say the same of you! You don't want them incarcerated now you're going to advocate we shoot them?HHusky said:
Brave of you to side with the psychopaths.Sledog said:
We'll be on opposite sides. HTHHHusky said:
I thought we'd established that I was a pansy assed faggot because I don't want to own a gun.Sledog said:
They are evidently available via the internet with no background checks. Order one up.HHusky said:
Wouldn't I need a gun?Pitchfork51 said:I think we can all agree HHusky is the most likely next shooter
You'll have to do the shooting for both of us, Captain America.
