Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Time to Embarrass Yourself Again!!! Predict UW's 2019 team record!!!

1457910

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    13-1, 12-2 (Playoff Loss)
    There's a really good chance that the P12 is the number 2 conference this year ...

    The ACC is total dreck outside of Clemson.

    The Big 10 will likely be up and down as Pedo is supposedly rebuilding, Ohio lost a ton, and pretty sure that Harbaugh will find a way to fuck things up.

    The Big 12 I have a feeling is going to be a mess this year. Oklahoma should supposedly be good but they can't play D and I'm still not convinced Hurts is an elite QB anywhere close to Baker or Kyler. And Texas just feels way overrated to me. There's a lot of 7-9 win teams in that conference.

    The PAC 12 has 9 returning starting QBs this year (Colorado, Utah, Arizona, USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, and Oregon St). On top of that, you have QBs at Washington and Wazzu with starting experience at different schools. The quality of offense in the conference should be really good. The big question will be how they perform out of conference. A strong performance and you may get to a point where an 11-2 conference champion actually looks pretty favorable ... at least compared to anybody else with 2 losses.
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    11-3, 10-3 (NY6)
    Tequilla said:

    There's a really good chance that the P12 is the number 2 conference this year ...

    The ACC is total dreck outside of Clemson.

    The Big 10 will likely be up and down as Pedo is supposedly rebuilding, Ohio lost a ton, and pretty sure that Harbaugh will find a way to fuck things up.

    The Big 12 I have a feeling is going to be a mess this year. Oklahoma should supposedly be good but they can't play D and I'm still not convinced Hurts is an elite QB anywhere close to Baker or Kyler. And Texas just feels way overrated to me. There's a lot of 7-9 win teams in that conference.

    The PAC 12 has 9 returning starting QBs this year (Colorado, Utah, Arizona, USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, and Oregon St). On top of that, you have QBs at Washington and Wazzu with starting experience at different schools. The quality of offense in the conference should be really good. The big question will be how they perform out of conference. A strong performance and you may get to a point where an 11-2 conference champion actually looks pretty favorable ... at least compared to anybody else with 2 losses.

    I agree that the ceiling for the conference is 2, and that the ACC sans Clemson is absolute trash and worthy of last place among the P5. Ohio State didn't just lose a ton of players, they lost one of the greatest coaches of all time. There might be a few years of Meyer momentum that obfuscates their decline because of W-L #s, but it will happen. Statistically the coaches who follow elite coaches almost always fail. And the CFB coaching graveyards are littered with solid DCs who got promoted to HC.

    Agreed on Oklahoma. Texas is getting a lot of hype because they beat a completely disinterested UGA team.

    The P12 really needs another very good/hypothetically-could-flirt-with-being-elite team. Maybe USC because of the brand. Or Oregon because they're the only school with tons of real, passionate fans. Both have proven shitty coaches though. Utah is established and will probably win the south (and maybe the conference) but don't think they have the massive ceiling.
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,589 Standard Supporter
    11-3, 10-3, 10-4, 9-4 (Alamo or lower)
    Gladstone said:

    Browning - 11k twitter followers
    Eason - 123k twitter followers

    QB level up confirmed gfg dd no re

    huh?


  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,676
    Owen (or any other option not present)
    Tequilla said:

    There's a really good chance that the P12 is the number 2 conference this year ...

    The ACC is total dreck outside of Clemson.

    The Big 10 will likely be up and down as Pedo is supposedly rebuilding, Ohio lost a ton, and pretty sure that Harbaugh will find a way to fuck things up.

    The Big 12 I have a feeling is going to be a mess this year. Oklahoma should supposedly be good but they can't play D and I'm still not convinced Hurts is an elite QB anywhere close to Baker or Kyler. And Texas just feels way overrated to me. There's a lot of 7-9 win teams in that conference.

    The PAC 12 has 9 returning starting QBs this year (Colorado, Utah, Arizona, USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, and Oregon St). On top of that, you have QBs at Washington and Wazzu with starting experience at different schools. The quality of offense in the conference should be really good. The big question will be how they perform out of conference. A strong performance and you may get to a point where an 11-2 conference champion actually looks pretty favorable ... at least compared to anybody else with 2 losses.

    8

    Tate is going to be benched game 2 or 3 as he's currently losing the qb competition, but since Sumlin is a pussy hell start him game 1 so the fans and ESPN don't get mad at him.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    11-3, 10-3, 10-4, 9-4 (Alamo or lower)
    I picked correctly last year.
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    11-3, 10-3 (NY6)
    dtd said:

    Gladstone said:

    Browning - 11k twitter followers
    Eason - 123k twitter followers

    QB level up confirmed gfg dd no re

    huh?


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyF23s5-ExI
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,538 Founders Club
    13-1, 12-2 (Playoff Loss)
    Gladstone said:

    dtd said:

    Gladstone said:

    Browning - 11k twitter followers
    Eason - 123k twitter followers

    QB level up confirmed gfg dd no re

    huh?


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyF23s5-ExI
    @RoadDawg55?
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014
    13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)

    I picked correctly last year.

    You picked 9-4 last year.

    That is not the correct pick.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    11-3, 10-3, 10-4, 9-4 (Alamo or lower)

    I picked correctly last year.

    You picked 9-4 last year.

    That is not the correct pick.
    Fuck off! I picked exactly the number of losses.