Time to Embarrass Yourself Again!!! Predict UW's 2019 team record!!!

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

13-1, 12-2 (Playoff Loss)

ApostleofGrief said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

ApostleofGrief said:

I picked correctly last year.

You picked 9-4 last year.

That is not the correct pick.

Fuck off! I picked exactly the number of losses.

Didn’t pup say the same thing?

ThoroughDawg

13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)

Loss to at ‘Fraud or Utah finally gets us. Win conference again; make whoever we get in our NY6 game our bitch. Bring on ‘20 and the off-season Natty!

Cougarfs

7-5. Petersen gets hired at USC. Dogs 41-Cougars 10 on the apple cup.

Pitchfork51

Owen (or any other option not present)

Cougarfs said:

7-5. Petersen gets hired at USC. Dogs 41-Cougars 10 on the apple cup.

Cuog

haie

13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)

Cougarfs said:

7-5. Petersen gets hired at USC. Dogs 41-Cougars 10 on the apple cup.

Accepting plungers from Pete for eternity while praying he gets poached is where you belong.

FremontTroll

13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)

Tequilla said:

There's a really good chance that the P12 is the number 2 conference this year ...

The ACC is total dreck outside of Clemson.

The Big 10 will likely be up and down as Pedo is supposedly rebuilding, Ohio lost a ton, and pretty sure that Harbaugh will find a way to fuck things up.

The Big 12 I have a feeling is going to be a mess this year. Oklahoma should supposedly be good but they can't play D and I'm still not convinced Hurts is an elite QB anywhere close to Baker or Kyler. And Texas just feels way overrated to me. There's a lot of 7-9 win teams in that conference.

The PAC 12 has 9 returning starting QBs this year (Colorado, Utah, Arizona, USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, and Oregon St). On top of that, you have QBs at Washington and Wazzu with starting experience at different schools. The quality of offense in the conference should be really good. The big question will be how they perform out of conference. A strong performance and you may get to a point where an 11-2 conference champion actually looks pretty favorable ... at least compared to anybody else with 2 losses.

Solid argument especially with the QBs but perception wise whatever team rises to the top in the Big Ten will have an advantage over us and Clemson is Clemson so it doesn't really matter how strong the ACC is.

Also the non-conference matchups work against us. The best PAC teams either don't have any marquee nonconference matchups or have a bad matchup. The shitty PAC teams have the best nonconference games (combo of name plus winnable.)


P5 matchups:

UW- nothing. @BYU?
Utah- nothing. @BYU?

Oregon- vs Auburn in Texas (3 point underdog)
Stanford- vs Notre Dame (4 point underdog)
USC- @Notre Dame (11 point underdog.) @BYU?

Washington State- nothing. @Houston?

Cal- @Ole Miss. Probable loss.
Colorado- vs. Nebraska. Probable loss.
Arizona- vs. Texas Tech. Coin flip?
UCLA- vs. Oklahoma. LOL.
ASU- @Michigan State. Probable loss.
OSU- vs Okie State. LOL.

I see lots of underdogs. The most even matchups are Zona-Tech, Cal-Miss, and ASU-MSU but 2/3 are on the road and NOC about the third.

Best chances for statement wins are Oregon vs Auburn, Stanford vs Notre Dame, and Colorado vs Nebraska but all are dogs.

Potential for disaster if BYU is good.

BearsWiin

7-6, but a really good 7-6

oregonblitzkrieg

Pitchfork51

Owen (or any other option not present)

At least we know this thread is invisible to pump

Neighbor2972

11-3, 10-3 (NY6)

Neighbor2972 said:

Losses to Cal and Stanford (twice)

lookin good so far