Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Time to Embarrass Yourself Again!!! Predict UW's 2019 team record!!!

13

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    13-1, 12-2 (Playoff Loss)
    There's a really good chance that the P12 is the number 2 conference this year ...

    The ACC is total dreck outside of Clemson.

    The Big 10 will likely be up and down as Pedo is supposedly rebuilding, Ohio lost a ton, and pretty sure that Harbaugh will find a way to fuck things up.

    The Big 12 I have a feeling is going to be a mess this year. Oklahoma should supposedly be good but they can't play D and I'm still not convinced Hurts is an elite QB anywhere close to Baker or Kyler. And Texas just feels way overrated to me. There's a lot of 7-9 win teams in that conference.

    The PAC 12 has 9 returning starting QBs this year (Colorado, Utah, Arizona, USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, and Oregon St). On top of that, you have QBs at Washington and Wazzu with starting experience at different schools. The quality of offense in the conference should be really good. The big question will be how they perform out of conference. A strong performance and you may get to a point where an 11-2 conference champion actually looks pretty favorable ... at least compared to anybody else with 2 losses.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    11-3, 10-3 (NY6)
    Tequilla said:

    There's a really good chance that the P12 is the number 2 conference this year ...

    The ACC is total dreck outside of Clemson.

    The Big 10 will likely be up and down as Pedo is supposedly rebuilding, Ohio lost a ton, and pretty sure that Harbaugh will find a way to fuck things up.

    The Big 12 I have a feeling is going to be a mess this year. Oklahoma should supposedly be good but they can't play D and I'm still not convinced Hurts is an elite QB anywhere close to Baker or Kyler. And Texas just feels way overrated to me. There's a lot of 7-9 win teams in that conference.

    The PAC 12 has 9 returning starting QBs this year (Colorado, Utah, Arizona, USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, and Oregon St). On top of that, you have QBs at Washington and Wazzu with starting experience at different schools. The quality of offense in the conference should be really good. The big question will be how they perform out of conference. A strong performance and you may get to a point where an 11-2 conference champion actually looks pretty favorable ... at least compared to anybody else with 2 losses.

    I agree that the ceiling for the conference is 2, and that the ACC sans Clemson is absolute trash and worthy of last place among the P5. Ohio State didn't just lose a ton of players, they lost one of the greatest coaches of all time. There might be a few years of Meyer momentum that obfuscates their decline because of W-L #s, but it will happen. Statistically the coaches who follow elite coaches almost always fail. And the CFB coaching graveyards are littered with solid DCs who got promoted to HC.

    Agreed on Oklahoma. Texas is getting a lot of hype because they beat a completely disinterested UGA team.

    The P12 really needs another very good/hypothetically-could-flirt-with-being-elite team. Maybe USC because of the brand. Or Oregon because they're the only school with tons of real, passionate fans. Both have proven shitty coaches though. Utah is established and will probably win the south (and maybe the conference) but don't think they have the massive ceiling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,241 Standard Supporter
    11-3, 10-3, 10-4, 9-4 (Alamo or lower)
    Gladstone said:

    Browning - 11k twitter followers
    Eason - 123k twitter followers

    QB level up confirmed gfg dd no re

    huh?


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Owen (or any other option not present)
    Tequilla said:

    There's a really good chance that the P12 is the number 2 conference this year ...

    The ACC is total dreck outside of Clemson.

    The Big 10 will likely be up and down as Pedo is supposedly rebuilding, Ohio lost a ton, and pretty sure that Harbaugh will find a way to fuck things up.

    The Big 12 I have a feeling is going to be a mess this year. Oklahoma should supposedly be good but they can't play D and I'm still not convinced Hurts is an elite QB anywhere close to Baker or Kyler. And Texas just feels way overrated to me. There's a lot of 7-9 win teams in that conference.

    The PAC 12 has 9 returning starting QBs this year (Colorado, Utah, Arizona, USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, and Oregon St). On top of that, you have QBs at Washington and Wazzu with starting experience at different schools. The quality of offense in the conference should be really good. The big question will be how they perform out of conference. A strong performance and you may get to a point where an 11-2 conference champion actually looks pretty favorable ... at least compared to anybody else with 2 losses.

    8

    Tate is going to be benched game 2 or 3 as he's currently losing the qb competition, but since Sumlin is a pussy hell start him game 1 so the fans and ESPN don't get mad at him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    11-3, 10-3, 10-4, 9-4 (Alamo or lower)
    I picked correctly last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    11-3, 10-3 (NY6)
    dtd said:

    Gladstone said:

    Browning - 11k twitter followers
    Eason - 123k twitter followers

    QB level up confirmed gfg dd no re

    huh?


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyF23s5-ExI
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,302 Founders Club
    13-1, 12-2 (Playoff Loss)
    Gladstone said:

    dtd said:

    Gladstone said:

    Browning - 11k twitter followers
    Eason - 123k twitter followers

    QB level up confirmed gfg dd no re

    huh?


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyF23s5-ExI
    @RoadDawg55?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)
    ApostleofGrief said:

    I picked correctly last year.

    You picked 9-4 last year.

    That is not the correct pick.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    11-3, 10-3, 10-4, 9-4 (Alamo or lower)
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    ApostleofGrief said:

    I picked correctly last year.

    You picked 9-4 last year.

    That is not the correct pick.
    Fuck off! I picked exactly the number of losses.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThoroughDawg
    ThoroughDawg Member Posts: 186
    13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)
    Loss to at ‘Fraud or Utah finally gets us. Win conference again; make whoever we get in our NY6 game our bitch. Bring on ‘20 and the off-season Natty!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Cougarfs
    Cougarfs Member Posts: 53
    7-5. Petersen gets hired at USC. Dogs 41-Cougars 10 on the apple cup.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Owen (or any other option not present)
    Cougarfs said:

    7-5. Petersen gets hired at USC. Dogs 41-Cougars 10 on the apple cup.

    Cuog
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)
    Tequilla said:

    There's a really good chance that the P12 is the number 2 conference this year ...

    The ACC is total dreck outside of Clemson.

    The Big 10 will likely be up and down as Pedo is supposedly rebuilding, Ohio lost a ton, and pretty sure that Harbaugh will find a way to fuck things up.

    The Big 12 I have a feeling is going to be a mess this year. Oklahoma should supposedly be good but they can't play D and I'm still not convinced Hurts is an elite QB anywhere close to Baker or Kyler. And Texas just feels way overrated to me. There's a lot of 7-9 win teams in that conference.

    The PAC 12 has 9 returning starting QBs this year (Colorado, Utah, Arizona, USC, UCLA, Stanford, Cal, Oregon, and Oregon St). On top of that, you have QBs at Washington and Wazzu with starting experience at different schools. The quality of offense in the conference should be really good. The big question will be how they perform out of conference. A strong performance and you may get to a point where an 11-2 conference champion actually looks pretty favorable ... at least compared to anybody else with 2 losses.

    Solid argument especially with the QBs but perception wise whatever team rises to the top in the Big Ten will have an advantage over us and Clemson is Clemson so it doesn't really matter how strong the ACC is.

    Also the non-conference matchups work against us. The best PAC teams either don't have any marquee nonconference matchups or have a bad matchup. The shitty PAC teams have the best nonconference games (combo of name plus winnable.)


    P5 matchups:

    UW- nothing. @BYU?
    Utah- nothing. @BYU?

    Oregon- vs Auburn in Texas (3 point underdog)
    Stanford- vs Notre Dame (4 point underdog)
    USC- @Notre Dame (11 point underdog.) @BYU?

    Washington State- nothing. @Houston?

    Cal- @Ole Miss. Probable loss.
    Colorado- vs. Nebraska. Probable loss.
    Arizona- vs. Texas Tech. Coin flip?
    UCLA- vs. Oklahoma. LOL.
    ASU- @Michigan State. Probable loss.
    OSU- vs Okie State. LOL.

    I see lots of underdogs. The most even matchups are Zona-Tech, Cal-Miss, and ASU-MSU but 2/3 are on the road and NOC about the third.

    Best chances for statement wins are Oregon vs Auburn, Stanford vs Notre Dame, and Colorado vs Nebraska but all are dogs.

    Potential for disaster if BYU is good.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,070
    7-6, but a really good 7-6
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Owen (or any other option not present)
    At least we know this thread is invisible to pump
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Neighbor2972
    Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,330
    11-3, 10-3 (NY6)
    Neighbor2972 said:

    Losses to Cal and Stanford (twice)

    lookin good so far
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    13-1, 12-2 (Playoff Loss)
    Neighbor2972 said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    Losses to Cal and Stanford (twice)

    lookin good so far
    I know you're being bombastic but this team taint winning the norf.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    11-3, 10-3 (NY6)
    Neighbor2972 said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    Losses to Cal and Stanford (twice)

    lookin good so far
    This team isn’t going 11-3
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)
    Houhusky said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    Losses to Cal and Stanford (twice)

    lookin good so far
    This team isn’t going 11-3
    We'll be lucky if we're 8-4
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,040 Founders Club
    13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Houhusky said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    Losses to Cal and Stanford (twice)

    lookin good so far
    This team isn’t going 11-3
    We'll be lucky if we're 8-4
    Pup was right.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Puppy's 6-6 prediction is looking a lot better than 99% of us
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)
    Bump

    We were all wrong

    Thanks for playing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    13-1, 12-2 (Playoff Loss)
    BearsWiin said:

    7-6, but a really good 7-6

    This is on the verge of happening.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jhfstyle24
    jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,255
    11-3, 10-3 (NY6)
    backthepack said:

    You are retarded if you think we lose any of the home games this yr.

    Only 2 potential losses are Zona and Furd. BYU is fucking aids but they are dirty as fuck, we’ll boat race them. Hoping for no injuries that could fuck us

    Fuckin nailed it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doog_de_Jour
    Doog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,041 Standard Supporter
    13-1, 12-2, 11-2 (NY6)
    I’m embarrassed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    11-3, 10-3 (NY6)
    jhfstyle24 said:

    backthepack said:

    You are retarded if you think we lose any of the home games this yr.

    Only 2 potential losses are Zona and Furd. BYU is fucking aids but they are dirty as fuck, we’ll boat race them. Hoping for no injuries that could fuck us

    Fuckin nailed it
    ELITE Prediction
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter