Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
No one is taking your guns
Comments
-
It's a huge part of most leftard's goals. Hondo will lie about it because it's what leftards do. They desperately want conservatives unarmed. No AR-15s no 15 magazines for pistols. Amazingly I don't feel the need to lie about anything
-
Obviously the analogy was over the top. But the point remains. There is no larger plot or the "frog in the boiling water" to guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Horrible, just terrible analogy there. Personal failings <> political party platform planks.2001400ex said:
But you are projecting that on the rest of Democrats. That's like someone saying Roy Moore is a pedophile so all Republicans must be.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Smarter than what? An Illinois state senator said in the open that maybe they'd just confiscate AR-15s.2001400ex said:Lot of idiotic projection in this thread. And Grundle you are smarter than that.
I don't think ALL Democrats are in favor gun confiscation. I do think it's part of the ascendant progressive Democrats politicans.
I don't know if you live in Washington. But look at all the fear that happened over the last gun bill a few years ago. They were saying that gun confiscation was next. That people were going to be arrested for leaving guns in their house or having a buddy shoot their gun. None of that shit happened.
I'm not a huge gun nut or Hunter. But the vast majority of my friends are. And the guns I have in my house rarely leave my house. So I truly support the second amendment. And you've been on this search to prove Democrats want to confiscate guns and all you've found is quotes from a couple Democrats over all these years. I could see your point if there was half the Senate Democrats or something. Has any presidential candidate said they were going to confiscate guns?
Before you say "well they want to confiscate guns, they just won't publicly announce it". Think about this, Democrats are on the stupid bus right now. Yet still, Effectively no one has said they are confiscating guns, because they know it's a loser issue. -
Violence in general tends to improve over time naturally. Gun safety technogy improves over time as well. Most problems don't require a government solution.2001400ex said:
Lefties don't want your guns. They want less dead people every year. HTHWestlinnDuck said:Call when you leftards stop wanting my guns. Most guns in Chicago are illegal. Not like making guns illegal isn't on the leftard wish list.
-
I didn't get past the second sentence.2001400ex said:
Obviously the analogy was over the top. But the point remains. There is no larger plot or the "frog in the boiling water" to guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Horrible, just terrible analogy there. Personal failings <> political party platform planks.2001400ex said:
But you are projecting that on the rest of Democrats. That's like someone saying Roy Moore is a pedophile so all Republicans must be.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Smarter than what? An Illinois state senator said in the open that maybe they'd just confiscate AR-15s.2001400ex said:Lot of idiotic projection in this thread. And Grundle you are smarter than that.
I don't think ALL Democrats are in favor gun confiscation. I do think it's part of the ascendant progressive Democrats politicans.
I don't know if you live in Washington. But look at all the fear that happened over the last gun bill a few years ago. They were saying that gun confiscation was next. That people were going to be arrested for leaving guns in their house or having a buddy shoot their gun. None of that shit happened.
I'm not a huge gun nut or Hunter. But the vast majority of my friends are. And the guns I have in my house rarely leave my house. So I truly support the second amendment. And you've been on this search to prove Democrats want to confiscate guns and all you've found is quotes from a couple Democrats over all these years. I could see your point if there was half the Senate Democrats or something. Has any presidential candidate said they were going to confiscate guns?
Before you say "well they want to confiscate guns, they just won't publicly announce it". Think about this, Democrats are on the stupid bus right now. Yet still, Effectively no one has said they are confiscating guns, because they know it's a loser issue.
Liar. -
The only way to stop gun violence is to work on improving inner city ghettoes
Not taking them from rednecks you fucking dipshit hondo.
The left is only against guns because white people own most of them. -
Then do you support measures that provide more accountability to legal gun owners? Measures that would assign liability to owners' whose guns end getting stolen or otherwise "misplaced" only to be used in ghetto violence? Surely that would help stem the endless supply of illegally obtained arms that flow into the ghettos.Pitchfork51 said:The only way to stop gun violence is to work on improving inner city ghettoes
Not taking them from rednecks you fucking dipshit hondo.
The left is only against guns because white people own most of them. -
As soon as we get a written test and valid verified ID to vote and voters pass a written test, pay for registering each and every year, actually go to a polling place present a birth cert, proof of residency, proof of no criminal convictions, undergo a background check and pay a fee. Then you can exercise your right to vote.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Then do you support measures that provide more accountability to legal gun owners? Measures that would assign liability to owners' whose guns end getting stolen or otherwise "misplaced" only to be used in ghetto violence? Surely that would help stem the endless supply of illegally obtained arms that flow into the ghettos.Pitchfork51 said:The only way to stop gun violence is to work on improving inner city ghettoes
Not taking them from rednecks you fucking dipshit hondo.
The left is only against guns because white people own most of them.
You'll be just like a gun buyer. -
Those accountability law proposals sound appealing to some with their sheen of pragmatism. But it’s kinda bizarre how that could play out legally. Here’s a scenario that plays out for me regularly: I have a CCP and often have a pistol with me. I also have school age children and thus on & off school grounds a lot, where carrying a weapon is prohibited. So I leave my gun in the locked car, out of sight. If someone were to break into my car and steal my gun and then do who knows with it, I’m the bad guy now?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Then do you support measures that provide more accountability to legal gun owners? Measures that would assign liability to owners' whose guns end getting stolen or otherwise "misplaced" only to be used in ghetto violence? Surely that would help stem the endless supply of illegally obtained arms that flow into the ghettos.Pitchfork51 said:The only way to stop gun violence is to work on improving inner city ghettoes
Not taking them from rednecks you fucking dipshit hondo.
The left is only against guns because white people own most of them.
-
It's a good point. I think most gun accountability laws require you to have it kept in a safe at home while you're still free to carry it and leave it off your person when it public. If it gets stolen, your duty is to report that theft. Most state proposals I've seen absolve the gun owner of any liability if they promptly report it stolen. If a statute fails to build that in then it's a bad statute.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Those accountability law proposals sound appealing to some with their sheen of pragmatism. But it’s kinda bizarre how that could play out legally. Here’s a scenario that plays out for me regularly: I have a CCP and often have a pistol with me. I also have school age children and thus on & off school grounds a lot, where carrying a weapon is prohibited. So I leave my gun in the locked car, out of sight. If someone were to break into my car and steal my gun and then do who knows with it, I’m the bad guy now?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Then do you support measures that provide more accountability to legal gun owners? Measures that would assign liability to owners' whose guns end getting stolen or otherwise "misplaced" only to be used in ghetto violence? Surely that would help stem the endless supply of illegally obtained arms that flow into the ghettos.Pitchfork51 said:The only way to stop gun violence is to work on improving inner city ghettoes
Not taking them from rednecks you fucking dipshit hondo.
The left is only against guns because white people own most of them. -
To borrow legal language surrounding 1A to 2A, I think a chief intent of many of these laws is to have a chilling effect.GreenRiverGatorz said:
It's a good point. I think most gun accountability laws require you to have it kept in a safe at home while you're still free to carry it and leave it off your person when it public. If it gets stolen, your duty is to report that theft. Most state proposals I've seen absolve the gun owner of any liability if they promptly report it stolen. If a statute fails to build that in then it's a bad statute.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Those accountability law proposals sound appealing to some with their sheen of pragmatism. But it’s kinda bizarre how that could play out legally. Here’s a scenario that plays out for me regularly: I have a CCP and often have a pistol with me. I also have school age children and thus on & off school grounds a lot, where carrying a weapon is prohibited. So I leave my gun in the locked car, out of sight. If someone were to break into my car and steal my gun and then do who knows with it, I’m the bad guy now?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Then do you support measures that provide more accountability to legal gun owners? Measures that would assign liability to owners' whose guns end getting stolen or otherwise "misplaced" only to be used in ghetto violence? Surely that would help stem the endless supply of illegally obtained arms that flow into the ghettos.Pitchfork51 said:The only way to stop gun violence is to work on improving inner city ghettoes
Not taking them from rednecks you fucking dipshit hondo.
The left is only against guns because white people own most of them.
