The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
Yeah no
Tl,dr
No collusion
No obstruction
No nothing
Muellertards
Cmon Race - If you really try harder you can jam your head further up your own ass. Put some effort into it by god!
And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
The majority of all public school teachers are Rat party supporters. You being the pathological liar you are claim otherwise while you also lie about the demographics of teachers being "pretty close" to the general population. Here's the demographic that Hondo the lying dipshit claims is "pretty close" to the general population.
About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.
Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.
This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
Yeah no
Tl,dr
No collusion
No obstruction
No nothing
Muellertards
Cmon Race - If you really try harder you can jam your head further up your own ass. Put some effort into it by god!
And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
The majority of all public school teachers are Rat party supporters. You being the pathological liar you are claim otherwise while you also lie about the demographics of teachers being "pretty close" to the general population. Here's the demographic that Hondo the lying dipshit claims is "pretty close" to the general population.
About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.
Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.
This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.
And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
The majority of all public school teachers are Rat party supporters. You being the pathological liar you are claim otherwise while you also lie about the demographics of teachers being "pretty close" to the general population. Here's the demographic that Hondo the lying dipshit claims is "pretty close" to the general population.
About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.
Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.
This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.
You are fucking stupid. And racist and sexist.
Which is the kind of response you get when a pathological liar can't back up his mouth and can't admit they were wrong. What happen to your claim that you were taken "out of context" Hondo you lying worthless piece of shit?
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
Yeah no
Tl,dr
No collusion
No obstruction
No nothing
Muellertards
Cmon Race - If you really try harder you can jam your head further up your own ass. Put some effort into it by god!
Post jibberish get bitch slapped in return
You got played Muellertard
Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada
Keep trying - I'm sure you can jam that thing further up there.
And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
The majority of all public school teachers are Rat party supporters. You being the pathological liar you are claim otherwise while you also lie about the demographics of teachers being "pretty close" to the general population. Here's the demographic that Hondo the lying dipshit claims is "pretty close" to the general population.
About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.
Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.
This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.
You are fucking stupid. And racist and sexist.
Which is the kind of response you get when a pathological liar can't back up his mouth and can't admit they were wrong. What happen to your claim that you were taken "out of context" Hondo you lying worthless piece of shit?
Do you realize how stupid you even are? By trying to say that since 77% of teachers are white women, of course the vast majority of teacher are liberal. That's the dumbest argument I've ever heard.
You realize the majority of school districts are in conservative areas right? You've seen the red/blue map of the country.... Yes teachers are a little more liberal than the general population. But it's not the vast majority shitdick like you think it is.
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
Yeah no
Tl,dr
No collusion
No obstruction
No nothing
Muellertards
Cmon Race - If you really try harder you can jam your head further up your own ass. Put some effort into it by god!
Post jibberish get bitch slapped in return
You got played Muellertard
Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada
Keep trying - I'm sure you can jam that thing further up there.
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
If I were a shitbird like you. I'd spam the board with this quote every fucking post you have for the next couple years. Lil lyin Bob.
And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
The majority of all public school teachers are Rat party supporters. You being the pathological liar you are claim otherwise while you also lie about the demographics of teachers being "pretty close" to the general population. Here's the demographic that Hondo the lying dipshit claims is "pretty close" to the general population.
About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.
Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.
This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.
You are fucking stupid. And racist and sexist.
Which is the kind of response you get when a pathological liar can't back up his mouth and can't admit they were wrong. What happen to your claim that you were taken "out of context" Hondo you lying worthless piece of shit?
Do you realize how stupid you even are? By trying to say that since 77% of teachers are white women, of course the vast majority of teacher are liberal. That's the dumbest argument I've ever heard.
You realize the majority of school districts are in conservative areas right? You've seen the red/blue map of the country.... Yes teachers are a little more liberal than the general population. But it's not the vast majority shitdick like you think it is.
That's a good Kunt fuck that strawman ass. What's dumb is your inability to argue against anything I've actually said while you continue to fuck strawman ass Hondo.
Your claim that teachers as a demographic are "pretty close" to the general public is a fucking head up the ass lie that you now won't even touch. So you come up with this crap about how I said 77% are white women therefore they are mostly liberal, a claim I've never made.
You fucking cry like a little bitch about how you were "taken out of context" when I quote you word for fucking word. Meanwhile you continue to make up pure bullshit about things I've never said and try and attributing them to me.
Try quoting and reading what I have actually said Hondo, and stop fucking strawman ass and you won't come off as such a lying dipshit.
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
If I were a shitbird like you. I'd spam the board with this quote every fucking post you have for the next couple years. Lil lyin Bob.
But we both know you're nothing more than a lying dipshit and a Kunt and you'll just run and hide like a bitch while tossing spit balls because you're to stupid to even try and refute a word I said.
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
The fact they don't believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Page was involved in a criminal conspiracy doesn't mean the wire tap was inappropriate. Libtard Trey Gowdy who read the FISA warrant noted in his opinion the FBI did exactly what they should have done considering the information they had.
The claim is actually not pulled from my ass but from the report itself. Try reading it instead of relying on your partisan right wing sources to tell you what to think.
Your Russian disinformation bullshit is just that. A fair amount of the raw intel in the Steele dossier which was never used during the campaign (including the Page info noted in the article) has later been corroborated. Again - a lot of that is in the report which you would know if you bothered to read it.
It certainly sounds like Trumptards who were banking on the IG report to validate what they have been told by partisan right wing media sources are going to be very disappointed...
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
The fact they don't believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Page was involved in a criminal conspiracy doesn't mean the wire tap was inappropriate. Libtard Trey Gowdy who read the FISA warrant noted in his opinion the FBI did exactly what they should have done considering the information they had.
The claim is actually not pulled from my ass but from the report itself. Try reading it instead of relying on your partisan right wing sources to tell you what to think.
Your Russian disinformation bullshit is just that. A fair amount of the raw intel in the Steele dossier which was never used during the campaign (including the Page info noted in the article) has later been corroborated. Again - a lot of that is in the report which you would know if you bothered to read it.
It certainly sounds like Trumptards who were banking on the IG report to validate what they have been told by partisan right wing media sources are going to be very disappointed...
The best part is. No matter the result. They will still bring it up as fact like they do uranium one and shit.
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
The fact they don't believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Page was involved in a criminal conspiracy doesn't mean the wire tap was inappropriate. Libtard Trey Gowdy who read the FISA warrant noted in his opinion the FBI did exactly what they should have done considering the information they had.
The claim is actually not pulled from my ass but from the report itself. Try reading it instead of relying on your partisan right wing sources to tell you what to think.
Your Russian disinformation bullshit is just that. A fair amount of the raw intel in the Steele dossier which was never used during the campaign (including the Page info noted in the article) has later been corroborated. Again - a lot of that is in the report which you would know if you bothered to read it.
It certainly sounds like Trumptards who were banking on the IG report to validate what they have been told by partisan right wing media sources are going to be very disappointed...
The best part is. No matter the result. They will still bring it up as fact like they do uranium one and shit.
Do you mean like you still maintain that this lie is the truth?
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
Gowdy also now says that after reading the still classified FBI transcript of the interview they did with Papadopoulos it changed his opinion on Mueller's investigation.
I'm counting on the facts, while leftists like yourself appear to be counting on half-truths and outright bullshit about what Mueller was actually tasked to investigate.
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
The fact they don't believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Page was involved in a criminal conspiracy doesn't mean the wire tap was inappropriate. Libtard Trey Gowdy who read the FISA warrant noted in his opinion the FBI did exactly what they should have done considering the information they had.
The claim is actually not pulled from my ass but from the report itself. Try reading it instead of relying on your partisan right wing sources to tell you what to think.
Your Russian disinformation bullshit is just that. A fair amount of the raw intel in the Steele dossier which was never used during the campaign (including the Page info noted in the article) has later been corroborated. Again - a lot of that is in the report which you would know if you bothered to read it.
It certainly sounds like Trumptards who were banking on the IG report to validate what they have been told by partisan right wing media sources are going to be very disappointed...
So your position is that they nailed Page, and the Trump campaign and even Trump but they can't prove any of it. Got it.
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
The fact they don't believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Page was involved in a criminal conspiracy doesn't mean the wire tap was inappropriate. Libtard Trey Gowdy who read the FISA warrant noted in his opinion the FBI did exactly what they should have done considering the information they had.
The claim is actually not pulled from my ass but from the report itself. Try reading it instead of relying on your partisan right wing sources to tell you what to think.
Your Russian disinformation bullshit is just that. A fair amount of the raw intel in the Steele dossier which was never used during the campaign (including the Page info noted in the article) has later been corroborated. Again - a lot of that is in the report which you would know if you bothered to read it.
It certainly sounds like Trumptards who were banking on the IG report to validate what they have been told by partisan right wing media sources are going to be very disappointed...
So your position is that they nailed Page, and the Trump campaign and even Trump but they can't prove any of it. Got it.
Not even close to my position. Aren’t you the one always harping on people to stick to what you post? JFC
The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.
Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
How did the Muellertards like theirs?
We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.
Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.
But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.
Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
The fact they don't believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Page was involved in a criminal conspiracy doesn't mean the wire tap was inappropriate. Libtard Trey Gowdy who read the FISA warrant noted in his opinion the FBI did exactly what they should have done considering the information they had.
The claim is actually not pulled from my ass but from the report itself. Try reading it instead of relying on your partisan right wing sources to tell you what to think.
Your Russian disinformation bullshit is just that. A fair amount of the raw intel in the Steele dossier which was never used during the campaign (including the Page info noted in the article) has later been corroborated. Again - a lot of that is in the report which you would know if you bothered to read it.
It certainly sounds like Trumptards who were banking on the IG report to validate what they have been told by partisan right wing media sources are going to be very disappointed...
So your position is that they nailed Page, and the Trump campaign and even Trump but they can't prove any of it. Got it.
Not even close to my position. Aren’t you the one always harping on people to stick to what you post? JFC
The fact they don't believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Page was involved in a criminal conspiracy doesn't mean the wire tap was inappropriate. Libtard Trey Gowdy who read the FISA warrant noted in his opinion the FBI did exactly what they should have done considering the information they had.
Sure seems to me that you're saying wire tap was reasonable and that they can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a criminal conspiracy but there was a conspiracy. Btw, Gowdy's opinion on the appropriateness of the FBI's and Mueller's investigation has changed.
Why was no one ever charged with conspiring with the Russians? And I'd love to see that link to where you claim Mueller was hamstrung by only being able to investigate a "pre-agreed conspiracy" between Trump and the Russians. Since you claim to have read that in the report it should be easy for you to find it and quote it here.
Comments
About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.
Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.
This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.
You got played Muellertard
Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada
You realize the majority of school districts are in conservative areas right? You've seen the red/blue map of the country.... Yes teachers are a little more liberal than the general population. But it's not the vast majority shitdick like you think it is.
What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.
We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
Your lack of anything?
Muellertards. Idiots
Your claim that teachers as a demographic are "pretty close" to the general public is a fucking head up the ass lie that you now won't even touch. So you come up with this crap about how I said 77% are white women therefore they are mostly liberal, a claim I've never made.
You fucking cry like a little bitch about how you were "taken out of context" when I quote you word for fucking word. Meanwhile you continue to make up pure bullshit about things I've never said and try and attributing them to me.
Try quoting and reading what I have actually said Hondo, and stop fucking strawman ass and you won't come off as such a lying dipshit.
The claim is actually not pulled from my ass but from the report itself. Try reading it instead of relying on your partisan right wing sources to tell you what to think.
Your Russian disinformation bullshit is just that. A fair amount of the raw intel in the Steele dossier which was never used during the campaign (including the Page info noted in the article) has later been corroborated. Again - a lot of that is in the report which you would know if you bothered to read it.
It certainly sounds like Trumptards who were banking on the IG report to validate what they have been told by partisan right wing media sources are going to be very disappointed...
Muellertards will be disappointed
Again
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
I'm counting on the facts, while leftists like yourself appear to be counting on half-truths and outright bullshit about what Mueller was actually tasked to investigate.
Sure seems to me that you're saying wire tap was reasonable and that they can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a criminal conspiracy but there was a conspiracy. Btw, Gowdy's opinion on the appropriateness of the FBI's and Mueller's investigation has changed.
Why was no one ever charged with conspiring with the Russians? And I'd love to see that link to where you claim Mueller was hamstrung by only being able to investigate a "pre-agreed conspiracy" between Trump and the Russians. Since you claim to have read that in the report it should be easy for you to find it and quote it here.