The left's destruction of history
Comments
-
Given the opportunity back then, you’d have owned slaves, too. Asshole.HardlyClothed said:Yes, transgressions just as relevant to his legacy as owning humans as property while authoring the lines “all men are created equal”. What would we do without our brain trust SFGBob.
-
WOOF!!!
-
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon. -
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot. -
How chinteresting then that moral codes in religion have shifted over time? Proof yet again that it's a man made construct.creepycoug said:
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot. -
The SJWs are simply the other end of the bell curve of the religious nuts.creepycoug said:
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot.
They are exactly the same zealots. -
That's kinda what I was loading up but was waiting for bob to swing by and call me a Kunt.PurpleThrobber said:
The SJWs are simply the other end of the bell curve of the religious nuts.creepycoug said:
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot.
They are exactly the same zealots. -
You are an objective kunt. In today's real world the young earthers have no impact on my life. AOC and the green gaia religionists want to destroy it. You vote for this shit. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
-
Trying to remember the last time a Christian fractured a guy’s skull with a bike lock. Methinks one end of the curve is worse than the other, at present.PurpleThrobber said:
The SJWs are simply the other end of the bell curve of the religious nuts.creepycoug said:
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot.
They are exactly the same zealots.
But it’s only a matter of seconds before somebody brings Eric Rudolph off the bench. -
Are you saying religiously slavery was forbidden?creepycoug said:
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot. -
Bob? That you? You look different.WestlinnDuck said:You are an objective kunt. In today's real world the young earthers have no impact on my life. AOC and the green gaia religionists want to destroy it. You vote for this shit. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
Whomever you may be, I think you fucked up your post ... again.
#typeslower
#proofread -
Careful. You'll hurt yourself.Sledog said:
Are you saying religiously slavery was forbidden?creepycoug said:
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot. -
Well there are a few wing nuts in the pro-life crowd. But it's been a while.TurdBomber said:
Trying to remember the last time a Christian fractured a guy’s skull with a bike lock. Methinks one end of the curve is worse than the other, at present.PurpleThrobber said:
The SJWs are simply the other end of the bell curve of the religious nuts.creepycoug said:
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot.
They are exactly the same zealots.
But it’s only a matter of seconds before somebody brings Eric Rudolph off the bench. -
Simple question and just wanting to know if that's what you meant.Sledog said:
Are you saying religiously slavery was forbidden?creepycoug said:
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot. -
It has been quite awhile, but maybe they're working on a comeback.creepycoug said:
Well there are a few wing nuts in the pro-life crowd. But it's been a while.TurdBomber said:
Trying to remember the last time a Christian fractured a guy’s skull with a bike lock. Methinks one end of the curve is worse than the other, at present.PurpleThrobber said:
The SJWs are simply the other end of the bell curve of the religious nuts.creepycoug said:
Agreed. It's somewhat complicated, though, when you think about it. If you're a religious person, the very basic point of religion is a belief in objectively measurable morality. Matters of right and wrong aren't relative ... to anything. Things are either right or they're wrong, like math. It doesn't change. It's the very point of religion ... to give our existence meaning by establish immutable, objective truth that doesn't change with the tides.TurdBomber said:
Contextual judgments are way beyond the grasp of your average SJW. To them, slavery is still going on, but in lesser forms of oppression.creepycoug said:
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon.
From that perspective, it was wrong then and there's no apologizing for it. Not even with historical context.
Still, IDRGAF about it. I agree - no SJW wants to let anyone off the hook for any reason. But chintrestingly, they ought to share this view in common with the religious right. But, they don't, in part because the religious right is full of shit too.
#creepycougisareligiousbigot.
They are exactly the same zealots.
But it’s only a matter of seconds before somebody brings Eric Rudolph off the bench.
I mean, the Handmaid's Tale was remade, so there must be a few Uber Christian Survivalists left in the Appalachian Woods.
Maybe they don't know the war is over yet? -
Are you asking me whether the tenets of Christianity forbade slavery? As in, whether there is a specific passage in the bible that defines the importation of people from Africa for enslavement as sinful? Is that what you're loading up?
-
Just asking if religion (I didn't specify which one) forbids it. For all I know you worship turnips. I know Christianity did not forbid it.creepycoug said:Are you asking me whether the tenets of Christianity forbade slavery? As in, whether there is a specific passage in the bible that defines the importation of people from Africa for enslavement as sinful? Is that what you're loading up?
-
I think he nailed you and your post. But, but the Christian Right might do something!!!!!creepycoug said:
Bob? That you? You look different.WestlinnDuck said:You are an objective kunt. In today's real world the young earthers have no impact on my life. AOC and the green gaia religionists want to destroy it. You vote for this shit. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
Whomever you may be, I think you fucked up your post ... again.
#typeslower
#proofread -
Coug is your standard leftwing religious bigot who has a wholly irrational fear of the religious right and what he feels they might do to him. When asked to cite some examples he cited his inability to get an abortion in Georgia.
Meanwhile the religious left wants to take over nearly every aspect of our economy, and re-order our society and is busy forcing their values down everyone's throats every fucking day. But the Religious Right might do something thing!!!! -
I'm just glad those founding religious right nuts made a great country to live in! If we can just keep the cloaked commie/socialist agenda away we might get to keep it!SFGbob said:Coug is your standard leftwing religious bigot who has a wholly irrational fear of the religious right and what he feels they might do to him. When asked to cite some examples he cited his inability to get an abortion in Georgia.
Meanwhile the religious left wants to take over nearly every aspect of our economy, and re-order our society and is busy forcing their values down everyone's throats every fucking day. But the Religious Right might do something thing!!!! -
Transgender athletes again?SFGbob said:Coug is your standard leftwing religious bigot who has a wholly irrational fear of the religious right and what he feels they might do to him. When asked to cite some examples he cited his inability to get an abortion in Georgia.
Meanwhile the religious left wants to take over nearly every aspect of our economy, and re-order our society and is busy forcing their values down everyone's throats every fucking day. But the Religious Right might do something thing!!!!
-
You're the expert.Sledog said:
Just asking if religion (I didn't specify which one) forbids it. For all I know you worship turnips. I know Christianity did not forbid it.creepycoug said:Are you asking me whether the tenets of Christianity forbade slavery? As in, whether there is a specific passage in the bible that defines the importation of people from Africa for enslavement as sinful? Is that what you're loading up?
But, wouldn't that put any religion, Christianity included, into a shit pile? What kind of shit religion do you follow that makes it ok to enslave God's children?
Did you think this through? Because you're not exactly the board's Scalia. It takes a little talent to be a strict constructionist. -
Bob ... is this Sledog guy tonguing your ass?Sledog said:
I'm just glad those founding religious right nuts made a great country to live in! If we can just keep the cloaked commie/socialist agenda away we might get to keep it!SFGbob said:Coug is your standard leftwing religious bigot who has a wholly irrational fear of the religious right and what he feels they might do to him. When asked to cite some examples he cited his inability to get an abortion in Georgia.
Meanwhile the religious left wants to take over nearly every aspect of our economy, and re-order our society and is busy forcing their values down everyone's throats every fucking day. But the Religious Right might do something thing!!!! -
Yeah, because that was the only thing I listed you dishonest Kunt.creepycoug said:
Transgender athletes again?SFGbob said:Coug is your standard leftwing religious bigot who has a wholly irrational fear of the religious right and what he feels they might do to him. When asked to cite some examples he cited his inability to get an abortion in Georgia.
Meanwhile the religious left wants to take over nearly every aspect of our economy, and re-order our society and is busy forcing their values down everyone's throats every fucking day. But the Religious Right might do something thing!!!!
But, but, the Christian right might do something!!!!
Hide under your bed Kunt. -
He said the earthers have no impact on his life. Read the post.SFGbob said:
I think he nailed you and your post. But, but the Christian Right might do something!!!!!creepycoug said:
Bob? That you? You look different.WestlinnDuck said:You are an objective kunt. In today's real world the young earthers have no impact on my life. AOC and the green gaia religionists want to destroy it. You vote for this shit. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
Whomever you may be, I think you fucked up your post ... again.
#typeslower
#proofread
and keep tonguing WestLinn's ass Bob. -
Just stating what I believe. Don't you?creepycoug said:
Bob ... is this Sledog guy tonguing your ass?Sledog said:
I'm just glad those founding religious right nuts made a great country to live in! If we can just keep the cloaked commie/socialist agenda away we might get to keep it!SFGbob said:Coug is your standard leftwing religious bigot who has a wholly irrational fear of the religious right and what he feels they might do to him. When asked to cite some examples he cited his inability to get an abortion in Georgia.
Meanwhile the religious left wants to take over nearly every aspect of our economy, and re-order our society and is busy forcing their values down everyone's throats every fucking day. But the Religious Right might do something thing!!!! -
Could you pigs stop the ass-to-mouth stuff? I just ate, Fuckheads.creepycoug said:
Bob ... is this Sledog guy tonguing your ass?Sledog said:
I'm just glad those founding religious right nuts made a great country to live in! If we can just keep the cloaked commie/socialist agenda away we might get to keep it!SFGbob said:Coug is your standard leftwing religious bigot who has a wholly irrational fear of the religious right and what he feels they might do to him. When asked to cite some examples he cited his inability to get an abortion in Georgia.
Meanwhile the religious left wants to take over nearly every aspect of our economy, and re-order our society and is busy forcing their values down everyone's throats every fucking day. But the Religious Right might do something thing!!!! -
Yes, yes Kunt and you said the "young earthers" are keeping you from obtaining an abortion in Georgia.creepycoug said:
He said the earthers have no impact on his life. Read the post.SFGbob said:
I think he nailed you and your post. But, but the Christian Right might do something!!!!!creepycoug said:
Bob? That you? You look different.WestlinnDuck said:You are an objective kunt. In today's real world the young earthers have no impact on my life. AOC and the green gaia religionists want to destroy it. You vote for this shit. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
Whomever you may be, I think you fucked up your post ... again.
#typeslower
#proofread
and keep tonguing WestLinn's ass Bob.
Not only did I read it, unlike you I understood it.
But, but the Christian right might do something!!!!
Because you are nowhere near a bright as you feel you are dumbfuck I'll help you out. "young earthers" = Christian Right. -
Lolz.SFGbob said:
Yeah, because that was the only thing I listed you dishonest Kunt.creepycoug said:
Transgender athletes again?SFGbob said:Coug is your standard leftwing religious bigot who has a wholly irrational fear of the religious right and what he feels they might do to him. When asked to cite some examples he cited his inability to get an abortion in Georgia.
Meanwhile the religious left wants to take over nearly every aspect of our economy, and re-order our society and is busy forcing their values down everyone's throats every fucking day. But the Religious Right might do something thing!!!!
But, but, the Christian right might do something!!!!
Hide under your bed Kunt.
-
Lolz. Ok. Appreciate the translation.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes Kunt and you said the "young earthers" are keeping you from obtaining an abortion in Georgia.creepycoug said:
He said the earthers have no impact on his life. Read the post.SFGbob said:
I think he nailed you and your post. But, but the Christian Right might do something!!!!!creepycoug said:
Bob? That you? You look different.WestlinnDuck said:You are an objective kunt. In today's real world the young earthers have no impact on my life. AOC and the green gaia religionists want to destroy it. You vote for this shit. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
Whomever you may be, I think you fucked up your post ... again.
#typeslower
#proofread
and keep tonguing WestLinn's ass Bob.
Not only did I read it, unlike you I understood it.
But, but the Christian right might do something!!!!
Because you are nowhere near a bright as you feel you are dumbfuck I'll help you out. "young earthers" = Christian Right.
Keep tonguing your own ass WestlinnBob.
