The left's destruction of history

Sledog

The constant rewriting and slander from the left of our history is sheer lunacy. Poor old Yom has been accused on these very boreds.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/03/coulter-was-thomas-jefferson-on-the-duke-lacross-team/

HardlyClothed

“Slander” history by claiming Jefferson probably fathered a child with his slave, who he had a well documented affair with. Wow the damage to the republic is irreparable.

Sledog

HardlyClothed said:

“Slander” history by claiming Jefferson probably fathered a child with his slave, who he had a well documented affair with. Wow the damage to the republic is irreparable.

I see you didn't read it. Evidence is there/ You ignore it. But then your so far left Stalin is conservative.

Please to post DNA evidence saying he dood it.

HardlyClothed

I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.

Sledog

HardlyClothed said:

I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.

It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.

HardlyClothed

Sledog said:

HardlyClothed said:

I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.

It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.

The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.

Sledog

HardlyClothed said:

Sledog said:

HardlyClothed said:

I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.

It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.

The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.

What does that have to do with anything? Applying modern standards to history is total dumbassness. You fucking 'tard liberals seem to forget that it was the democrat party that did it all and tried to prevent freeing them but here you are a proud member. You are even worse than slave owners of the past.

To denigrate one of the authors of the declaration of independence to lessen him in the eyes of our children (obviously you are a child) and taint one of the greatest minds and documents in human history with lies for no other reason than to advance political goals that oppose that document is sheer and utter lunacy in the name of communism. Nothing new but it's new here.

HardlyClothed

Sledog said:

HardlyClothed said:

Sledog said:

HardlyClothed said:

I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.

It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.

The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.

What does that have to do with anything? Applying modern standards to history is total dumbassness. You fucking 'tard liberals seem to forget that it was the democrat party that did it all and tried to prevent freeing them but here you are a proud member. You are even worse than slave owners of the past.

To denigrate one of the authors of the declaration of independence to lessen him in the eyes of our children (obviously you are a child) and taint one of the greatest minds and documents in human history with lies for no other reason than to advance political goals that oppose that document is sheer and utter lunacy in the name of communism. Nothing new but it's new here.

If you want to fuck the declaration of independence so badly you could head to the national archives and just ask.

Just remember when reading this that it’s the left that is “hysterical”. Criticizing the founders for being slaveowners is even worse than being a slaveowner per Sledog. Criticizing Jefferson for owning slaves is denigrating him in the eyes of our poor children and advocating communism.

Gaze inside the distilled essence of the most internet poisoned conservative mind.

SFGbob

HardlyClothed said:

Sledog said:

HardlyClothed said:

I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.

It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.

The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.

Can we start applying these same standards to the way we teach the history of MLK?

HardlyClothed

SFGbob said:

HardlyClothed said:

Sledog said:

HardlyClothed said:

I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.

It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.

The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.

Can we start applying these same standards to the way we teach the history of MLK?

In which the guy who intentionally plays dumb to make stupid, obtuse points like this, comparing the transgressions of MLK with Jefferson, defends the actual dumbest person on this site.

Sure, if you want to include the history of MLK’s socialism and that Reagan and much of the Republican party opposed making MLK day a holiday for racial signaling purposes, then yeah go ahead. It would be more accurate than the distorted history of MLK the right currently presents using exactly one quote of his.

SFGbob

I was thinking more along the lines of him plagiarizing his Doctoral thesis and cheating on his wife. That should be the emphasis of what we teach in our schools correct?

HardlyClothed

Yes, transgressions just as relevant to his legacy as owning humans as property while authoring the lines “all men are created equal”. What would we do without our brain trust SFGBob.

SFGbob

I didn’t say anything about rating transgressions my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend, I just thought you were interested in full transparency in the way we teach our history, appears that’s not the case.

MikeDamone

HardlyClothed said:

Yes, transgressions just as relevant to his legacy as owning humans as property while authoring the lines “all men are created equal”. What would we do without our brain trust SFGBob.

Teaching that is all the rage these days...

creepycoug

Sledog said:

HardlyClothed said:

“Slander” history by claiming Jefferson probably fathered a child with his slave, who he had a well documented affair with. Wow the damage to the republic is irreparable.

I see you didn't read it. Evidence is there/ You ignore it. But then your so far left Stalin is conservative.

Please to post DNA evidence saying he dood it.

*you're

Flyspeck my spelling cuog!

creepycoug

SFGbob said:

I was thinking more along the lines of him plagiarizing his Doctoral thesis and cheating on his wife. That should be the emphasis of what we teach in our schools correct?

Sure. Why not?

I'd certainly prefer that take to sledog's panicking over anyone thinking less of a guy who's been dead for a very long time.

Why hide it? Let people know it and they can evaluate what matters on their own.

PurpleThrobber

The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.

If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.

What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.

Sledog

HardlyClothed said:

SFGbob said:

HardlyClothed said:

Sledog said:

HardlyClothed said:

I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.

It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.

The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.

Can we start applying these same standards to the way we teach the history of MLK?

In which the guy who intentionally plays dumb to make stupid, obtuse points like this, comparing the transgressions of MLK with Jefferson, defends the actual dumbest person on this site.

Sure, if you want to include the history of MLK’s socialism and that Reagan and much of the Republican party opposed making MLK day a holiday for racial signaling purposes, then yeah go ahead. It would be more accurate than the distorted history of MLK the right currently presents using exactly one quote of his.

They probably didn't like his promiscuity. Those were current moral standards.

Supporting fake accusations against some of the greatest Americans is morally correct in the moronic left's eyes. Hiding similar behavior by the left's hero's is everyday practice and is beyond moral standards.

Sledog

PurpleThrobber said:

The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.

If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.

What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.

Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.

That's where the left is going with this.

dflea

Sledog sounds like a sniveling little bitch in this thread.

Sledog

dflea said:

Sledog sounds like a sniveling little bitch in this thread.

Not a snively as you. That would be impossible.