Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Quuuaaaccckkk

1…1011131516…21

Comments

  • Ballz
    Ballz Member Posts: 4,735
    lawsandl said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    backthepack said:

    Win the fucking north and pop off.

    All you have to cling to is one shitty little upset. Big fucking deal Sark beat Pete Carroll once too. Oregon sold out to win the game on a bye week.

    The Oregon team is demonstrably stronger and deeper than last year. Oregon will be a tough out.

    Not for UW.
    What’s your point spread, SAC?
    24
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lawsandl
    lawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    backthepack said:

    UW is like 50x more talented this year lol

    Right...lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    lawsandl said:

    backthepack said:

    UW is like 50x more talented this year lol

    Right...lol
    Lol okay. See ya in Seattle.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Nurple
    Nurple Member Posts: 686
    I don't get the rankings jism. If the kid is a baller on film does it really matter? If your sweatpants don't give you a indication then you'll know.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Nurple
    Nurple Member Posts: 686
    Look at 2014 shit really doesn't matter. If your coaches can evaluate then your in a good spot. 38th ranked class that year by the way multiple NFL draft picks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Nurple
    Nurple Member Posts: 686
    DON'T GET CAUGHT UP IN THE OFF SEASON NATTY. JFC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    Are y
    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    Someone got pancakes block too. Must mean they’re weak.

    That was a walk-on and it wasn't a pancake. It was a hold as he was reaching to make the tackle and then a block in the back to the ground and wasn't called. We all know Oregon got lucky. Do I need to post pictures of UW's championship trophy?


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ballz
    Ballz Member Posts: 4,735
    DJDuck said:

    Are y

    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    Someone got pancakes block too. Must mean they’re weak.

    That was a walk-on and it wasn't a pancake. It was a hold as he was reaching to make the tackle and then a block in the back to the ground and wasn't called. We all know Oregon got lucky. Do I need to post pictures of UW's championship trophy?


    And UW gets results. Conference Champs. NFL draft.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    StrongArmCobra said:

    DJDuck said:

    Are y

    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    Someone got pancakes block too. Must mean they’re weak.

    That was a walk-on and it wasn't a pancake. It was a hold as he was reaching to make the tackle and then a block in the back to the ground and wasn't called. We all know Oregon got lucky. Do I need to post pictures of UW's championship trophy?


    And UW gets results. Conference Champs. NFL draft.
    No Einstein you were the little girl making excuses about last year. Now you are so disingenuous about your juvenile whining you want to obfuscate and bring up this. You are the only one whining like a little bitch and making excuses Einstein.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,621 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    dtd said:

    dnc said:

    DJDuck said:

    As of now these are the class rankings of schools we are talking about:

    #11 Oregon

    #54 Washington

    #60 USC

    Facts about 3 star recruits in this years class

    Clemson has FIVE 3 star commits

    Alabama has THREE 3 star commits

    LSU has FIVE 3 star commits

    Raw numbers are meaningless at this point, the only thing that matters (for a school that has any decent ability to recruit anyway) are percentages.

    Clemson: 4 3 stars out of 18 commits = 87.8% blue chips, overall average score of 94.56 (1st)
    Bama: 3 3 stars out of 15 commits = 80% blue chips, overall average score of 93.35 (4th)
    LSU: 5 3 stars out of 20 commits = 75% blue chips, overall average score of 92.47 (5th)
    Oregon: 7 3 stars out of 13 commits = 46.15% blue chips, overall average score of 89.58 (19th)
    Washington: 3 3 stars out of 6 commits = 50% blue chips, overall average score of 89.06 (21st)

    Washington and Oregon's classes are roughly equal right now. You can argue Oregon's is better because fuller is better than emptier, but OTOH Oregon's top commit in these calculations isn't really committed to them and Washington's class is definitely trending better of late.

    I'm honestly kind of surprised by how much Oregon's recruiting momentum has slowed down, I didn't expect that. Ever since the shit they pulled with Smalls it's like they can only take 3 stars. It's almost like karma's a bitch...
    This is fair, but come on, it's a lot easier to shoot 50% from 3 on 2 attempts per game.
    True, but when you're talking about a program which took 15 four stars and 8 3 stars last year, but is at 50-50 right now, I'd rather have more spots open than more spots filled in that scenario.
    I mean, yeah, UW is recruiting very very well, but dudes are committing earlier and earlier and the number of blue chip prospects later in the recruiting cycle is lower and lower. You'd rather have 3/6 than 6/13 because one time ever y'all got more than 50% 4 stars? And yes, it's awfully fucking hot for February. Also, the whole stars thing is bullshit. The rating makes a helluva lot more sense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter