Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comey is confused

12467

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,368
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.

    You're discussing this with the voices in your head

    I read the letter and shit

    Very happy, vindicated, and exonerated
    Oh, clearly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.

    You're discussing this with the voices in your head

    I read the letter and shit

    Very happy, vindicated, and exonerated
    *Nothing in the letter exonerates.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.

    I'll bite, what's wrong about Barr's legal opinion? The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges. I get that you don't like that decision. What about it is simply wrong?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,368
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    HHusky said:

    That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.

    I'll bite, what's wrong about Barr's legal opinion? The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges. I get that you don't like that decision. What about it is simply wrong?
    It is wrong to say that you cannot obstruct justice simply because there proves to be no underlying crime. That justification is contrary to law and precedent. I have already said that the decision itself may have been a good one, despite any error in the justification. We can't gauge the quality of the decision, of course.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,647 Founders Club
    The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges.

    Exonerated

    Vindicated

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges.

    Exonerated

    Vindicated

    I wish I had more time to scour the board for your comments when they came out and said Hillary did not commit prosecutable crimes. Hypocrite.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,684
    creepycoug said:

    HHusky said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    HHusky said:

    That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.

    I'll bite, what's wrong about Barr's legal opinion? The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges. I get that you don't like that decision. What about it is simply wrong?
    It is wrong to say that you cannot obstruct justice simply because there proves to be no underlying crime. That justification is contrary to law and precedent. I have already said that the decision itself may have been a good one, despite any error in the justification. We can't gauge the quality of the decision, of course.
    I'm not a criminal lawyer, but you don't need an underlying crime for obstruction to stick. The idea of obstruction is interfering the process ... judicial proceeding, agency investigation, etc.

    So, if you have someone who's being looked at for suspicion of doing something, you're not allowed to get in the way of that effort by, say, destroying evidence. Even if the guy gets off, you won't.

    That idea has been bouncing around here the last couple of days; I haven't chimed in because it doesn't really matter and because I don't care.
    All I hear is obstruction from you
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,647 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges.

    Exonerated

    Vindicated

    I wish I had more time to scour the board for your comments when they came out and said Hillary did not commit prosecutable crimes. Hypocrite.
    But but but

    Still butthurt over Hillary. SAD

    You have all the tim you need liar.

    Comey said she did but she didn't mean to. I pay attention
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.

    After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.

    All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
    Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
    I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.

    Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
    If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russian-officers-indicted-for-allegedly-hacking-clinton-campaign-dnc-emails
    Were they "hacked" or were the released by someone on the inside? We still don't know the answer to that question.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter