Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comey is confused

13567

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    but but but still - hondo

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.

    After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.

    All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
    Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
    I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.

    Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
    If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russian-officers-indicted-for-allegedly-hacking-clinton-campaign-dnc-emails
    Is being charged the same as being guilty? Podesta was phished and gave out his password. That's how they got out

    And what they showed was the DNC fixing the race for Hillary, I'm glad they got caught for it. Anyone should be

    Blaming Russia is what Hillary shills do to cover up for her same as when she lost the election. El Oh EL!!!!!!
    The comment was "if DNC was hacked". Bob lied and you are running cover for a liar.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,641 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    but but but still - hondo

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.

    After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.

    All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
    Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
    I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.

    Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
    If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russian-officers-indicted-for-allegedly-hacking-clinton-campaign-dnc-emails
    Is being charged the same as being guilty? Podesta was phished and gave out his password. That's how they got out

    And what they showed was the DNC fixing the race for Hillary, I'm glad they got caught for it. Anyone should be

    Blaming Russia is what Hillary shills do to cover up for her same as when she lost the election. El Oh EL!!!!!!
    The comment was "if DNC was hacked". Bob lied and you are running cover for a liar.
    Oh

    Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by

    Can we answer that?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    but but but still - hondo

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.

    After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.

    All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
    Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
    I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.

    Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
    If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russian-officers-indicted-for-allegedly-hacking-clinton-campaign-dnc-emails
    Is being charged the same as being guilty? Podesta was phished and gave out his password. That's how they got out

    And what they showed was the DNC fixing the race for Hillary, I'm glad they got caught for it. Anyone should be

    Blaming Russia is what Hillary shills do to cover up for her same as when she lost the election. El Oh EL!!!!!!
    The comment was "if DNC was hacked". Bob lied and you are running cover for a liar.
    Oh

    Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by

    Can we answer that?
    If you can read Fox news. Then yes.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,638 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.

    After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/barr-is-wrong-obstruction-of-justice-doesnt-require-another-underlying-crime/ar-BBVfmVf
    And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.

    You still need a crime to investigate. HTH
    The smarter readers understand that challenging spurious reasoning is exactly that. Your legal understanding and Barr's are both incorrect. Thus Comey's confusion.
    So what crime was being investigated? We can just start investigations without reason? The agencies involved KNEW the dossier was fake. There was NOTHING to start an investigation. Top LE officials lied to obtain FISA warrants. Yet you are still after Trump? This is about right and wrong and abuse of power in a criminal fashion.

    This was a sitting opposition party president and candidate committing a conspiracy to alter a presidential election and to overthrow the opponent when he won that election. If you can't see that you are indeed nuts.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,641 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    but but but still - hondo

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.

    After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.

    All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
    Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
    I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.

    Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
    If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russian-officers-indicted-for-allegedly-hacking-clinton-campaign-dnc-emails
    Is being charged the same as being guilty? Podesta was phished and gave out his password. That's how they got out

    And what they showed was the DNC fixing the race for Hillary, I'm glad they got caught for it. Anyone should be

    Blaming Russia is what Hillary shills do to cover up for her same as when she lost the election. El Oh EL!!!!!!
    The comment was "if DNC was hacked". Bob lied and you are running cover for a liar.
    Oh

    Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by

    Can we answer that?
    If you can read Fox news. Then yes.
    Your links don't back you up as always. Try reading for comprehension
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,368
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.

    After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/barr-is-wrong-obstruction-of-justice-doesnt-require-another-underlying-crime/ar-BBVfmVf
    And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.

    You still need a crime to investigate. HTH
    The smarter readers understand that challenging spurious reasoning is exactly that. Your legal understanding and Barr's are both incorrect. Thus Comey's confusion.
    So what crime was being investigated? We can just start investigations without reason? The agencies involved KNEW the dossier was fake. There was NOTHING to start an investigation. Top LE officials lied to obtain FISA warrants. Yet you are still after Trump? This is about right and wrong and abuse of power in a criminal fashion.

    This was a sitting opposition party president and candidate committing a conspiracy to alter a presidential election and to overthrow the opponent when he won that election. If you can't see that you are indeed nuts.

    Take it easy on the table, Nikita! Getting louder doesn't make your conspiracy theories less InfoWarsish.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,641 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.

    After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/barr-is-wrong-obstruction-of-justice-doesnt-require-another-underlying-crime/ar-BBVfmVf
    And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.

    You still need a crime to investigate. HTH
    The smarter readers understand that challenging spurious reasoning is exactly that. Your legal understanding and Barr's are both incorrect. Thus Comey's confusion.
    So what crime was being investigated? We can just start investigations without reason? The agencies involved KNEW the dossier was fake. There was NOTHING to start an investigation. Top LE officials lied to obtain FISA warrants. Yet you are still after Trump? This is about right and wrong and abuse of power in a criminal fashion.

    This was a sitting opposition party president and candidate committing a conspiracy to alter a presidential election and to overthrow the opponent when he won that election. If you can't see that you are indeed nuts.

    Take it easy on the table, Nikita! Getting louder doesn't make your conspiracy theories less InfoWarsish.
    You mean conspiracy theories like Russian collusion or Bill Barr being in on the scam to not indict?

    Why so angry?
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,684
    This is all working as intended. Now leftists have convinced themselves he's totally lying and it's a coverup.

    Now when it comes out and it's a big fat nothing they are gonna say Mueller is a Russian.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,368
    That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,641 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.

    You're discussing this with the voices in your head

    I read the letter and shit

    Very happy, vindicated, and exonerated