Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.
Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.
Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.
Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.
You still need a crime to investigate. HTH
The smarter readers understand that challenging spurious reasoning is exactly that. Your legal understanding and Barr's are both incorrect. Thus Comey's confusion.
So what crime was being investigated? We can just start investigations without reason? The agencies involved KNEW the dossier was fake. There was NOTHING to start an investigation. Top LE officials lied to obtain FISA warrants. Yet you are still after Trump? This is about right and wrong and abuse of power in a criminal fashion.
This was a sitting opposition party president and candidate committing a conspiracy to alter a presidential election and to overthrow the opponent when he won that election. If you can't see that you are indeed nuts.
Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.
Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.
You still need a crime to investigate. HTH
The smarter readers understand that challenging spurious reasoning is exactly that. Your legal understanding and Barr's are both incorrect. Thus Comey's confusion.
So what crime was being investigated? We can just start investigations without reason? The agencies involved KNEW the dossier was fake. There was NOTHING to start an investigation. Top LE officials lied to obtain FISA warrants. Yet you are still after Trump? This is about right and wrong and abuse of power in a criminal fashion.
This was a sitting opposition party president and candidate committing a conspiracy to alter a presidential election and to overthrow the opponent when he won that election. If you can't see that you are indeed nuts.
Take it easy on the table, Nikita! Getting louder doesn't make your conspiracy theories less InfoWarsish.
Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.
You still need a crime to investigate. HTH
The smarter readers understand that challenging spurious reasoning is exactly that. Your legal understanding and Barr's are both incorrect. Thus Comey's confusion.
So what crime was being investigated? We can just start investigations without reason? The agencies involved KNEW the dossier was fake. There was NOTHING to start an investigation. Top LE officials lied to obtain FISA warrants. Yet you are still after Trump? This is about right and wrong and abuse of power in a criminal fashion.
This was a sitting opposition party president and candidate committing a conspiracy to alter a presidential election and to overthrow the opponent when he won that election. If you can't see that you are indeed nuts.
Take it easy on the table, Nikita! Getting louder doesn't make your conspiracy theories less InfoWarsish.
You mean conspiracy theories like Russian collusion or Bill Barr being in on the scam to not indict?
That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.
That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.
You're discussing this with the voices in your head
That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.
You're discussing this with the voices in your head
That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.
You're discussing this with the voices in your head
That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.
I'll bite, what's wrong about Barr's legal opinion? The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges. I get that you don't like that decision. What about it is simply wrong?
That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.
I'll bite, what's wrong about Barr's legal opinion? The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges. I get that you don't like that decision. What about it is simply wrong?
It is wrong to say that you cannot obstruct justice simply because there proves to be no underlying crime. That justification is contrary to law and precedent. I have already said that the decision itself may have been a good one, despite any error in the justification. We can't gauge the quality of the decision, of course.
That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.
I'll bite, what's wrong about Barr's legal opinion? The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges. I get that you don't like that decision. What about it is simply wrong?
It is wrong to say that you cannot obstruct justice simply because there proves to be no underlying crime. That justification is contrary to law and precedent. I have already said that the decision itself may have been a good one, despite any error in the justification. We can't gauge the quality of the decision, of course.
I'm not a criminal lawyer, but you don't need an underlying crime for obstruction to stick. The idea of obstruction is interfering with the process ... judicial proceeding, agency investigation, etc.
So, if you have someone who's being looked at for suspicion of doing something, you're not allowed to get in the way of that effort by, say, destroying evidence. Even if the guy gets off, you won't.
That idea has been bouncing around here the last couple of days; I haven't chimed in because it doesn't really matter and because I don't care.
That who is totally lying? Bob Barr's legal opinion is simply wrong. We haven't even seen Mueller's report. We're discussing this out in the open. You girls should be happier. Strangely, you're not.
I'll bite, what's wrong about Barr's legal opinion? The two parties with knowledge and legal authority to charge Trump did not make charges. I get that you don't like that decision. What about it is simply wrong?
It is wrong to say that you cannot obstruct justice simply because there proves to be no underlying crime. That justification is contrary to law and precedent. I have already said that the decision itself may have been a good one, despite any error in the justification. We can't gauge the quality of the decision, of course.
I'm not a criminal lawyer, but you don't need an underlying crime for obstruction to stick. The idea of obstruction is interfering the process ... judicial proceeding, agency investigation, etc.
So, if you have someone who's being looked at for suspicion of doing something, you're not allowed to get in the way of that effort by, say, destroying evidence. Even if the guy gets off, you won't.
That idea has been bouncing around here the last couple of days; I haven't chimed in because it doesn't really matter and because I don't care.
Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.
I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.
Comments
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by
Can we answer that?
This was a sitting opposition party president and candidate committing a conspiracy to alter a presidential election and to overthrow the opponent when he won that election. If you can't see that you are indeed nuts.
Why so angry?
Now when it comes out and it's a big fat nothing they are gonna say Mueller is a Russian.
I read the letter and shit
Very happy, vindicated, and exonerated
Exonerated
Vindicated
So, if you have someone who's being looked at for suspicion of doing something, you're not allowed to get in the way of that effort by, say, destroying evidence. Even if the guy gets off, you won't.
That idea has been bouncing around here the last couple of days; I haven't chimed in because it doesn't really matter and because I don't care.
Still butthurt over Hillary. SAD
You have all the tim you need liar.
Comey said she did but she didn't mean to. I pay attention