Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Trump says public can see Mueller report

24

Comments

  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    pawz said:

    420-0 is your answer fuck face.

    Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute?

    Blocked by Lindsey Graham in the Senate. I'm asking this board for their opinion knowing Trump will backpedal and try to block it when Mueller does finish it up.
    If that happens get back to us

    We already were unanimous last week that we want to see it

    Why would Trump not want people to see the fucking farce the democrats pulled?
    No Trump does not want it released. At all.
  • Options
    ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    Trump is just saying that -- he got his boy, that fat motherfucker Barr, to hold the report back!
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    dflea said:

    Sledog said:

    Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?

    They didn't for Trump.

    Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.
    A fake dossier is barely legal

    Easy @PurpleThrobber
    photo 95989554-E696-42C8-B253-1A472A414000_zpsahf8zjya.jpg

    And we both know the dossier is not what stated the investigation. But keep repeating that lie.
    No we don't know that

    It is what started the investigation but keep lying that it didn't
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    420-0 is your answer fuck face.

    Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute?

    Blocked by Lindsey Graham in the Senate. I'm asking this board for their opinion knowing Trump will backpedal and try to block it when Mueller does finish it up.
    If that happens get back to us

    We already were unanimous last week that we want to see it

    Why would Trump not want people to see the fucking farce the democrats pulled?
    No Trump does not want it released. At all.
    Link?

    Why are you so scared of the report? And Trump?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Trump is just saying that -- he got his boy, that fat motherfucker Barr, to hold the report back!

    So you all are just going to double down.

    Tick tick tick
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,755
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    420-0 is your answer fuck face.

    Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute?

    Blocked by Lindsey Graham in the Senate. I'm asking this board for their opinion knowing Trump will backpedal and try to block it when Mueller does finish it up.
    If that happens get back to us

    We already were unanimous last week that we want to see it

    Why would Trump not want people to see the fucking farce the democrats pulled?
    No Trump does not want it released. At all.
    Are you out of your fucking mind?


    Wait. What am I thinking. Of course you are.

    #HondoBros #aclockworkshill #rightontim

  • Options
    ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment

    Trump is just saying that -- he got his boy, that fat motherfucker Barr, to hold the report back!

    So you all are just going to double down.

    Tick tick tick
    Put "double down" in the same overused scrapheap as "leveraged"
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Trump is just saying that -- he got his boy, that fat motherfucker Barr, to hold the report back!

    So you all are just going to double down.

    Tick tick tick
    Put "double down" in the same overused scrapheap as "leveraged"
    Some of you are up to quadruple down

    The North never forgets
  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary

    dflea said:

    Sledog said:

    Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?

    They didn't for Trump.

    Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.
    A fake dossier is barely legal

    Easy @PurpleThrobber
    A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?

    Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    dflea said:

    Sledog said:

    Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?

    They didn't for Trump.

    Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.
    A fake dossier is barely legal

    Easy @PurpleThrobber
    A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?

    Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
    This always scares you

    And gets a Pavlovian response
  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary

    dflea said:

    Sledog said:

    Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?

    They didn't for Trump.

    Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.
    A fake dossier is barely legal

    Easy @PurpleThrobber
    A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?

    Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
    This always scares you

    And gets a Pavlovian response
    Yes, because US district attorney Huber is going to bring the hammer. Any day now? Is gitmo ready?
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    2001400ex said:

    dflea said:

    Sledog said:

    Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?

    They didn't for Trump.

    Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.
    A fake dossier is barely legal

    Easy @PurpleThrobber
    photo 95989554-E696-42C8-B253-1A472A414000_zpsahf8zjya.jpg

    And we both know the dossier is not what stated the investigation. But keep repeating that lie.
    See...we do have common ground....

    brb yo
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,755
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    dflea said:

    Sledog said:

    Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?

    They didn't for Trump.

    Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.
    A fake dossier is barely legal

    Easy @PurpleThrobber
    A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?

    Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
    This always scares you

    And gets a Pavlovian response
    Yes, because US district attorney Huber is going to bring the hammer. Any day now? Is gitmo ready?

    You're really struggling.

  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary
    pawz said:

    dflea said:

    Sledog said:

    Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?

    They didn't for Trump.

    Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.
    A fake dossier is barely legal

    Easy @PurpleThrobber
    A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?

    Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
    This always scares you

    And gets a Pavlovian response
    Yes, because US district attorney Huber is going to bring the hammer. Any day now? Is gitmo ready?

    You're really struggling.

    You sound outraged by the fake dossier. It’s bigger than watergate. I’m hearing Democrats did this. When will the hammer fall?
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    pawz said:

    dflea said:

    Sledog said:

    Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?

    They didn't for Trump.

    Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.
    A fake dossier is barely legal

    Easy @PurpleThrobber
    A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?

    Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
    This always scares you

    And gets a Pavlovian response
    Yes, because US district attorney Huber is going to bring the hammer. Any day now? Is gitmo ready?

    You're really struggling.

    You sound outraged by the fake dossier. It’s bigger than watergate. I’m hearing Democrats did this. When will the hammer fall?
    WOOF
  • Options
    insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    420-0 is your answer fuck face.

    Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute?

    Blocked by Lindsey Graham in the Senate. I'm asking this board for their opinion knowing Trump will backpedal and try to block it when Mueller does finish it up.
    If that happens get back to us

    We already were unanimous last week that we want to see it

    Why would Trump not want people to see the fucking farce the democrats pulled?
    No Trump does not want it released. At all.
    He wants them released as much as he wants his school grades and tax returns to be released.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    420-0 is your answer fuck face.

    Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute?

    Blocked by Lindsey Graham in the Senate. I'm asking this board for their opinion knowing Trump will backpedal and try to block it when Mueller does finish it up.
    If that happens get back to us

    We already were unanimous last week that we want to see it

    Why would Trump not want people to see the fucking farce the democrats pulled?
    No Trump does not want it released. At all.
    He wants them released as much as he wants his school grades and tax returns to be released.
    ROTFLMAO

    Link?
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    @insinceredawg will tell us that he never thought there was collusion anyway and didn't want a SP to waste 2 years on it

    Cook it

    Yeah, it's always been about obstruction of justice and Trump's finances. Collusion was just the vehicle they used to get there. Hell Hondo said essentially that just a few weeks back.
    It's never the action. It's the cover up that gets you in trouble. See Nixon and Clinton if you disagree.
    Trump thought about firing someone

    Obstruction


    Mueller dragged this out two years waiting on obstruction that never came

    Will you lie about that too?
    How long did the Starr investigation last?
    Starr was asked by the AG to expand his investigation into additional areas. It took a long time because of the Clinton Admin stonewalling and because the initial investigation was expanded at the request of the AG.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    @insinceredawg will tell us that he never thought there was collusion anyway and didn't want a SP to waste 2 years on it

    Cook it

    Yeah, it's always been about obstruction of justice and Trump's finances. Collusion was just the vehicle they used to get there. Hell Hondo said essentially that just a few weeks back.
    It's never the action. It's the cover up that gets you in trouble. See Nixon and Clinton if you disagree.
    Trump thought about firing someone

    Obstruction


    Mueller dragged this out two years waiting on obstruction that never came

    Will you lie about that too?
    How long did the Starr investigation last?
    Starr was asked by the AG to expand his investigation into additional areas. It took a long time because of the Clinton Admin stonewalling and because the initial investigation was expanded at the request of the AG.
    Bob. Misses the point. Blames the liberal. As. Always.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    @insinceredawg will tell us that he never thought there was collusion anyway and didn't want a SP to waste 2 years on it

    Cook it

    Yeah, it's always been about obstruction of justice and Trump's finances. Collusion was just the vehicle they used to get there. Hell Hondo said essentially that just a few weeks back.
    It's never the action. It's the cover up that gets you in trouble. See Nixon and Clinton if you disagree.
    Trump thought about firing someone

    Obstruction


    Mueller dragged this out two years waiting on obstruction that never came

    Will you lie about that too?
    How long did the Starr investigation last?
    Starr was asked by the AG to expand his investigation into additional areas. It took a long time because of the Clinton Admin stonewalling and because the initial investigation was expanded at the request of the AG.
    Bob. Misses the point. Blames the liberal. As. Always.
    You asked a question and I gave you an answer. If you don't like my answer and think it's wrong you're free to cite some evidence showing what I got wrong but we both know you're a stupid Kunt who would never be able to do that.
Sign In or Register to comment.