Trump says public can see Mueller report
Comments
-
Yes, because US district attorney Huber is going to bring the hammer. Any day now? Is gitmo ready?RaceBannon said:
This always scares youCirrhosisDawg said:
A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?RaceBannon said:
A fake dossier is barely legaldflea said:
Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.Sledog said:Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?
They didn't for Trump.
Easy @PurpleThrobber
Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
And gets a Pavlovian response -
See...we do have common ground....2001400ex said:RaceBannon said:
A fake dossier is barely legaldflea said:
Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.Sledog said:Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?
They didn't for Trump.
Easy @PurpleThrobber
And we both know the dossier is not what stated the investigation. But keep repeating that lie.
brb yo -
CirrhosisDawg said:
Yes, because US district attorney Huber is going to bring the hammer. Any day now? Is gitmo ready?RaceBannon said:
This always scares youCirrhosisDawg said:
A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?RaceBannon said:
A fake dossier is barely legaldflea said:
Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.Sledog said:Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?
They didn't for Trump.
Easy @PurpleThrobber
Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
And gets a Pavlovian response
You're really struggling.
-
You sound outraged by the fake dossier. It’s bigger than watergate. I’m hearing Democrats did this. When will the hammer fall?pawz said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Yes, because US district attorney Huber is going to bring the hammer. Any day now? Is gitmo ready?RaceBannon said:
This always scares youCirrhosisDawg said:
A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?RaceBannon said:
A fake dossier is barely legaldflea said:
Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.Sledog said:Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?
They didn't for Trump.
Easy @PurpleThrobber
Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
And gets a Pavlovian response
You're really struggling. -
WOOFCirrhosisDawg said:
You sound outraged by the fake dossier. It’s bigger than watergate. I’m hearing Democrats did this. When will the hammer fall?pawz said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Yes, because US district attorney Huber is going to bring the hammer. Any day now? Is gitmo ready?RaceBannon said:
This always scares youCirrhosisDawg said:
A fake dossier?!? Was the fbi involved? DOJ too? Don’t tell me the cia as well?RaceBannon said:
A fake dossier is barely legaldflea said:
Yes they did. Go get the sandwich out of your sock drawer. Have it with a pudding cup.Sledog said:Did they have a legal reason to start the Star investigation?
They didn't for Trump.
Easy @PurpleThrobber
Holy shit, this sounds bigger than watergate. What are you going to do!?1?!
And gets a Pavlovian response
You're really struggling. -
He wants them released as much as he wants his school grades and tax returns to be released.2001400ex said:
No Trump does not want it released. At all.RaceBannon said:
If that happens get back to usinsinceredawg said:
Blocked by Lindsey Graham in the Senate. I'm asking this board for their opinion knowing Trump will backpedal and try to block it when Mueller does finish it up.pawz said:
420-0 is your answer fuck face.insinceredawg said:Do the Trumptards to agree with your Dear Leader on this?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/434938-trump-on-mueller-report-well-see-if-its-legit
Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute?
We already were unanimous last week that we want to see it
Why would Trump not want people to see the fucking farce the democrats pulled? -
ROTFLMAOinsinceredawg said:
He wants them released as much as he wants his school grades and tax returns to be released.2001400ex said:
No Trump does not want it released. At all.RaceBannon said:
If that happens get back to usinsinceredawg said:
Blocked by Lindsey Graham in the Senate. I'm asking this board for their opinion knowing Trump will backpedal and try to block it when Mueller does finish it up.pawz said:
420-0 is your answer fuck face.insinceredawg said:Do the Trumptards to agree with your Dear Leader on this?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/434938-trump-on-mueller-report-well-see-if-its-legit
Do you have anything worthwhile to contribute?
We already were unanimous last week that we want to see it
Why would Trump not want people to see the fucking farce the democrats pulled?
Link? -
Starr was asked by the AG to expand his investigation into additional areas. It took a long time because of the Clinton Admin stonewalling and because the initial investigation was expanded at the request of the AG.2001400ex said:
How long did the Starr investigation last?RaceBannon said:
Trump thought about firing someone2001400ex said:
It's never the action. It's the cover up that gets you in trouble. See Nixon and Clinton if you disagree.SFGbob said:
Yeah, it's always been about obstruction of justice and Trump's finances. Collusion was just the vehicle they used to get there. Hell Hondo said essentially that just a few weeks back.RaceBannon said:@insinceredawg will tell us that he never thought there was collusion anyway and didn't want a SP to waste 2 years on it
Cook it
Obstruction
Mueller dragged this out two years waiting on obstruction that never came
Will you lie about that too? -
Bob. Misses the point. Blames the liberal. As. Always.SFGbob said:
Starr was asked by the AG to expand his investigation into additional areas. It took a long time because of the Clinton Admin stonewalling and because the initial investigation was expanded at the request of the AG.2001400ex said:
How long did the Starr investigation last?RaceBannon said:
Trump thought about firing someone2001400ex said:
It's never the action. It's the cover up that gets you in trouble. See Nixon and Clinton if you disagree.SFGbob said:
Yeah, it's always been about obstruction of justice and Trump's finances. Collusion was just the vehicle they used to get there. Hell Hondo said essentially that just a few weeks back.RaceBannon said:@insinceredawg will tell us that he never thought there was collusion anyway and didn't want a SP to waste 2 years on it
Cook it
Obstruction
Mueller dragged this out two years waiting on obstruction that never came
Will you lie about that too? -
You asked a question and I gave you an answer. If you don't like my answer and think it's wrong you're free to cite some evidence showing what I got wrong but we both know you're a stupid Kunt who would never be able to do that.2001400ex said:
Bob. Misses the point. Blames the liberal. As. Always.SFGbob said:
Starr was asked by the AG to expand his investigation into additional areas. It took a long time because of the Clinton Admin stonewalling and because the initial investigation was expanded at the request of the AG.2001400ex said:
How long did the Starr investigation last?RaceBannon said:
Trump thought about firing someone2001400ex said:
It's never the action. It's the cover up that gets you in trouble. See Nixon and Clinton if you disagree.SFGbob said:
Yeah, it's always been about obstruction of justice and Trump's finances. Collusion was just the vehicle they used to get there. Hell Hondo said essentially that just a few weeks back.RaceBannon said:@insinceredawg will tell us that he never thought there was collusion anyway and didn't want a SP to waste 2 years on it
Cook it
Obstruction
Mueller dragged this out two years waiting on obstruction that never came
Will you lie about that too?






