Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Show your support for what this community means to you:


Choose a Donation Amount
Username (required for credit)



Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. If you dare criticize Jimmy Lake, you won't last long.

Surprise surprise!

«1

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Posts: 1,837
    250 Answers 500 Up Votes 1000 Comments 100 Awesomes
    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!
    MikeDamoneSledogRaceBannonpawzDawgtonaSoutherndawgCuntWaffle
  • SledogSledog Posts: 9,272
    5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes 500 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
  • HHuskyHHusky Posts: 1,837
    250 Answers 500 Up Votes 1000 Comments 100 Awesomes
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    RaceBannonMikeDamoneSoutherndawgDuckHHunterisafagCuntWaffleSledog
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 23,839
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    pawzRaceBannonMikeDamoneDawgtonaSoutherndawg
  • SFGbobSFGbob Posts: 6,811
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    Yeah, beat off to Hondo lying his ass off about Banks being held liable for lending money to people who later have an accident.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 23,839
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    Yeah, beat off to Hondo lying his ass off about Banks being held liable for lending money to people who later have an accident.
    Lil lyin Bob
    pawzSoutherndawgDuckHHunterisafagRaceBannonCuntWaffle
  • SFGbobSFGbob Posts: 6,811
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    Yeah, beat off to Hondo lying his ass off about Banks being held liable for lending money to people who later have an accident.
    Lil lyin Bob
    Yeah, and you never said anything about the MAGA hat wearing kids.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Posts: 5,534
    Swaye's Wigwam 5000 Comments Sixth Anniversary 250 Answers
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    Yeah, beat off to Hondo lying his ass off about Banks being held liable for lending money to people who later have an accident.
    Lil lyin Bob
    Projecting. Again.
    MikeDamoneRaceBannon
  • SFGbobSFGbob Posts: 6,811
    Standard Supporter 5000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Awesomes
    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.
    MikeDamoneRaceBannonGrundleStiltzkinpawz
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 23,839
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    RaceBannonpawzSoutherndawg
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 41,922
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    MikeDamone
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 23,839
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.
    MikeDamoneRaceBannonSoutherndawg
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Posts: 14,903
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    edited March 14
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.

    Still waiting for an example.... just one.

    Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.

    Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
    RaceBannon
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Posts: 23,839
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.

    Still waiting for an example.... just one.

    Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.

    Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
    I have stated that I don't agree with AOC on many things. This situation is even hypothetical. And there are circumstances where attorneys will go after deep pockets, if you don't understand that basic rule of America, I can't help you.

    And whether it's happened in the past is irrelevant. Things change all the time. Prior to Arthur Anderson, no huge CPA firm had been taken down for fraud at a couple clients. Prior to the great recession, no large investment brokerage like Lehman brothers had gone down (post great depression). In other words, your defense by saying "it's never happened before" is laughable and ignorant.
    RaceBannonpawzMikeDamoneSFGbobTurdBomberSoutherndawg
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Posts: 41,922
    Swaye's Wigwam 25000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.
    Shut up
    MikeDamoneUSMChawkSoutherndawg
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Posts: 17,719
    Standard Supporter 10000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    Thud
    RaceBannonGrundleStiltzkinSoutherndawg
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Posts: 14,903
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.

    Still waiting for an example.... just one.

    Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.

    Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
    I have stated that I don't agree with AOC on many things. This situation is even hypothetical. And there are circumstances where attorneys will go after deep pockets, if you don't understand that basic rule of America, I can't help you.

    And whether it's happened in the past is irrelevant. Things change all the time. Prior to Arthur Anderson, no huge CPA firm had been taken down for fraud at a couple clients. Prior to the great recession, no large investment brokerage like Lehman brothers had gone down (post great depression). In other words, your defense by saying "it's never happened before" is laughable and ignorant.
    So no examples. Got it.
    RaceBannonSoutherndawg
  • pawzpawz Posts: 6,509
    Swaye's Wigwam 5000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.

    Still waiting for an example.... just one.

    Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.

    Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
    I have stated that I don't agree with AOC on many things. This situation is even hypothetical. And there are circumstances where attorneys will go after deep pockets, if you don't understand that basic rule of America, I can't help you.

    And whether it's happened in the past is irrelevant. Things change all the time. Prior to Arthur Anderson, no huge CPA firm had been taken down for fraud at a couple clients. Prior to the great recession, no large investment brokerage like Lehman brothers had gone down (post great depression). In other words, your defense by saying "it's never happened before" is laughable and ignorant.

    Your establishment shill-masters don't agree with AOC on many things.

    Fuck off.


    MikeDamoneSoutherndawg
Sign In or Register to comment.