Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Surprise surprise!

SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,638
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
in Tug Tavern
Who'd of thought Dems don't want people to know how many illegals are here.......

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/reps-jordan-and-meadows-democrats-dont-care-about-the-integrity-of-the-census
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,107
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,638
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,107
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    Yeah, beat off to Hondo lying his ass off about Banks being held liable for lending money to people who later have an accident.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    Yeah, beat off to Hondo lying his ass off about Banks being held liable for lending money to people who later have an accident.
    Lil lyin Bob
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    Yeah, beat off to Hondo lying his ass off about Banks being held liable for lending money to people who later have an accident.
    Lil lyin Bob
    Yeah, and you never said anything about the MAGA hat wearing kids.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,233
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!

    So you agree with the libs we shouldn't know how many illegals are here?

    What purpose would that serve?
    You're expecting to ask this question and get good information back. That's funny.
    Do you expect an honest discussion with a dude that beats off to a partisan opinion article that says Democrats need illegals to vote to survive as a party and Democrats want the census results to lack integrity?
    Yeah, beat off to Hondo lying his ass off about Banks being held liable for lending money to people who later have an accident.
    Lil lyin Bob
    Projecting. Again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,149
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited March 2019
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.

    Still waiting for an example.... just one.

    Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.

    Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.

    Still waiting for an example.... just one.

    Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.

    Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
    I have stated that I don't agree with AOC on many things. This situation is even hypothetical. And there are circumstances where attorneys will go after deep pockets, if you don't understand that basic rule of America, I can't help you.

    And whether it's happened in the past is irrelevant. Things change all the time. Prior to Arthur Anderson, no huge CPA firm had been taken down for fraud at a couple clients. Prior to the great recession, no large investment brokerage like Lehman brothers had gone down (post great depression). In other words, your defense by saying "it's never happened before" is laughable and ignorant.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,149
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.
    Shut up
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.

    Still waiting for an example.... just one.

    Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.

    Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
    I have stated that I don't agree with AOC on many things. This situation is even hypothetical. And there are circumstances where attorneys will go after deep pockets, if you don't understand that basic rule of America, I can't help you.

    And whether it's happened in the past is irrelevant. Things change all the time. Prior to Arthur Anderson, no huge CPA firm had been taken down for fraud at a couple clients. Prior to the great recession, no large investment brokerage like Lehman brothers had gone down (post great depression). In other words, your defense by saying "it's never happened before" is laughable and ignorant.
    So no examples. Got it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,749
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"

    She is then roundly mocked.

    Hondo then jumps into to defend her:

    Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.

    The only liar here as always Hondo is you.

    Banks can be held liable. Idiot.
    If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that

    So just repeat the lie
    What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.

    But stay Ignorant like Bob.

    Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.

    Still waiting for an example.... just one.

    Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.

    Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
    I have stated that I don't agree with AOC on many things. This situation is even hypothetical. And there are circumstances where attorneys will go after deep pockets, if you don't understand that basic rule of America, I can't help you.

    And whether it's happened in the past is irrelevant. Things change all the time. Prior to Arthur Anderson, no huge CPA firm had been taken down for fraud at a couple clients. Prior to the great recession, no large investment brokerage like Lehman brothers had gone down (post great depression). In other words, your defense by saying "it's never happened before" is laughable and ignorant.

    Your establishment shill-masters don't agree with AOC on many things.

    Fuck off.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.