Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The Daily AOC
Comments
-
George Washington served two terms. That was enough for everyone else up to FDR. But the people kept electing him so he kept running
It was a reaction to that to put into law the GW "rule". Didn't pass the states until 1951. It would have stopped a 6th term so there
People forget that in the 80's the GOP wished that amendment hadn't passed -
Doubling down is BallzFSGrundleStiltzkin said: -
She's an angry and sorta arrogant kid.HillsboroDuck said:
Doubling down is BallzFSGrundleStiltzkin said: -
But she can mix a mean Margarita, I hear.GrundleStiltzkin said:
She's an angry and sorta arrogant kid.HillsboroDuck said:
Doubling down is BallzFSGrundleStiltzkin said: -
Bullshit. She does that no Cointreau and just agave and tequila with not fresh limeTurdBuffer said:
But she can mix a mean Margarita, I hear.GrundleStiltzkin said:
She's an angry and sorta arrogant kid.HillsboroDuck said:
Doubling down is BallzFSGrundleStiltzkin said: -
Is it? She was wrong that it was specifically to prevent another FDR term however I don’t think that makes her point wrong. It was in response to FDR and it was a political power move.HillsboroDuck said:
Doubling down is BallzFSGrundleStiltzkin said:
Think about it like this, what would the rights reaction have been had Obama pushed to end presidential term limits even if it wouldn’t affect him? It would have been psychotic outrage and the people most outraged are the ones attacking AOC for this and you can’t square those things.
The singular point of it preventing another FDR term is wrong, the point she was making stands. -
That’s some serious mental gymnastics to get it that conclusion. However, I’d expect nothing less.allpurpleallgold said:
Is it? She was wrong that it was specifically to prevent another FDR term however I don’t think that makes her point wrong. It was in response to FDR and it was a political power move.HillsboroDuck said:
Doubling down is BallzFSGrundleStiltzkin said:
Think about it like this, what would the rights reaction have been had Obama pushed to end presidential term limits even if it wouldn’t affect him? It would have been psychotic outrage and the people most outraged are the ones attacking AOC for this and you can’t square those things.
The singular point of it preventing another FDR term is wrong, the point she was making stands. -
Probably about the same as the left's reaction to the claim that Trump is going to end Presidential term limits.allpurpleallgold said:
Is it? She was wrong that it was specifically to prevent another FDR term however I don’t think that makes her point wrong. It was in response to FDR and it was a political power move.HillsboroDuck said:
Doubling down is BallzFSGrundleStiltzkin said:
Think about it like this, what would the rights reaction have been had Obama pushed to end presidential term limits even if it wouldn’t affect him? It would have been psychotic outrage and the people most outraged are the ones attacking AOC for this and you can’t square those things.
The singular point of it preventing another FDR term is wrong, the point she was making stands. -
So fake but accurate, got it.allpurpleallgold said:
Is it? She was wrong that it was specifically to prevent another FDR term however I don’t think that makes her point wrong. It was in response to FDR and it was a political power move.HillsboroDuck said:
Doubling down is BallzFSGrundleStiltzkin said:
Think about it like this, what would the rights reaction have been had Obama pushed to end presidential term limits even if it wouldn’t affect him? It would have been psychotic outrage and the people most outraged are the ones attacking AOC for this and you can’t square those things.
The singular point of it preventing another FDR term is wrong, the point she was making stands.
