Cohen testimony
Comments
-
You're just a sad, angry little man arent youSledog said:
You missed the launch test? You're a big Huffpo foxkin and they didn't want you to know. Glad you're for Iran nuking Israel.MariotaTheGawd said:
You're a big talk radio guy, I can tellSledog said:
Don't forget the submarine launched missile that they are going to put it on. They tested it last week, That agreement sure held back their missile development.HardlyClothed said:
Still waiting on that Iranian nuke that was made technologically impossible by the JCPOARaceBannon said:
Yet you defend the Iran give away to this dayHHusky said:
Personally I’m kind of horrified that our badass “businessman” President has given away things to N Korea without getting a fucking thing in return. But he’s on your team and you couldn’t fucking care less.MikeDamone said:
After Clinton, Bush and Obama, what’s left to give?HHusky said:
Good point. No telling what Daddy will give away.89ute said:Way more important than the North Korea - US summit. Keep this good stuff coming!
18 moths ago retards were saying we? were on the brink of nuclear war because of Trump. Now that that’s not the truth, retards are mad that Trump is talking to N Korea and is “freindly with a dictator”
JFC
You couldn't suck Obama's dick hard enough and he gave away the farm in cash and allowed Iran to build a nuke
Now you're concerned. Got it.
Oh yeah they NEVER honored the agreement. Obunghole is a mooselimb sympathizer at best. He made this shit deal on purpose. -
Kinda sounds like the GOP questioners misrepresented the form they’ve been confronting him about . . . without showing it to him. Typical sleazy defense tactics.
-
Lol at this mumbling fuck from ohio
-
It's about scoring points with Daddy and looking good on Fox NewsHHusky said:Kinda sounds like the GOP questioners misrepresented the form they’ve been confronting him about . . . without showing it to him. Typical sleazy defense tactics.
-
I hear he’s great at county fairs though.MariotaTheGawd said:Lol at this mumbling fuck from ohio
-
There’s a lot you think that is objectively wrong. Including this.UW_Doog_Bot said:It seems like this should be a red letter day for the impeachment cheer squad and this thread is filled with bickering about other nonsense.
I thought this was the day the hammer dropped? Team LIPO wants to know. -
These congressclowns are all butthurt about Cohen going to make millions from book deals and movies. Cohen already said the Don is the greatest marketing machine. Tough shit fellas! Good for him!!
-
HHusky said:
Kinda sounds like the GOP questioners misrepresented the form they’ve been confronting him about . . . without showing it to him. Typical sleazy defense tactics.
Not one trumptard defending trump. Not a single one. -
Mr. Higgins is on Swaye's favorite juice. wow!
-
Jim Jordan was delegated a task for which he is clearly not the guy. Meadows trying to carry his water while making gross old man sounds for the microphone during the silences.
-
Talking points memo isn't released yet. Wait until about an hour after the testimony.CirrhosisDawg said:HHusky said:Kinda sounds like the GOP questioners misrepresented the form they’ve been confronting him about . . . without showing it to him. Typical sleazy defense tactics.
Not one trumptard defending trump. Not a single one. -
This is the white-trash first team now that gowdy, Issa and Chaffetz are gone.ramenduck said:Jim Jordan was delegated a task for which he is clearly not the guy. Meadows trying to carry his water while making gross old man sounds for the microphone during the silences.
-
Rep Lacy Clay: We are here today because America is tired of being lied to. Now allow me to ask the guy going to prison for lying some questions to get the truth.
-
Who was his client when lied to Congress?Dude61 said:Rep Lacy Clay: We are here today because America is tired of being lied to. Now allow me to ask the guy going to prison for lying some questions to get the truth.
-
-
Cohen is doing a better job of defending trump than these useless congressmen
-
I’d say that the distinct possibility of sentence reduction would be a much stronger motivator to do this than jilted employee.HHusky said:
I think anyone who doesn’t take his self-serving statements with a grain of salt is a fool. That said, I think he is genuinely horrified that this infomercial became a presidency and he’s pushing back so hard and specifically on this claim that he was a spurned job applicant that I would not be surprised to see this memo he referred to in the coming days.salemcoog said:
So you’re taking Cohen at his word that He is only doing this to shed light on the truth for the American people?MariotaTheGawd said:
convenient that one of Dear Leader's closest associates for years isn't credible nowGrundleStiltzkin said:Reading the stuff last night from Cohen's testimony, I thought Trump would have some serious problems following his appearance before Congress. I've watched 30 minutes of the testimony. Michael Cohen is not objectively credible. Each side is going to believe or disbelieve what they want. Opponents have always thought Trump was a racist scumbag, and supporters either don't care or don't believe. I don't see how this testimony changes anything. Wasserburg-Schultz tried to get #Collusion out of Cohen and that didn't go anywhere.
-
I'm hearing this whole testimony is Cohen getting back at Trump for not inviting him to the White House.MariotaTheGawd said:Cohen is doing a better job of defending trump than these useless congressmen
-
Distinct possibility? So congress is going to reduce his 3-year sentence? The sentencing judge will, not based on the law but because he showed up to Elijah Cummings committee meeting? How is this possible? Or are you confirming that you are a fucking retard?salemcoog said:
I’d say that the distinct possibility of sentence reduction would be a much stronger motivator to do this than jilted employer.HHusky said:
I think anyone who doesn’t take his self-serving statements with a grain of salt is a fool. That said, I think he is genuinely horrified that this infomercial became a presidency and he’s pushing back so hard and specifically on this claim that he was a spurned job applicant that I would not be surprised to see this memo he referred to in the coming days.salemcoog said:
So you’re taking Cohen at his word that He is only doing this to shed light on the truth for the American people?MariotaTheGawd said:
convenient that one of Dear Leader's closest associates for years isn't credible nowGrundleStiltzkin said:Reading the stuff last night from Cohen's testimony, I thought Trump would have some serious problems following his appearance before Congress. I've watched 30 minutes of the testimony. Michael Cohen is not objectively credible. Each side is going to believe or disbelieve what they want. Opponents have always thought Trump was a racist scumbag, and supporters either don't care or don't believe. I don't see how this testimony changes anything. Wasserburg-Schultz tried to get #Collusion out of Cohen and that didn't go anywhere.
-
Cohen today testified that attorney Lanny Davis, an old Clinton croney is working pro bono for him.
-
Jim Jordan I am sure has a cellar full of porn. That dude is creepy.ramenduck said:Jim Jordan was delegated a task for which he is clearly not the guy. Meadows trying to carry his water while making gross old man sounds for the microphone during the silences.
-
Congress won’t do it. But He is working with NY South on other investigations for possible sentence reduction. Certainly his testimony under oath here will be a factor in those investigations and whether He gets said reduction. But thank you for exhibiting the low info content that is a Hallmark for you on this board.CirrhosisDawg said:
Distinct possibility? So congress is going to reduce his 3-year sentence? The sentencing judge will, not based on the law but because he showed up to Elijah Cummings committee meeting? How is this possible? Or are you confirming that you are a fucking retard?salemcoog said:
I’d say that the distinct possibility of sentence reduction would be a much stronger motivator to do this than jilted employer.HHusky said:
I think anyone who doesn’t take his self-serving statements with a grain of salt is a fool. That said, I think he is genuinely horrified that this infomercial became a presidency and he’s pushing back so hard and specifically on this claim that he was a spurned job applicant that I would not be surprised to see this memo he referred to in the coming days.salemcoog said:
So you’re taking Cohen at his word that He is only doing this to shed light on the truth for the American people?MariotaTheGawd said:
convenient that one of Dear Leader's closest associates for years isn't credible nowGrundleStiltzkin said:Reading the stuff last night from Cohen's testimony, I thought Trump would have some serious problems following his appearance before Congress. I've watched 30 minutes of the testimony. Michael Cohen is not objectively credible. Each side is going to believe or disbelieve what they want. Opponents have always thought Trump was a racist scumbag, and supporters either don't care or don't believe. I don't see how this testimony changes anything. Wasserburg-Schultz tried to get #Collusion out of Cohen and that didn't go anywhere.
-
This is yuge!Dude61 said:Cohen today testified that attorney Lanny Davis, an old Clinton croney is working pro bono for him.
-
“Certainly?” Why would SDNY care about his Congressional testimony? I’m sure you can explain.salemcoog said:
Congress won’t do it. But He is working with NY South on other investigations for possible sentence reduction. Certainly his testimony under oath here will be a factor in those investigations and whether He gets said reduction. But thank you for exhibiting the low info content that is a Hallmark for you on this board.CirrhosisDawg said:
Distinct possibility? So congress is going to reduce his 3-year sentence? The sentencing judge will, not based on the law but because he showed up to Elijah Cummings committee meeting? How is this possible? Or are you confirming that you are a fucking retard?salemcoog said:
I’d say that the distinct possibility of sentence reduction would be a much stronger motivator to do this than jilted employer.HHusky said:
I think anyone who doesn’t take his self-serving statements with a grain of salt is a fool. That said, I think he is genuinely horrified that this infomercial became a presidency and he’s pushing back so hard and specifically on this claim that he was a spurned job applicant that I would not be surprised to see this memo he referred to in the coming days.salemcoog said:
So you’re taking Cohen at his word that He is only doing this to shed light on the truth for the American people?MariotaTheGawd said:
convenient that one of Dear Leader's closest associates for years isn't credible nowGrundleStiltzkin said:Reading the stuff last night from Cohen's testimony, I thought Trump would have some serious problems following his appearance before Congress. I've watched 30 minutes of the testimony. Michael Cohen is not objectively credible. Each side is going to believe or disbelieve what they want. Opponents have always thought Trump was a racist scumbag, and supporters either don't care or don't believe. I don't see how this testimony changes anything. Wasserburg-Schultz tried to get #Collusion out of Cohen and that didn't go anywhere.
-
Weird! The GOP is complaining about getting his written testimony two hours before the hearing. I read it last night before 10 PST. There's some kind of time-space continuum problem going on!
-
Correct procedure is that they had access to the testimony 24 hours before the witness is sworn in. But being that this was conceived from a failed coup attempt, it’s easy to understand why decorum wouldn’t matter here.HHusky said:Weird! The GOP is complaining about getting his written testimony two hours before the hearing. I read it last night before 10 PST. There's some kind of time-space continuum problem going on!
-
Im not working with the NYSD, so you would probably have to wait until those investigations conclude.CirrhosisDawg said:
“Certainly?” Why would SDNY care about his Congressional testimony? I’m sure you can explain.salemcoog said:
Congress won’t do it. But He is working with NY South on other investigations for possible sentence reduction. Certainly his testimony under oath here will be a factor in those investigations and whether He gets said reduction. But thank you for exhibiting the low info content that is a Hallmark for you on this board.CirrhosisDawg said:
Distinct possibility? So congress is going to reduce his 3-year sentence? The sentencing judge will, not based on the law but because he showed up to Elijah Cummings committee meeting? How is this possible? Or are you confirming that you are a fucking retard?salemcoog said:
I’d say that the distinct possibility of sentence reduction would be a much stronger motivator to do this than jilted employer.HHusky said:
I think anyone who doesn’t take his self-serving statements with a grain of salt is a fool. That said, I think he is genuinely horrified that this infomercial became a presidency and he’s pushing back so hard and specifically on this claim that he was a spurned job applicant that I would not be surprised to see this memo he referred to in the coming days.salemcoog said:
So you’re taking Cohen at his word that He is only doing this to shed light on the truth for the American people?MariotaTheGawd said:
convenient that one of Dear Leader's closest associates for years isn't credible nowGrundleStiltzkin said:Reading the stuff last night from Cohen's testimony, I thought Trump would have some serious problems following his appearance before Congress. I've watched 30 minutes of the testimony. Michael Cohen is not objectively credible. Each side is going to believe or disbelieve what they want. Opponents have always thought Trump was a racist scumbag, and supporters either don't care or don't believe. I don't see how this testimony changes anything. Wasserburg-Schultz tried to get #Collusion out of Cohen and that didn't go anywhere.
I am flattered that you believe me to be so omniscient, however. -
It's pretty weak sauce, though. Decorum is a sweet concept from a very different era.salemcoog said:
Correct procedure is that they had access to the testimony 24 hours before the witness is sworn in. But being that this all the was conceived from a failed coup attempt, it’s easy to understand why decorum wouldn’t matter here.HHusky said:Weird! The GOP is complaining about getting his written testimony two hours before the hearing. I read it last night before 10 PST. There's some kind of time-space continuum problem going on!
-
TheDemocrat party after all this, has nothing on Donny boy. What a joke. Nothing new here that no one already knew. Hates his boys....check.....racist......check......asshole.... check.....doesn't like the common man......check.
Cohen getting a movie deal....check
The congressclowns did get to say book deal / movie deal 30 times. Welcome to America! What do you expect?
-
I appreciate your concession that we've known Daddy is a criminal for ages. I recognize deplorables don't care.jecornel said:TheDemocrat party after all this, has nothing on Donny boy. What a joke. Nothing new here that no one already knew. Hates his boys....check.....racist......check......asshole.... check.....doesn't like the common man......check.
Cohen getting a movie deal....check
The congressclowns did get to say book deal / movie deal 30 times. Welcome to America! What do you expect?
