Good paying jobs update
Comments
-
No I'm saying there's a large contingent of the population in that community that didn't want Amazon there. Does it piss you off that politicians listened to their constituents now?RaceBannon said:Both sides are doing it?
Thanks for hopping on with that mealy mouthed pile of shit
How many people have you heard bitching about Amazon's take over of Seattle? I've heard a lot. Some people are glad Amazon is there, some hate it. -
The article said it had 70% support. Nothing ever gets 100%
You're not saying anything. That's the point el oh el read for comprehension you missed the context -
When the totality of your economic contribution is a dept. of education interest statement, and a w2 from waitressing.... you tend to think taxing the top will fix "the economy stupid" with an endless feedback loop of revenue.Dude61 said:Let the irony sink it: AOC wants to raise taxes on the wealthy to fund her utopian socialist agenda, but is also against wealthy people generating taxable income.
Once her constituents figure it out, they might realize that they would have been better off if AOC had stayed tending bar.
Own a business or actually produce something for the marketplace and you realize how her/these policies will continue to alienate the have-nots when the haves run elsewhere.
-
I think we found the nations first 150 month abortion. Your mother has to be banned from having metal hangers around you. Good lord.2001400ex said:Yeah you guys aren't obsessed and scared.
-
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
-
The varsity is hereallpurpleallgold said:People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was? -
I'm pretty sure it's the dem socialists who want to pick winners and losers in the economy. Free market advocates aren't in favor of corporate subsidy no matter how many times the socialists repeat the lie.allpurpleallgold said:People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
-
Well what if I didn’t want one of those High Paying Tech Jobs? What if I just wanted to be a waitress?RaceBannon said:
The varsity is hereallpurpleallgold said:People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was? -
Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.RaceBannon said:
The varsity is hereallpurpleallgold said:People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was? -
Sounds like my news source is lying to me. The 125,000 is sourced in the OP and confirmed by the dem leaders in NY. Former dem leaders I should say.allpurpleallgold said:
Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.RaceBannon said:
The varsity is hereallpurpleallgold said:People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was?





