The article said it had 70% support. Nothing ever gets 100%
You're not saying anything. That's the point el oh el read for comprehension you missed the context
There's polls saying 70% of the people want Medicare for all. Yet if that happened you'd go into convulsions and probably have a stroke if that happened.
Again no context.
What are the poll numbers when people are told that it will increase the taxes they have to pay and increase the waiting period for them to see a doctor?
Just like with the bullshit polling numbers surrounding the GND, it's fairly easy to get a high approval number for the program you're asking about when the questions list nothing but a series of appealing outcomes without mentioning a single drawback.
Would you be in favor of providing Medicare style healthcare coverage for every American?
Would you be in favor of providing Medicare style healthcare coverage for every American if it meant you had to give up your private insurance?
Poll those two question and you'll get vastly different responses. But you're both stupid and liar an thus you just continue to repeat your bullshit about how both of these proposal receive high polling numbers.
AOC definitely got some free pub. Right now that's good for her, but when the City of New York has to try and find a solution to their budget crises, this little episode is going to comeback and hurt her bigly.
Comments