Thanks for hopping on with that mealy mouthed pile of shit
No I'm saying there's a large contingent of the population in that community that didn't want Amazon there. Does it piss you off that politicians listened to their constituents now?
How many people have you heard bitching about Amazon's take over of Seattle? I've heard a lot. Some people are glad Amazon is there, some hate it.
Let the irony sink it: AOC wants to raise taxes on the wealthy to fund her utopian socialist agenda, but is also against wealthy people generating taxable income.
Once her constituents figure it out, they might realize that they would have been better off if AOC had stayed tending bar.
When the totality of your economic contribution is a dept. of education interest statement, and a w2 from waitressing.... you tend to think taxing the top will fix "the economy stupid" with an endless feedback loop of revenue.
Own a business or actually produce something for the marketplace and you realize how her/these policies will continue to alienate the have-nots when the haves run elsewhere.
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
The varsity is here
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
I'm pretty sure it's the dem socialists who want to pick winners and losers in the economy. Free market advocates aren't in favor of corporate subsidy no matter how many times the socialists repeat the lie.
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
The varsity is here
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was?
Well what if I didn’t want one of those High Paying Tech Jobs? What if I just wanted to be a waitress?
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
The varsity is here
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was?
Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
The varsity is here
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was?
Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.
Sounds like my news source is lying to me. The 125,000 is sourced in the OP and confirmed by the dem leaders in NY. Former dem leaders I should say.
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
The varsity is here
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was?
Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.
Sounds like my news source is lying to me. The 125,000 is sourced in the OP and confirmed by the dem leaders in NY. Former dem leaders I should say.
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
The varsity is here
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was?
Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.
Sounds like my news source is lying to me. The 125,000 is sourced in the OP and confirmed by the dem leaders in NY. Former dem leaders I should say.
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
The varsity is here
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was?
Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.
Sounds like my news source is lying to me. The 125,000 is sourced in the OP and confirmed by the dem leaders in NY. Former dem leaders I should say.
You literally quoted it saying 25,000 jobs.
I literally did el oh el
I fucked up.
There is a “theoretically it could create 125,000 jobs” argument out there. It’s not complete bullshit.
People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.
The varsity is here
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was?
Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.
Sounds like my news source is lying to me. The 125,000 is sourced in the OP and confirmed by the dem leaders in NY. Former dem leaders I should say.
The article said it had 70% support. Nothing ever gets 100%
You're not saying anything. That's the point el oh el read for comprehension you missed the context
There's polls saying 70% of the people want Medicare for all. Yet if that happened you'd go into convulsions and probably have a stroke if that happened.
The article said it had 70% support. Nothing ever gets 100%
You're not saying anything. That's the point el oh el read for comprehension you missed the context
There's polls saying 70% of the people want Medicare for all. Yet if that happened you'd go into convulsions and probably have a stroke if that happened.
Florida and Texas are praising her like you praise Haden.
3 Billion in tax benefits is a pretty good trade off for an estimated 27 billion in wealth added to the local economy. Not smart considering the state is in the middle of a budget problem.
Of course it is it's looney tunes lefties running the place!
The article said it had 70% support. Nothing ever gets 100%
You're not saying anything. That's the point el oh el read for comprehension you missed the context
There's polls saying 70% of the people want Medicare for all. Yet if that happened you'd go into convulsions and probably have a stroke if that happened.
Again no context.
What are the poll numbers when people are told that it will increase the taxes they have to pay and increase the waiting period for them to see a doctor?
Just like with the bullshit polling numbers surrounding the GND, it's fairly easy to get a high approval number for the program you're asking about when the questions list nothing but a series of appealing outcomes without mentioning a single drawback.
Would you be in favor of providing Medicare style healthcare coverage for every American?
Would you be in favor of providing Medicare style healthcare coverage for every American if it meant you had to give up your private insurance?
Poll those two question and you'll get vastly different responses. But you're both stupid and liar an thus you just continue to repeat your bullshit about how both of these proposal receive high polling numbers.
AOC definitely got some free pub. Right now that's good for her, but when the City of New York has to try and find a solution to their budget crises, this little episode is going to comeback and hurt her bigly.
Comments
How many people have you heard bitching about Amazon's take over of Seattle? I've heard a lot. Some people are glad Amazon is there, some hate it.
You're not saying anything. That's the point el oh el read for comprehension you missed the context
Own a business or actually produce something for the marketplace and you realize how her/these policies will continue to alienate the have-nots when the haves run elsewhere.
There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.
Isn't that what this was?
I fucked up.
its you and no one else
25,000 sounds small since I threw 125,000 out there but I don't think it is insignificant
What are the poll numbers when people are told that it will increase the taxes they have to pay and increase the waiting period for them to see a doctor?
Just like with the bullshit polling numbers surrounding the GND, it's fairly easy to get a high approval number for the program you're asking about when the questions list nothing but a series of appealing outcomes without mentioning a single drawback.
Would you be in favor of providing Medicare style healthcare coverage for every American?
Would you be in favor of providing Medicare style healthcare coverage for every American if it meant you had to give up your private insurance?
Poll those two question and you'll get vastly different responses. But you're both stupid and liar an thus you just continue to repeat your bullshit about how both of these proposal receive high polling numbers.