Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

So how many of you AOC fans agree with this statement

12346»

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    She’s selling envy, trying to stoke the Mob. nothing more.

    And that has worked for others. She's an idiot, or rather a useful idiot, but that doesn't mean she won't be effective. She's photogenic, the MSM is head over heals in love with her, and we've had a few decades of k-12 "education" run by people who think like her and have been "educating" people to think as she does. They're becoming voters now. Her Marxist philosophy is not only acceptable, but preferable to many of these young and easily influenced "minds". She and her ilk will make a dent, that's my prediction.
    Please to be explaining Marxism then relating that to her plans.
    AOC's 70% marginal tax rate on high earners is right out of Marx' Communist Manifesto. Money is a collective product according to Marx’s doctrine. The earning of money and acquiring of private property is the result of “the united action of all members of society.” You didn’t build that (Thanks Obama) AOC wraps it in vague terms like social justice, but in reality it is economic equality for all, regardless of their efforts to earn it. In her socially just society, the government collects the money and then distributes it evenly to all. Her Green Deal is just another New Deal works project, that has so far been rejected at the committee level by Pelosi.
    Who is talking about acquiring private property for the government?

    You do realize the context of "you didn't build that" right? He was talking about the infrastructure, but it does make a great Fox news talking point.

    Who is asking for the government to collect money is distribute it evenly?

    Again, please to be explaining how Marxism relates to AOC policies.
    Money is private property. HTH
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,579 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    HHusky said:

    Taxation isn’t socialist or communist. Remind us which countries don’t have taxation, won’t you?

    Are you a Hondo alt?
    Bham
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    She’s selling envy, trying to stoke the Mob. nothing more.

    And that has worked for others. She's an idiot, or rather a useful idiot, but that doesn't mean she won't be effective. She's photogenic, the MSM is head over heals in love with her, and we've had a few decades of k-12 "education" run by people who think like her and have been "educating" people to think as she does. They're becoming voters now. Her Marxist philosophy is not only acceptable, but preferable to many of these young and easily influenced "minds". She and her ilk will make a dent, that's my prediction.
    Please to be explaining Marxism then relating that to her plans.
    AOC's 70% marginal tax rate on high earners is right out of Marx' Communist Manifesto. Money is a collective product according to Marx’s doctrine. The earning of money and acquiring of private property is the result of “the united action of all members of society.” You didn’t build that (Thanks Obama) AOC wraps it in vague terms like social justice, but in reality it is economic equality for all, regardless of their efforts to earn it. In her socially just society, the government collects the money and then distributes it evenly to all. Her Green Deal is just another New Deal works project, that has so far been rejected at the committee level by Pelosi.
    Who is talking about acquiring private property for the government?

    You do realize the context of "you didn't build that" right? He was talking about the infrastructure, but it does make a great Fox news talking point.

    Who is asking for the government to collect money is distribute it evenly?

    Again, please to be explaining how Marxism relates to AOC policies.
    Money is private property. HTH
    So every country is Marxist. Are you going to move to Mars to escape it?
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,554 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Dude61 said:

    2001400ex said:

    She’s selling envy, trying to stoke the Mob. nothing more.

    And that has worked for others. She's an idiot, or rather a useful idiot, but that doesn't mean she won't be effective. She's photogenic, the MSM is head over heals in love with her, and we've had a few decades of k-12 "education" run by people who think like her and have been "educating" people to think as she does. They're becoming voters now. Her Marxist philosophy is not only acceptable, but preferable to many of these young and easily influenced "minds". She and her ilk will make a dent, that's my prediction.
    Please to be explaining Marxism then relating that to her plans.
    AOC's 70% marginal tax rate on high earners is right out of Marx' Communist Manifesto. Money is a collective product according to Marx’s doctrine. The earning of money and acquiring of private property is the result of “the united action of all members of society.” You didn’t build that (Thanks Obama) AOC wraps it in vague terms like social justice, but in reality it is economic equality for all, regardless of their efforts to earn it. In her socially just society, the government collects the money and then distributes it evenly to all. Her Green Deal is just another New Deal works project, that has so far been rejected at the committee level by Pelosi.
    Who is talking about acquiring private property for the government?

    You do realize the context of "you didn't build that" right? He was talking about the infrastructure, but it does make a great Fox news talking point.

    Who is asking for the government to collect money is distribute it evenly?

    Again, please to be explaining how Marxism relates to AOC policies.
    but but but The ROADS! Who will build the roads!



    This is the best deflection you've got? At least make it a deflection leading somewhere you want to go.