Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
So how many of you AOC fans agree with this statement
Comments
-
And that has worked for others. She's an idiot, or rather a useful idiot, but that doesn't mean she won't be effective. She's photogenic, the MSM is head over heals in love with her, and we've had a few decades of k-12 "education" run by people who think like her and have been "educating" people to think as she does. They're becoming voters now. Her Marxist philosophy is not only acceptable, but preferable to many of these young and easily influenced "minds". She and her ilk will make a dent, that's my prediction.sarktastic said:She’s selling envy, trying to stoke the Mob. nothing more.
-
Build that strawman dumbfuck.2001400ex said:
I'm hearing it was an increase in minimum wage that caused businesses use of technology. Now you are saying technology has been increasing business productivity for years?MikeDamone said:
The people who are getting ripped off should quit.allpurpleallgold said:
Workers wages have been stagnant for 50 years. Their productivity has sky rocketed. Profits have sky rocketed. CEO pay has sky rocketed. We call that stealing the labor of others.SFGbob said:
My problem isn't that she was making it a moral argument my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I was just asking if you agreed with it. It's immoral in my book to steal the labor of others. You being a Rat, you and your party have a long, long history supporting the stealing of labor in others. The fact that she was making some kind of moral argument isn't what bothered me.HHusky said:It's a sophomoric statement, blob. Of course, you couch your economic arguments as moral arguments too, so you're just the opposite side of the same counterfeit coin.
Workers productively didn’t skyrocket. The productivity of technology skyrocketed. Workerrs, including CEOS, are still subject to supply and demand. -
Please to be explaining Marxism then relating that to her plans.Southerndawg said:
And that has worked for others. She's an idiot, or rather a useful idiot, but that doesn't mean she won't be effective. She's photogenic, the MSM is head over heals in love with her, and we've had a few decades of k-12 "education" run by people who think like her and have been "educating" people to think as she does. They're becoming voters now. Her Marxist philosophy is not only acceptable, but preferable to many of these young and easily influenced "minds". She and her ilk will make a dent, that's my prediction.sarktastic said:She’s selling envy, trying to stoke the Mob. nothing more.
-
When you lost the argument, you throw out strawman and don't discuss it further.MikeDamone said:
Build that strawman dumbfuck.2001400ex said:
I'm hearing it was an increase in minimum wage that caused businesses use of technology. Now you are saying technology has been increasing business productivity for years?MikeDamone said:
The people who are getting ripped off should quit.allpurpleallgold said:
Workers wages have been stagnant for 50 years. Their productivity has sky rocketed. Profits have sky rocketed. CEO pay has sky rocketed. We call that stealing the labor of others.SFGbob said:
My problem isn't that she was making it a moral argument my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I was just asking if you agreed with it. It's immoral in my book to steal the labor of others. You being a Rat, you and your party have a long, long history supporting the stealing of labor in others. The fact that she was making some kind of moral argument isn't what bothered me.HHusky said:It's a sophomoric statement, blob. Of course, you couch your economic arguments as moral arguments too, so you're just the opposite side of the same counterfeit coin.
Workers productively didn’t skyrocket. The productivity of technology skyrocketed. Workerrs, including CEOS, are still subject to supply and demand. -
What argument? The discussion in this thread or the one you made up in your head?2001400ex said:
When you lost the argument, you throw out strawman and don't discuss it further.MikeDamone said:
Build that strawman dumbfuck.2001400ex said:
I'm hearing it was an increase in minimum wage that caused businesses use of technology. Now you are saying technology has been increasing business productivity for years?MikeDamone said:
The people who are getting ripped off should quit.allpurpleallgold said:
Workers wages have been stagnant for 50 years. Their productivity has sky rocketed. Profits have sky rocketed. CEO pay has sky rocketed. We call that stealing the labor of others.SFGbob said:
My problem isn't that she was making it a moral argument my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I was just asking if you agreed with it. It's immoral in my book to steal the labor of others. You being a Rat, you and your party have a long, long history supporting the stealing of labor in others. The fact that she was making some kind of moral argument isn't what bothered me.HHusky said:It's a sophomoric statement, blob. Of course, you couch your economic arguments as moral arguments too, so you're just the opposite side of the same counterfeit coin.
Workers productively didn’t skyrocket. The productivity of technology skyrocketed. Workerrs, including CEOS, are still subject to supply and demand. -
Jesus. Once you start respecting and putting hope and faith into a politician, you know you are a stupid mark who deserves to be fucked over.
-
Oh shit for brains is back
-
Yeah, they need to wield state power and start confiscating wealth and killing off the rich.HardlyClothed said:
The disclosure requirement is the perfect enscapulation of the failures of modern liberalism. As if simply making public the pay disparity would create a change instead of doing actual politics and using political power to change it. But Democrats since Carter have been terrified of actually wielding state power for their constituents benefit.PurpleThrobber said:
There's a new disclosure requirement for public companies that now require Executive pay be compared to the median of the workers. The hope is that the market will recognize the robber barons and punish their share price.RaceBannon said:
There was Clinton era law that capped CEO pay so they went to stock options which pay better and are taxed lowerPurpleThrobber said:Billionaires are fine.
I wouldn't necessarily have a problem if there were regulations enacted limiting CEO pay to a multiple of some function of the mean employee salaries. Some of those cats are just raking in dough for having minions and not doing shit. I've met them - they aren't worth 100,000 times the wage of a line worker. They just aren't.
I don't have an issue if their rewards are commensurate with Share Price or some such measurement.
I find AOC likes to drop the 'immoral' line regularly. Eventually that just wears off.
And she best be careful with playing the morality card too often because you know her nude pics/sex with goats videos are being held in a remote server somewhere just waiting to be unleashed on the world.
That showed them
Why do people get paid so much? Because they can
That's the hope any way.
As you say, they'll figure out ways around it.
But it looks like that’s starting to change at least. -
The sad thing is that you know this dipshit thought this was a killer response.2001400ex said:
Please to be explaining Marxism then relating that to her plans.Southerndawg said:
And that has worked for others. She's an idiot, or rather a useful idiot, but that doesn't mean she won't be effective. She's photogenic, the MSM is head over heals in love with her, and we've had a few decades of k-12 "education" run by people who think like her and have been "educating" people to think as she does. They're becoming voters now. Her Marxist philosophy is not only acceptable, but preferable to many of these young and easily influenced "minds". She and her ilk will make a dent, that's my prediction.sarktastic said:She’s selling envy, trying to stoke the Mob. nothing more.
-
Great moments in history where state power was wielded on behalf of the proletariat, I mean the constituents.
