So I woke up this morning
Comments
-
I agree with this Race, but I like the angry anti-recruiting false premise Race.RaceBannon said:and thought it was just one week ago today that I got up all excited to go watch the worst Husky Rose Bowl performance of my lifetime.
Then I thought about what I watched last night
Then I decided to pick some message bored fights on coaching, recruiting, and how do we find a way to beat Cal.
If we don't at least get as excited about branding and recruiting as Oregon does and we don't, how are we going to Dabo our way to the top? We have as good of a DC as Venables. I really believe this. But we're miles to go on offense both in coaching and players. I'll settle for a REAL O line for now.
The biggest disappointment in the 5 years so far is the inability to steal even one win or to show up ready to play every week or to have some sort of competent special teams
I do know it can change and we are recruiting better but it doesn't matter what we? think it matters what Petermen's bosses think
If you have a coach that can beat better teams before we are even in players you have an elite coach. Pete is a conundrum. I just hope he isn't Kirk Ferentz
That's how dark my mood is -
you don'tRaceBannon said:and thought it was just one week ago today that I got up all excited to go watch the worst Husky Rose Bowl performance of my lifetime.
Then I thought about what I watched last night
Then I decided to pick some message bored fights on coaching, recruiting, and how do we find a way to beat Cal.
If we don't at least get as excited about branding and recruiting as Oregon does and we don't, how are we going to Dabo our way to the top? We have as good of a DC as Venables. I really believe this. But we're miles to go on offense both in coaching and players. I'll settle for a REAL O line for now.
The biggest disappointment in the 5 years so far is the inability to steal even one win or to show up ready to play every week or to have some sort of competent special teams
I do know it can change and we are recruiting better but it doesn't matter what we? think it matters what Petermen's bosses think
If you have a coach that can beat better teams before we are even in players you have an elite coach. Pete is a conundrum. I just hope he isn't Kirk Ferentz
That's how dark my mood is -
Elite coaches should be able to get atleast one upset/surprise/big win in 5 years, even if they luck into it.
even with slightly deficient talent
Pete used to do it at Boise.
Here? Not so much.
UW will never have the institutional culture, structure or support that the schools in the South have created. NEVER.
The likelihood that UW will ever achieve a top 10 composite roster regularly better than Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia, FSU, USC, Clemson, LSU, Michigan, UT, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Florida, or Penn State is rather low.
It was always going to take top 5 coaching, mixed with top 15ish recruiting talent to win big at UW. It was always going to take a top tier coach overcoming a small as possible talent deficiency to win big, like BSU over Oregon or Oklahoma.
Recruiting matters, it matters a lot, there is room to improve, but the ceiling really isnt that far away.
Coaching matters, it matters a lot, so far Pete is miles away from what people thought his coaching ceiling was.
If Pete needs top 5-10 recruited talent on the roster to win a big game NOW then he is never going to win a big game and he's not an elite coach. No ammount of UW recruiting at its ceiling is going to change that. -
That's glove taking off type of talk.creepycoug said:
Yup. I've been around a lot longer than you have Tonto. You'd do well to remember that.ApostleofGrief said:we?
I was there! when we were shit-talking before the 2000 UW/Miami game. While you were still dating cheerleaders. -
Race woke up this mornin',
All that love had gone.
What? You lost to fuckin' Cal?!
-
Are their Twitter accounts blocked too? Do they feature hashtags from other schools?CaptainPJ said:Heard today that Clemson has 5 people in the AD whose sole job it is to market the program and reach out to recruits via social media.
That is literally all they are paid to do all day, every day.
Did you hear their players recruiting kids at the post-game last night? -
After five years now, there is a chance we're fooling ourselves about PeteHouhusky said:Elite coaches should be able to get atleast one upset/surprise/big win in 5 years, even if they luck into it.
even with slightly deficient talent
Pete used to do it at Boise.
Here? Not so much.
UW will never have the institutional culture, structure or support that the schools in the South have created. NEVER.
The likelihood that UW will ever achieve a top 10 composite roster regularly better than Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia, FSU, USC, Clemson, LSU, Michigan, UT, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Florida, or Penn State is rather low.
It was always going to take top 5 coaching, mixed with top 15ish recruiting talent to win big at UW. It was always going to take a top tier coach overcoming a small as possible talent deficiency to win big, like BSU over Oregon or Oklahoma.
Recruiting matters, it matters a lot, there is room to improve, but the ceiling really isnt that far away.
Coaching matters, it matters a lot, so far Pete is miles away from what people thought his coaching ceiling was.
If Pete needs top 5-10 recruited talent on the roster to win a big game NOW then he is never going to win a big game and he's not an elite coach. No ammount of UW recruiting at its ceiling is going to change that. -
A world exists.DerekJohnson said:
After five years now, there is a chance we're fooling ourselves about PeteHouhusky said:Elite coaches should be able to get atleast one upset/surprise/big win in 5 years, even if they luck into it.
even with slightly deficient talent
Pete used to do it at Boise.
Here? Not so much.
UW will never have the institutional culture, structure or support that the schools in the South have created. NEVER.
The likelihood that UW will ever achieve a top 10 composite roster regularly better than Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia, FSU, USC, Clemson, LSU, Michigan, UT, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Florida, or Penn State is rather low.
It was always going to take top 5 coaching, mixed with top 15ish recruiting talent to win big at UW. It was always going to take a top tier coach overcoming a small as possible talent deficiency to win big, like BSU over Oregon or Oklahoma.
Recruiting matters, it matters a lot, there is room to improve, but the ceiling really isnt that far away.
Coaching matters, it matters a lot, so far Pete is miles away from what people thought his coaching ceiling was.
If Pete needs top 5-10 recruited talent on the roster to win a big game NOW then he is never going to win a big game and he's not an elite coach. No ammount of UW recruiting at its ceiling is going to change that.
-
Doesn’t UW have some cunt in the athletic department that tweets #scoduck and some bullishlt? Send that bitch packing. FuckCaptainPJ said:Heard today that Clemson has 5 people in the AD whose sole job it is to market the program and reach out to recruits via social media.
That is literally all they are paid to do all day, every day.
Did you hear their players recruiting kids at the post-game last night? -
MikeDamone said:
Doesn’t UW have some cunt in the athletic department that tweets #scoduck and some bullishlt? Send that bitch packing. FuckCaptainPJ said:Heard today that Clemson has 5 people in the AD whose sole job it is to market the program and reach out to recruits via social media.
That is literally all they are paid to do all day, every day.
Did you hear their players recruiting kids at the post-game last night?
