How do you explain the need for a wall to liberals?

2001400ex

Pitchfork51 said:

The main argument is that 50% of illegal immigration is people overstaying.

So therefore stopping the other 50 is pointless.


Jesus fuck.

No that's not the argument. Explain how this $5 billion will actually have a meaningful effect on the other 50.

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

State the lie you fucking Kunt?

I have but you can't read. The nuclear option is good enough to approve a supreme court justice but not to pass $5 billion in spending?

Harry Reid already used the nuclear option for judicial appointments. The Republicans just returned the favor. The filibuster still exists for legislation.

And I read just fine.

That legislation doesn’t have the 60 votes needed for passage in the Senate, so Trump urged Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to resort to the “nuclear option” and change the rules to pass his pet project with just a simple 51-vote majority.

Now why are you such a dishonest piece of shit Hondo?

Dishonest? What in your post shows anything about me being dishonest? Answer the question. Why is the nuclear option good enough for a supreme Court Justice but not Trump's wall? I mean it can be done and if Republicans actually want to do it, why don't they?

A boot right in your lying dishonest Kunt, that's the only response you deserve Hondo. The filibuster for Judicial appointments was destroyed by Harry Reid. Because the GOP understands that blowing up the filibuster for legislation set a very dangerous precedent they aren't willing to be as irresponsible as the Rats. As of right now under the existing rules the GOP still needs 60 votes. You claimed that statement is a lie. As usual, the only liar is you.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

State the lie you fucking Kunt?

I have but you can't read. The nuclear option is good enough to approve a supreme court justice but not to pass $5 billion in spending?

Harry Reid already used the nuclear option for judicial appointments. The Republicans just returned the favor. The filibuster still exists for legislation.

And I read just fine.

That legislation doesn’t have the 60 votes needed for passage in the Senate, so Trump urged Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to resort to the “nuclear option” and change the rules to pass his pet project with just a simple 51-vote majority.

Now why are you such a dishonest piece of shit Hondo?

Dishonest? What in your post shows anything about me being dishonest? Answer the question. Why is the nuclear option good enough for a supreme Court Justice but not Trump's wall? I mean it can be done and if Republicans actually want to do it, why don't they?

A boot right in your lying dishonest Kunt, that's the only response you deserve Hondo. The filibuster for Judicial appointments was destroyed by Harry Reid. Because the GOP understands that blowing up the filibuster for legislation set a very dangerous precedent they aren't willing to be as irresponsible as the Rats. As of right now under the existing rules the GOP still needs 60 votes. You claimed that statement is a lie. As usual, the only liar is you.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

Pitchfork51 said:

The main argument is that 50% of illegal immigration is people overstaying.

So therefore stopping the other 50 is pointless.


Jesus fuck.

No that's not the argument. Explain how this $5 billion will actually have a meaningful effect on the other 50.

Schumer must think the $5 billion would have an meaning effect since he voted for the secure fence act. Or he’s against it because Trump.

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

Pitchfork51 said:

The main argument is that 50% of illegal immigration is people overstaying.

So therefore stopping the other 50 is pointless.


Jesus fuck.

No that's not the argument. Explain how this $5 billion will actually have a meaningful effect on the other 50.

Schumer must think the $5 billion would have an meaning effect since he voted for the secure fence act. Or he’s against it because Trump.

Engrish please.

DoogieMcDoogerson

Hey dipshit....

https://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2018/aug/24/kevin-mccarthy/mostly-true-visa-overstays-account-half-all-people/

I say we go fix this, too. Require ID for everything and boot those folks out who have overstayed their welcome.

UWhuskytskeet said:

How do you explain to people that like to waste money on ineffective walls that the majority of illegal immigrants simply overstayed their visas?

sarktastic

Visa overstay seems simple. Deny ID, deny airport/ train station entry, deny employment, deny school for children, deny US PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, deny all social benefits, without current visa. Ramp up funding for Visa processing staff.

2001400ex

sarktastic said:

Visa overstay seems simple. Deny ID, deny airport/ train station entry, deny employment, deny school for children, deny US PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, deny all social benefits, without current visa. Ramp up funding for Visa processing staff.

There are rules in place for all of that. Tho the Trump admin is not doing a good job enforcing them as there's still 11 million illegals here.

sarktastic

There are rules for the border you don’t seem to want to obey

2001400ex

sarktastic said:

There are rules for the border you don’t seem to want to obey

Link? Where have I ever said I want an open border?