WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?
Jesus fuck.
I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
hey, i am just here to regurgitate what has been said before. but talk to leach he squeezes more wins that peterman
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Go fuck yourself.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5. --then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
I think in switching the colors on the schools that didn’t meet the expected total of recruits (grey and red), the chart no longer accurately repesents the data. The first ones were better
I think in switching the colors on the schools that didn’t meet the expected total of recruits (grey and red), the chart no longer accurately repesents the data. The first ones were better
I think in switching the colors on the schools that didn’t meet the expected total of recruits (grey and red), the chart no longer accurately repesents the data. The first ones were better
I think in switching the colors on the schools that didn’t meet the expected total of recruits (grey and red), the chart no longer accurately repesents the data. The first ones were better
I think in switching the colors on the schools that didn’t meet the expected total of recruits (grey and red), the chart no longer accurately repesents the data. The first ones were better
WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?
Jesus fuck.
I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
Why did you just have to shit on my core competency like that?
I think in switching the colors on the schools that didn’t meet the expected total of recruits (grey and red), the chart no longer accurately repesents the data. The first ones were better
Comments
Also source data in a google drive or Dropbox too
:^)