Home› The Fisch Bowl (Recruiting)

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who Develops Talent Best in the Pac-12?

Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
in The Fisch Bowl (Recruiting)




Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Who gets most wins out of their stars?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    good chit, but some recruits and their families will always take the coffee cup in the hand versus two in the bush...some dads won't fly; just won't....some recruits will always want to be closer to home (Bama) and some recruits will always enjoy recruiting more than getting developed.

    another way of saying i don't think we really have much more upside than we're hitting now.

    just my opinion; don't twist.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • animateanimate Member Posts: 4,240
    You should do a HH graph showing the expected fucktardness of HH denizens relative to their length of stay here ... just for fun.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    Dennis_DeYoung said:





    Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

    Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
    What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,828 Swaye's Wigwam
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:





    Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

    Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
    What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
    Go fuck yourself.

    To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

    But if you must know...

    --so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
    --then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

    Then...

    EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

    Like a fucking expected value calculation.

    How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

    I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.


    Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:





    Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

    Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
    What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
    Go fuck yourself.

    To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

    But if you must know...

    --so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
    --then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

    Then...

    EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

    Like a fucking expected value calculation.

    How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

    I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.


    Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY.
    OH SHIT I JUST PASSED MY JUNIOR YEAR STATS CLASS!!!! WOOOOO!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.