Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Go fuck yourself.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5. --then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY.
OH SHIT I JUST PASSED MY JUNIOR YEAR STATS CLASS!!!! WOOOOO!!!!
That's actually part of what I love about it. I work with a lot of engineers that can't manage the principal of KISS to save their lives.
It also leaves a lot less room for people wishing to criticize your methodology. "But, but, but, [fill in cognitive bias]"
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Go fuck yourself.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5. --then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?
Jesus fuck.
I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?
Jesus fuck.
I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?
Jesus fuck.
I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
Sounds dangerously close to a Rule 1 violation against Faggot Hollowmen.
WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?
Jesus fuck.
I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?
Jesus fuck.
I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Go fuck yourself.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5. --then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Thanks for showing your work. I always assume everyone is an idiot. Works pretty well.
You're making assumptions about the relationship between recruiting rankings and all-conference teams so maybe you should see how that relationship holds up historically.
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Go fuck yourself.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5. --then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Thanks for showing your work. I always assume everyone is an idiot. Works pretty well.
You're making assumptions about the relationship between recruiting rankings and all-conference teams so maybe you should see how that relationship holds up historically.
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Go fuck yourself.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5. --then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Thanks for showing your work. I always assume everyone is an idiot. Works pretty well.
You're making assumptions about the relationship between recruiting rankings and all-conference teams so maybe you should see how that relationship holds up historically.
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Go fuck yourself.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5. --then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
I think in switching the colors on the schools that didn’t meet the expected total of recruits (grey and red), the chart no longer accurately repesents the data. The first ones were better
I think in switching the colors on the schools that didn’t meet the expected total of recruits (grey and red), the chart no longer accurately repesents the data. The first ones were better
Comments
It also leaves a lot less room for people wishing to criticize your methodology. "But, but, but, [fill in cognitive bias]"
Jesus fuck.
I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
You're making assumptions about the relationship between recruiting rankings and all-conference teams so maybe you should see how that relationship holds up historically.
(*ducks*)
I think in switching the colors on the schools that didn’t meet the expected total of recruits (grey and red), the chart no longer accurately repesents the data.
The first ones were better