I just found out I am a Jack Husky. I'm fine with that. I am born and raised in Los Angeles and still live here. But I grew up watching the dawgs go to the Rose Bowl and every Saturday 12:30 kick offs. In the 90's. They became my team. I naturally hated the Trojans and Bruins. Not only because they sucked but because the dawgs were always on TV and it's what I could watch. I lived in the hood growing up and you could even get Husky hats at the local liquor stores!
Ever since the drop off in wins. It's like the UW disappeared. You can't buy a UW hat in any mall let alone hood spot.
My point is that recruiting matters. More wins more TV time ,especially with LA schools down more recruits will be actual UW fans and can be more easily recruited nationally. That means also more Jack Huskies.
You can get Alabama crap at any Mall in LA. Before you say of course. You can also get Seahawks shit too and it's been a while since they were any good. My point is that if you stay a little relavent the Jack Husky movement will get stronger that means fans for life and future recruits!
I have more stories. Of being a dwag fan in LA and how sad I was when I went to Seattle. Also how I might have actually been the one that got a actual UW recruit to commit. Maybe another day for now UW Motherfuckers!!!
I’ve been going to games since 1968. I think I’ve been to around 400 games. Chose another college for good reasons. I don’t give a fuck what any dip fuck Coog thinks. I was accepted into both schools. Whatever.
I just found out I am a Jack Husky. I'm fine with that. I am born and raised in Los Angeles and still live here. But I grew up watching the dawgs go to the Rose Bowl and every Saturday 12:30 kick offs. In the 90's. They became my team. I naturally hated the Trojans and Bruins. Not only because they sucked but because the dawgs were always on TV and it's what I could watch. I lived in the hood growing up and you could even get Husky hats at the local liquor stores!
Ever since the drop off in wins. It's like the UW disappeared. You can't buy a UW hat in any mall let alone hood spot.
My point is that recruiting matters. More wins more TV time ,especially with LA schools down more recruits will be actual UW fans and can be more easily recruited nationally. That means also more Jack Huskies.
You can get Alabama crap at any Mall in LA. Before you say of course. You can also get Seahawks shit too and it's been a while since they were any good. My point is that if you stay a little relavent the Jack Husky movement will get stronger that means fans for life and future recruits!
I have more stories. Of being a dwag fan in LA and how sad I was when I went to Seattle. Also how I might have actually been the one that got a actual UW recruit to commit. Maybe another day for now UW Motherfuckers!!!
I’ve been going to games since 1968. I think I’ve been to around 400 games. Chose another college for good reasons. I don’t give a fuck what any dip fuck Coog thinks. I was accepted into both schools. Whatever.
And you ended up at Lowes
Yeah he ended at Lowe’s but he’s in charge of the toilets. That’s quite a respectable position to be in.
I just found out I am a Jack Husky. I'm fine with that. I am born and raised in Los Angeles and still live here. But I grew up watching the dawgs go to the Rose Bowl and every Saturday 12:30 kick offs. In the 90's. They became my team. I naturally hated the Trojans and Bruins. Not only because they sucked but because the dawgs were always on TV and it's what I could watch. I lived in the hood growing up and you could even get Husky hats at the local liquor stores!
Ever since the drop off in wins. It's like the UW disappeared. You can't buy a UW hat in any mall let alone hood spot.
My point is that recruiting matters. More wins more TV time ,especially with LA schools down more recruits will be actual UW fans and can be more easily recruited nationally. That means also more Jack Huskies.
You can get Alabama crap at any Mall in LA. Before you say of course. You can also get Seahawks shit too and it's been a while since they were any good. My point is that if you stay a little relavent the Jack Husky movement will get stronger that means fans for life and future recruits!
I have more stories. Of being a dwag fan in LA and how sad I was when I went to Seattle. Also how I might have actually been the one that got a actual UW recruit to commit. Maybe another day for now UW Motherfuckers!!!
I’ve been going to games since 1968. I think I’ve been to around 400 games. Chose another college for good reasons. I don’t give a fuck what any dip fuck Coog thinks. I was accepted into both schools. Whatever.
And you ended up at Lowes
Yeah he ended at Lowe’s but he’s in charge of the toilets. That’s quite a respectable position to be in.
I just found out I am a Jack Husky. I'm fine with that. I am born and raised in Los Angeles and still live here. But I grew up watching the dawgs go to the Rose Bowl and every Saturday 12:30 kick offs. In the 90's. They became my team. I naturally hated the Trojans and Bruins. Not only because they sucked but because the dawgs were always on TV and it's what I could watch. I lived in the hood growing up and you could even get Husky hats at the local liquor stores!
Ever since the drop off in wins. It's like the UW disappeared. You can't buy a UW hat in any mall let alone hood spot.
My point is that recruiting matters. More wins more TV time ,especially with LA schools down more recruits will be actual UW fans and can be more easily recruited nationally. That means also more Jack Huskies.
You can get Alabama crap at any Mall in LA. Before you say of course. You can also get Seahawks shit too and it's been a while since they were any good. My point is that if you stay a little relavent the Jack Husky movement will get stronger that means fans for life and future recruits!
I have more stories. Of being a dwag fan in LA and how sad I was when I went to Seattle. Also how I might have actually been the one that got a actual UW recruit to commit. Maybe another day for now UW Motherfuckers!!!
I’ve been going to games since 1968. I think I’ve been to around 400 games. Chose another college for good reasons. I don’t give a fuck what any dip fuck Coog thinks. I was accepted into both schools. Whatever.
And you ended up at Lowes
Lets not act like Toilet sales isn't a pretty good gig. Especially with the Holiday season coming up.
So what do you call my two gal friends who both grew up going to Husky games with their Dad's (all 4 of them), didn't qual for UW (too hot and dumb for that mess), graduated WSU, and are now back wearing the chrome purple and tan on Saturday's?
My sister hates herself and is a jack cuog just to add more family drama to the thanksgiving holiday. Talk shit all week, lose, act like nothing happened. LRR.
How anyone could be a jack husky without some serious ties is beyond me, I tried to quit on UW football for 10 years 2003-13. If you have a problem with jack ____ fans never visit Texas or the south.
Fifth year for the double major. 3 moar at Condon Hall for the pretend law degree. Yeah you're probably right.
Don't tell faggot bob about this thread. He'll freak out that I brought it up.
plz tell me u got the law degree outside of WA?
Nope. UW. Almost went to Penn. in hindsight should have. The debt scared me off.
is UW's law school any good? is it even respected?
Yes, it's pretty solid. Not where the medical school or comp sci programs are, but like around where Foster would be. That is, it's a school that typically shows up in the lower top 25 or top 30. It's harder to get into than most of its peers in that zone of the top 50, and has been for years. When I was there, most of us in my class of about 155 (it's one of the smaller national law schools) had offers from top-tier schools and stayed to save money. In my era, you needed to be north of a 3.6 or so undergrad, and where you went to undergrad mattered. We had tons of people from New England LACs like Williams and Amherst, and we had tons of people from the UC system, representing. Very, very few directional state school kids.
Where UW was tuff was on the test score side. The LSAT has always been a big deal in law school admissions, but UW was known as a "test-heavy" school, meaning if you weren't in the range on the LSAT, there was little you could have done as an undergrad to make up for it and you would not get in. In my era, you needed to be in that 42 out of 48 on the lsat, which put you in the low 90th to 92nd percentile. If you wanted to be assured of getting in, you needed to really hammer it with a 43 or 44, which is not easy. Every point over 39 on the old test put you in increasingly rare company.
On the whole, UW law was and is known well for its Asian Law program and library collection. It's also a solid place to study Indian law (hi @Swaye ), which is incredibly complex.
But, like UW itself, it lacks the national name for prestige and it doesn't translate well to the big money centers, where the competition is keen. It does well in Seattle because it's in Seattle. But if you want to work in Chicago, LA, SF, Boston, NY, etc. etc. at a top-tier firm, you want top 5. It's roughly the equivalent of getting your law degree at Boston College, Boston U, Wisconsin, UNC, UC Hastings, etc. etc.
Tippy top is Yale, Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, Michigan (yep, their law school is very elite), Boalt (Berkeley), Chicago and maybe Duke.
There is another tier between tippy top and Washington's group that is too long to list here, but it's like Cornell, Penn, UVa, Georgetown, UCLA, Texas, USC, etc.
Fifth year for the double major. 3 moar at Condon Hall for the pretend law degree. Yeah you're probably right.
Don't tell faggot bob about this thread. He'll freak out that I brought it up.
plz tell me u got the law degree outside of WA?
Nope. UW. Almost went to Penn. in hindsight should have. The debt scared me off.
is UW's law school any good? is it even respected?
Yes, it's pretty solid. Not where the medical school or comp sci programs are, but like around where Foster would be. That is, it's a school that typically shows up in the lower top 25 or top 30. It's harder to get into than most of its peers in that zone of the top 50, and has been for years. When I was there, most of us in my class of about 155 (it's one of the smaller national law schools) had offers from top-tier schools and stayed to save money. In my era, you needed to be north of a 3.6 or so undergrad, and where you went to undergrad mattered. We had tons of people from New England LACs like Williams and Amherst, and we had tons of people from the UC system, representing. Very, very few directional state school kids.
Where UW was tuff was on the test score side. The LSAT has always been a big deal in law school admissions, but UW was known as a "test-heavy" school, meaning if you weren't in the range on the LSAT, there was little you could have done as an undergrad to make up for it and you would not get in. In my era, you needed to be in that 42 out of 48 on the lsat, which put you in the low 90th to 92nd percentile. If you wanted to be assured of getting in, you needed to really hammer it with a 43 or 44, which is not easy. Every point over 39 on the old test put you in increasingly rare company.
On the whole, UW law was and is known well for its Asian Law program and library collection. It's also a solid place to study Indian law (hi @Swaye ), which is incredibly complex.
But, like UW itself, it lacks the national name for prestige and it doesn't translate well to the big money centers, where the competition is keen. It does well in Seattle because it's in Seattle. But if you want to work in Chicago, LA, SF, Boston, NY, etc. etc. at a top-tier firm, you want top 5. It's roughly the equivalent of getting your law degree at Boston College, Boston U, Wisconsin, UNC, UC Hastings, etc. etc.
Tippy top is Yale, Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, Michigan (yep, their law school is very elite), Boalt (Berkeley), Chicago and maybe Duke.
There is another tier between tippy top and Washington's group that is too long to list here, but it's like Cornell, Penn, UVa, Georgetown, UCLA, Texas, USC, etc.
Fifth year for the double major. 3 moar at Condon Hall for the pretend law degree. Yeah you're probably right.
Don't tell faggot bob about this thread. He'll freak out that I brought it up.
plz tell me u got the law degree outside of WA?
Nope. UW. Almost went to Penn. in hindsight should have. The debt scared me off.
is UW's law school any good? is it even respected?
Yes, it's pretty solid. Not where the medical school or comp sci programs are, but like around where Foster would be. That is, it's a school that typically shows up in the lower top 25 or top 30. It's harder to get into than most of its peers in that zone of the top 50, and has been for years. When I was there, most of us in my class of about 155 (it's one of the smaller national law schools) had offers from top-tier schools and stayed to save money. In my era, you needed to be north of a 3.6 or so undergrad, and where you went to undergrad mattered. We had tons of people from New England LACs like Williams and Amherst, and we had tons of people from the UC system, representing. Very, very few directional state school kids.
Where UW was tuff was on the test score side. The LSAT has always been a big deal in law school admissions, but UW was known as a "test-heavy" school, meaning if you weren't in the range on the LSAT, there was little you could have done as an undergrad to make up for it and you would not get in. In my era, you needed to be in that 42 out of 48 on the lsat, which put you in the low 90th to 92nd percentile. If you wanted to be assured of getting in, you needed to really hammer it with a 43 or 44, which is not easy. Every point over 39 on the old test put you in increasingly rare company.
On the whole, UW law was and is known well for its Asian Law program and library collection. It's also a solid place to study Indian law (hi @Swaye ), which is incredibly complex.
But, like UW itself, it lacks the national name for prestige and it doesn't translate well to the big money centers, where the competition is keen. It does well in Seattle because it's in Seattle. But if you want to work in Chicago, LA, SF, Boston, NY, etc. etc. at a top-tier firm, you want top 5. It's roughly the equivalent of getting your law degree at Boston College, Boston U, Wisconsin, UNC, UC Hastings, etc. etc.
Tippy top is Yale, Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, Michigan (yep, their law school is very elite), Boalt (Berkeley), Chicago and maybe Duke.
There is another tier between tippy top and Washington's group that is too long to list here, but it's like Cornell, Penn, UVa, Georgetown, UCLA, Texas, USC, etc.
I love the coogs who get their cunts sandy that there are uw fans who didn’t go to UW #remorastrong. And fuck off.
There's gotta be a lot of resentment there. Being a coog means you're sentenced for life to follow the team. It means relying on a tradition of rallying gimmicks rather than wins. It's like a religion, a cult. When you are scared and weak, you make happy shit up to fill the void, keep you calm. I don't blame them, it's gotta be really hard.
Comments
Where UW was tuff was on the test score side. The LSAT has always been a big deal in law school admissions, but UW was known as a "test-heavy" school, meaning if you weren't in the range on the LSAT, there was little you could have done as an undergrad to make up for it and you would not get in. In my era, you needed to be in that 42 out of 48 on the lsat, which put you in the low 90th to 92nd percentile. If you wanted to be assured of getting in, you needed to really hammer it with a 43 or 44, which is not easy. Every point over 39 on the old test put you in increasingly rare company.
On the whole, UW law was and is known well for its Asian Law program and library collection. It's also a solid place to study Indian law (hi @Swaye ), which is incredibly complex.
But, like UW itself, it lacks the national name for prestige and it doesn't translate well to the big money centers, where the competition is keen. It does well in Seattle because it's in Seattle. But if you want to work in Chicago, LA, SF, Boston, NY, etc. etc. at a top-tier firm, you want top 5. It's roughly the equivalent of getting your law degree at Boston College, Boston U, Wisconsin, UNC, UC Hastings, etc. etc.
Tippy top is Yale, Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, Michigan (yep, their law school is very elite), Boalt (Berkeley), Chicago and maybe Duke.
There is another tier between tippy top and Washington's group that is too long to list here, but it's like Cornell, Penn, UVa, Georgetown, UCLA, Texas, USC, etc.