Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Mobs not jobs

1235789

Comments

  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    But but but Obama!!!!! Obama did it!!!!!




    Pussy

    Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
    Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.

    I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.

    It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.

    HtH
    The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
    Ok.

    So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?

    And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
    This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.

    As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    But but but Obama!!!!! Obama did it!!!!!




    Pussy

    Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
    Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.

    I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.

    It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.

    HtH
    The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
    Ok.

    So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?

    And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
    This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.

    As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
    The media room gets a big belly laugh at mention of Benghazi. Oh really.... What do you want people to be held accountable for? You do realize that has been investigated more than 9/11 was investigated. Right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,695 Founders Club
    And you don't realize the results of the investigation obviously

    Just because she walked doesn't mean there was nothing there

    Back then democrats didn't want special prosecutors and hacks like Holder and Lynch helped cover up malfeasance

    Good times
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    But but but Obama!!!!! Obama did it!!!!!




    Pussy

    Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
    Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.

    I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.

    It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.

    HtH
    The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
    Ok.

    So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?

    And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
    This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.

    As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
    The media room gets a big belly laugh at mention of Benghazi. Oh really.... What do you want people to be held accountable for? You do realize that has been investigated more than 9/11 was investigated. Right?
    Unlike you, I don’t care what the media thinks. What do they need to be held accountable for? The denying of sufficient security despite repeated requests from Ambassador Stevens in the weeks leading up to the attacks; the lack of response when the attacks began; ordering the Africom team to stand down. There’s a lot to be investigated.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    But but but Obama!!!!! Obama did it!!!!!




    Pussy

    Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
    Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.

    I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.

    It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.

    HtH
    The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
    Ok.

    So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?

    And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
    This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.

    As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
    The media room gets a big belly laugh at mention of Benghazi. Oh really.... What do you want people to be held accountable for? You do realize that has been investigated more than 9/11 was investigated. Right?
    Unlike you, I don’t care what the media thinks. What do they need to be held accountable for? The denying of sufficient security despite repeated requests from Ambassador Stevens in the weeks leading up to the attacks; the lack of response when the attacks began; ordering the Africom team to stand down. There’s a lot to be investigated.
    That's all been investigated and reported on. Read the report. I have. It's on the internet and easy to find. Tho I know your news source likes to keep stoking those flames.

    Stand down order. Haha you sound like a fox news ad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    In case your Google is broken.

    https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,686
    Words = violence
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,304
    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    But but but Obama!!!!! Obama did it!!!!!




    Pussy

    Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
    Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.

    I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.

    It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.

    HtH
    The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
    Ok.

    So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?

    And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
    This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.

    As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
    I can respect that. But didn't Gowdy investigate the mother loving shit out of her and it for what seemed like a decade? Everybody thinks he's so great ... what did he come away with? I honestly stopped watching it because I had the sense that I'd personally never want to be second-guessed for how I handled shit in that part of the word, where shit does and will happen. 83 Beirut, USS Cole, Iran Hostages ... there is always some notion that somebody could have known or done something different. Maybe somebody went down for all those things and more. What's your take on that? Is there a sincere belief among non-hacks that she JDNGAF? Or was over head? What's the theory of liability there?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    creepycoug said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    But but but Obama!!!!! Obama did it!!!!!




    Pussy

    Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
    Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.

    I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.

    It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.

    HtH
    The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
    Ok.

    So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?

    And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
    This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.

    As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
    The media room gets a big belly laugh at mention of Benghazi. Oh really.... What do you want people to be held accountable for? You do realize that has been investigated more than 9/11 was investigated. Right?
    Unlike you, I don’t care what the media thinks. What do they need to be held accountable for? The denying of sufficient security despite repeated requests from Ambassador Stevens in the weeks leading up to the attacks; the lack of response when the attacks began; ordering the Africom team to stand down. There’s a lot to be investigated.
    That's all been investigated and reported on. Read the report. I have. It's on the internet and easy to find. Tho I know your news source likes to keep stoking those flames.

    Stand down order. Haha you sound like a fox news ad.
    Stand down order is a common military term, and it’s referenced on the first page of your link. Try and keep up.

    Did that investigation include access to the 33,000 missing emails? The ones that were discovered during the course of the investigation? I’ll make it easy for you, the answer is No. I’ll posit that there’s more evidence that Hillary screwed up Benghazi than Kavanaugh molested Ford. Yet, you defend one and not the other.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,695 Founders Club
    Gowdy wasn't law enforcement. AS hondo would say "your news source" just told you how brave Hillary was as she sat there and lied and said what differences does it make?

    Gowdy revealed the fuck up and the big lie by Obama and Hillary. He can't make you give a shit like you would if it were the GOP

    Dude got sodomized, killed and dragged through the streets.

    Because of a video in Cali
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter