Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.
I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.
It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.
HtH
The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
Ok.
So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?
And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.
As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.
I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.
It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.
HtH
The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
Ok.
So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?
And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.
As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
The media room gets a big belly laugh at mention of Benghazi. Oh really.... What do you want people to be held accountable for? You do realize that has been investigated more than 9/11 was investigated. Right?
Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.
I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.
It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.
HtH
The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
Ok.
So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?
And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.
As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
The media room gets a big belly laugh at mention of Benghazi. Oh really.... What do you want people to be held accountable for? You do realize that has been investigated more than 9/11 was investigated. Right?
Unlike you, I don’t care what the media thinks. What do they need to be held accountable for? The denying of sufficient security despite repeated requests from Ambassador Stevens in the weeks leading up to the attacks; the lack of response when the attacks began; ordering the Africom team to stand down. There’s a lot to be investigated.
Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.
I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.
It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.
HtH
The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
Ok.
So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?
And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.
As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
The media room gets a big belly laugh at mention of Benghazi. Oh really.... What do you want people to be held accountable for? You do realize that has been investigated more than 9/11 was investigated. Right?
Unlike you, I don’t care what the media thinks. What do they need to be held accountable for? The denying of sufficient security despite repeated requests from Ambassador Stevens in the weeks leading up to the attacks; the lack of response when the attacks began; ordering the Africom team to stand down. There’s a lot to be investigated.
That's all been investigated and reported on. Read the report. I have. It's on the internet and easy to find. Tho I know your news source likes to keep stoking those flames.
Stand down order. Haha you sound like a fox news ad.
Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.
I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.
It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.
HtH
The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
Ok.
So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?
And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.
As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
I can respect that. But didn't Gowdy investigate the mother loving shit out of her and it for what seemed like a decade? Everybody thinks he's so great ... what did he come away with? I honestly stopped watching it because I had the sense that I'd personally never want to be second-guessed for how I handled shit in that part of the word, where shit does and will happen. 83 Beirut, USS Cole, Iran Hostages ... there is always some notion that somebody could have known or done something different. Maybe somebody went down for all those things and more. What's your take on that? Is there a sincere belief among non-hacks that she JDNGAF? Or was over head? What's the theory of liability there?
Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.
I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.
It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.
HtH
The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
Ok.
So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?
And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.
As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
The media room gets a big belly laugh at mention of Benghazi. Oh really.... What do you want people to be held accountable for? You do realize that has been investigated more than 9/11 was investigated. Right?
Unlike you, I don’t care what the media thinks. What do they need to be held accountable for? The denying of sufficient security despite repeated requests from Ambassador Stevens in the weeks leading up to the attacks; the lack of response when the attacks began; ordering the Africom team to stand down. There’s a lot to be investigated.
That's all been investigated and reported on. Read the report. I have. It's on the internet and easy to find. Tho I know your news source likes to keep stoking those flames.
Stand down order. Haha you sound like a fox news ad.
Stand down order is a common military term, and it’s referenced on the first page of your link. Try and keep up.
Did that investigation include access to the 33,000 missing emails? The ones that were discovered during the course of the investigation? I’ll make it easy for you, the answer is No. I’ll posit that there’s more evidence that Hillary screwed up Benghazi than Kavanaugh molested Ford. Yet, you defend one and not the other.
Gowdy wasn't law enforcement. AS hondo would say "your news source" just told you how brave Hillary was as she sat there and lied and said what differences does it make?
Gowdy revealed the fuck up and the big lie by Obama and Hillary. He can't make you give a shit like you would if it were the GOP
Dude got sodomized, killed and dragged through the streets.
And you don't realize the results of the investigation obviously
Just because she walked doesn't mean there was nothing there
Back then democrats didn't want special prosecutors and hacks like Holder and Lynch helped cover up malfeasance
Good times
Without the Benghazi investigation we would have never found out about Hillary's illegal email server and all the bullshit that surrounded her use of it.
Gowdy wasn't law enforcement. AS hondo would say "your news source" just told you how brave Hillary was as she sat there and lied and said what differences does it make?
Gowdy revealed the fuck up and the big lie by Obama and Hillary. He can't make you give a shit like you would if it were the GOP
Dude got sodomized, killed and dragged through the streets.
Because of a video in Cali
I didn't think she was brave and IDGAF whether it was a GOP SOS or otherwise.
People got shot up in Cali last night; I'm not running out in the streets screaming for gun control. If you want to get emotional about Stevens, go ahead. I'm sure it's not at all informed by politics.
Are you still playing this card? Comparing current politicians/administrations to their past counterparts is a valid method of discernment. Ridiculing that process rings of desperation on your part. Deep down you know there are double standards in play.
Um, not exactly. It's rhetoric, either way.
I grew very impatient with the Obama administration's thinly-veiled references to the "mess they inherited" from Bush.
It's bullshit. You're in the game now. Winners win. At least that's what they tell me in the Tug.
HtH
The point I’m making isnt about the rhetoric coming from the politicians but the rhetoric that comes from the people who provide cover for those politicians. Pointing out their hypocrisy is the quickest way to invalidate/weaken their argument. Hondo can’t justify the hypocrisy on his side so he ridicules any mention of Obama or Hillary as if that’s somehow a reach.
Ok.
So, Hondo is a clockwork shill. Got it. I think I knew that though. Btw, see any more of those around here? Or is it just the lefties that grab your attention?
And, frankly, Hillary is a reach. She never held the office. When you criticize a company, you criticize the president and ceo, not the SVP of HR.
This portion of this conversation was specifically aimed at Hondo; if you thought I was inferring it was something greater than that then that’s a communication issue. Do you need to hear me say both sides do it? Yes, both sides have their share of hypocrites and party shills.
As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
I can respect that. But didn't Gowdy investigate the mother loving shit out of her and it for what seemed like a decade? Everybody thinks he's so great ... what did he come away with? I honestly stopped watching it because I had the sense that I'd personally never want to be second-guessed for how I handled shit in that part of the word, where shit does and will happen. 83 Beirut, USS Cole, Iran Hostages ... there is always some notion that somebody could have known or done something different. Maybe somebody went down for all those things and more. What's your take on that? Is there a sincere belief among non-hacks that she JDNGAF? Or was over head? What's the theory of liability there?
He came away with her use of an illegal private email server to conduct her official business. He came away with obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence and perjury and her transmitting classified materials using an unsecured server. He also came away with the corruption at both the FBI and the DOJ and the intentional changing of the language of the what Hillary had engaged in order to protect her from prosecution. The corruption and sleaze that surrounds that entire investigation, from the immunity given to Hillary's closest aides for no fucking reason, to the destruction of subpoenaed materials should have led to people doing serious jail time. You compare how aggressively they pursued Gen. Flynn with the way Hillary and her cabal were treated and you know that the fix was in.
I care about the projection and perception of American power Fair
When it happened this bored was filled with but Reagan and Lebanon. I cared about that too Fair
I care when Obama and Hillary go to Pakistan to apologize about a fake video as the cause. Opinions will always vary about what to do with what is the very definition of an intractable issue ... that being the effort to forget diplomacy in the Middle East. I sure don't have the answer, but I like it better when things are quiet over there, and it seems that more we talk tuff and punch, the more they talk tuff and punch back, which is fine. But they have nothing to lose, which makes them a difficult counterparty with which to negotiate/deal/fight
Seems like a lot of folks here care a LOT about Trump lies that are far less damaging to the country Sure.
But I'm partisan and all of you are just interested non partisan observers Also true
Looney Tunes had it right. Fight like hell during the day. Punch the clock at 5.
This mob shit harassing people at their homes, in restaurants, walking down the street. Fucking bullshit. To argue otherwise is the highest level of fucktardery in a civilized society.
There's already enough fucking nutcase motherfuckers on both sides of the aisle. No sane person would enter into public service if having pitchforks and torches on the sidewalk becomes the norm. Just stop.
Looney Tunes had it right. Fight like hell during the day. Punch the clock at 5.
This mob shit harassing people at their homes, in restaurants, walking down the street. Fucking bullshit. To argue otherwise is the highest level of fucktardery in a civilized society.
There's already enough fucking nutcase motherfuckers on both sides of the aisle. No sane person would enter into public service if having pitchforks and torches on the sidewalk becomes the norm. Just stop.
Looney Tunes had it right. Fight like hell during the day. Punch the clock at 5.
This mob shit harassing people at their homes, in restaurants, walking down the street. Fucking bullshit. To argue otherwise is the highest level of fucktardery in a civilized society.
There's already enough fucking nutcase motherfuckers on both sides of the aisle. No sane person would enter into public service if having pitchforks and torches on the sidewalk becomes the norm. Just stop.
Creppy is performing a public service today by being available for a harsh workout so I don't tell actual real customers to go fuck themselves. Its that kind of day at my home office doing the work no illegal could do
Looney Tunes had it right. Fight like hell during the day. Punch the clock at 5.
This mob shit harassing people at their homes, in restaurants, walking down the street. Fucking bullshit. To argue otherwise is the highest level of fucktardery in a civilized society.
There's already enough fucking nutcase motherfuckers on both sides of the aisle. No sane person would enter into public service if having pitchforks and torches on the sidewalk becomes the norm. Just stop.
Right. They aren't reduced to sending pipe bombs to people in the media.
Comments
As to Hillary, you’ll find very few posts about her from me. I’m resigned to the fact that Hillary will get away with the server and email scandal but I’d still like to see her held accountable for Benghazi. I tend to avoid those discussions as it’s simply tilting at windmills at this point. Nevertheless, when someone else talks about her, I can guarantee Hondo will be there with his ‘...but, but...Hillary. el oh el’ shtick.
Just because she walked doesn't mean there was nothing there
Back then democrats didn't want special prosecutors and hacks like Holder and Lynch helped cover up malfeasance
Good times
Stand down order. Haha you sound like a fox news ad.
https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi report.pdf
Did that investigation include access to the 33,000 missing emails? The ones that were discovered during the course of the investigation? I’ll make it easy for you, the answer is No. I’ll posit that there’s more evidence that Hillary screwed up Benghazi than Kavanaugh molested Ford. Yet, you defend one and not the other.
Gowdy revealed the fuck up and the big lie by Obama and Hillary. He can't make you give a shit like you would if it were the GOP
Dude got sodomized, killed and dragged through the streets.
Because of a video in Cali
People got shot up in Cali last night; I'm not running out in the streets screaming for gun control. If you want to get emotional about Stevens, go ahead. I'm sure it's not at all informed by politics.
When it happened this bored was filled with but Reagan and Lebanon. I cared about that too
I care when Obama and Hillary go to Pakistan to apologize about a fake video as the cause.
Seems like a lot of folks here care a LOT about Trump lies that are far less damaging to the country
But I'm partisan and all of you are just interested non partisan observers
Looney Tunes had it right. Fight like hell during the day. Punch the clock at 5.
This mob shit harassing people at their homes, in restaurants, walking down the street. Fucking bullshit. To argue otherwise is the highest level of fucktardery in a civilized society.
There's already enough fucking nutcase motherfuckers on both sides of the aisle. No sane person would enter into public service if having pitchforks and torches on the sidewalk becomes the norm. Just stop.