Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Any of you libs care to take a stab at tell us why Trump's Ad is racist?
Comments
-
Maybe it is. Like I said, the racist portion is the most vocal and the most passionate so that may skew the perception.RaceBannon said:
I think that's way to high. I think it's what the DNC would like people to believeHillsboroDuck said:
There's far more racists in Trump's base than CNN's. CNN's base has people with plenty of other issues.SFGbob said:
I'm taking in every word you're saying. I'm interested. Trump puts out this Ad to appeal to his racist base. A certain percentage of the people opposed to illegal immigration are racist but you can't say what that percentage might be. CNN plays this Ad to appeal to their base, who I assume is not racist. Yes, you didn't say this but you're big on inferences so I just inferred that. If I'm wrong and you believe that both CNN and Trump's bases are filled with racists I apologize.HillsboroDuck said:
I've answered like ten of your questions in this thread and all you do is ask another stupider one. It's clear you're not interested in what I have to say. I'll take my cue to stop answering.SFGbob said:
Of course you're just giving me your opinion, that's fine, we don't have to agree. But you have no idea what the percentage of people who oppose illegal immigration that are racists. Any people who support illegal immigration that might be racist? Do these people really "fear" immigration or are they just opposed to illegal immigration?HillsboroDuck said:
I already gave you a graph of my take on this. There's obviously no way to objectively measure it so you can agree or disagree with my opinion all you want, I'm fine with it.SFGbob said:
But why would he need that Ad? Wouldn't opposing illegal immigration be enough of a motivation for these "racists?" Any idea what percentage of the people who oppose illegal immigration are racists?HillsboroDuck said:Trump isn't trying to win anybody's votes here, he's just trying to ensure the votes that are already in his corner show up at the poles. It's motivation, not debate.
This is why I said the caravan is a huge boon for the GOP. The timing is perfect. I seriously "lol" at all the idiots on my feed who think Soros is financing this thing. It's way more beneficial timing for the right than the left.
As for your first question, I'll try and explain it one more. The racists are motivated. The video is a tool for them to share with their less/non racist frens who also fear immigration to motivate them to vote also.
I gave you a graph, if you want a number I'd say at least 1/3 of the people opposed to illegal immigration are in some percentage opposed because of their racial biases. Perhaps more.
My impression is the DNC wants us to believe it's a lot higher than that, but I could be wrong. -
Both administrations let him in and both kicked him out, so while that's true its also chintentionally skewed, just as the ad is.Passion said:
By the way, the Clinton Administration kicked out the illegal immigrant featured in the ad, and the Bush administration let him back in. Just clearing up another trump lie. -
JFC I used to think you were trolling but now I've realized you really are as dense and stupid as you come across. The ad intersperses shots of Bracamontes with footage of the migrant caravan and other images of immigrants. It doesn't take a genius to infer what the message they are trying to convey. If you have a hard time connecting the dots there then I doubt you have the intellectual capacity to follow the plot of a Simpsons episode.
As @Passion accurately stated, the reason you are having trouble understanding why the ad is racist is because you're a racist in denial. Just man up and fucking own it you racist Kunt. -
Pleasant discussing this with you sir.HillsboroDuck said:
Maybe it is. Like I said, the racist portion is the most vocal and the most passionate so that may skew the perception.RaceBannon said:
I think that's way to high. I think it's what the DNC would like people to believeHillsboroDuck said:
There's far more racists in Trump's base than CNN's. CNN's base has people with plenty of other issues.SFGbob said:
I'm taking in every word you're saying. I'm interested. Trump puts out this Ad to appeal to his racist base. A certain percentage of the people opposed to illegal immigration are racist but you can't say what that percentage might be. CNN plays this Ad to appeal to their base, who I assume is not racist. Yes, you didn't say this but you're big on inferences so I just inferred that. If I'm wrong and you believe that both CNN and Trump's bases are filled with racists I apologize.HillsboroDuck said:
I've answered like ten of your questions in this thread and all you do is ask another stupider one. It's clear you're not interested in what I have to say. I'll take my cue to stop answering.SFGbob said:
Of course you're just giving me your opinion, that's fine, we don't have to agree. But you have no idea what the percentage of people who oppose illegal immigration that are racists. Any people who support illegal immigration that might be racist? Do these people really "fear" immigration or are they just opposed to illegal immigration?HillsboroDuck said:
I already gave you a graph of my take on this. There's obviously no way to objectively measure it so you can agree or disagree with my opinion all you want, I'm fine with it.SFGbob said:
But why would he need that Ad? Wouldn't opposing illegal immigration be enough of a motivation for these "racists?" Any idea what percentage of the people who oppose illegal immigration are racists?HillsboroDuck said:Trump isn't trying to win anybody's votes here, he's just trying to ensure the votes that are already in his corner show up at the poles. It's motivation, not debate.
This is why I said the caravan is a huge boon for the GOP. The timing is perfect. I seriously "lol" at all the idiots on my feed who think Soros is financing this thing. It's way more beneficial timing for the right than the left.
As for your first question, I'll try and explain it one more. The racists are motivated. The video is a tool for them to share with their less/non racist frens who also fear immigration to motivate them to vote also.
I gave you a graph, if you want a number I'd say at least 1/3 of the people opposed to illegal immigration are in some percentage opposed because of their racial biases. Perhaps more.
My impression is the DNC wants us to believe it's a lot higher than that, but I could be wrong. -
Previously I wasted my time going to great lengths to explain why it was racist for trump to say the federal judge of Mexican heritage could not be a neutral arbiter in a case involving trump because trump wants to build a wall. Saying that somebody cannot be fair because of their race is patently racist. But of course, none of trump's racist supporters agreed.
You never wasted your time explaining that to me, because I'm not arguing that Trump's comment about the Mexican Judge wasn't racist, although I would probably call it bigoted more than I'd call it racist. Why would you bring up something that I've never said and don't believe? -
Again with the "fear and hatred of immigrants" bullshit. There's no fear or hatred of immigrants. There is disgust with illegal immigration and the damage unchecked illegal immigration has done to many communities.
-
I think the racists are the people who keep saying that ad was racist. I don't associate illegal immigrant cop killers with all Hispanics or with all immigrants but obviously some of you fucks do.
I see an Ad that displays an illegal immigrant who killed a cop. Rats love the illegal immigrant. So they need to own the fact that some of the illegals they love and want to protect are going to end up doing some bad shit. Be honest with the American people that's just the price we have to pay in order to allow this undocumented Democrats into our country.
There is no mention of race in that Ad. -
For a baboon simpleton who's faithfully following his given instructions, like you, sure.SFGbob said:Takes a hell of lot of inferences to come to those conclusions.
-
Great post. Wasted on Bob, who's a giant dumb fuck, but the rest of us appreciated it.HillsboroDuck said:Ummmm, because it uses footage of an illegal immigrant from Mexico who committed atrocities to suggest that those who are trying to come here from Honduras are coming here to do the same thing, when the main thing they have in common is the color of their skin? He's not Honduran, he didn't come in a Caravan, but his actions predict theirs because skin color.
It's the clear implication of the ad.
I agree completely with your second paragraph but that doesn't mean they are never right in their claims. They're right about this one, it's pretty obvious.
The migrant caravan is a huge boon for the GOP heading into the election and Trump is smart to take advantage of that. It could have been done a lot more subtly though. -
From the faggot who uses "strawman"' whenever he doesn't know what else to say.SFGbob said:
And none of CNN's base is racist, only Trump's base is racist. I'm starting to get it now.HillsboroDuck said:
CNN's trying to use it to fire up their base as well.SFGbob said:
But the Ad is getting massive play on CNN, are they racists?HillsboroDuck said:
"Trump knows when appealing to them they'll do what needs to be done to fire up the non racist portion of the diagram."SFGbob said:I do think he knows he's appealing to racists and does it chintentionally.
Why wouldn't just simply opposing illegal immigration appeal to these racists? Why would you need a "racist" Ad?
He put the video out for the racists to share with their anti illegal immigration, non/less racist frens.
There's definitely a brilliance to Trump.
Also clicks.
hth
He explained it to you 20 fucking times and ways, so you changed the subject.
What a useless whore your mom must've been. -
Trump and Republicans can do no wrong.creepycoug said:
From the faggot who uses "strawman"' whenever he doesn't know what else to say.SFGbob said:
And none of CNN's base is racist, only Trump's base is racist. I'm starting to get it now.HillsboroDuck said:
CNN's trying to use it to fire up their base as well.SFGbob said:
But the Ad is getting massive play on CNN, are they racists?HillsboroDuck said:
"Trump knows when appealing to them they'll do what needs to be done to fire up the non racist portion of the diagram."SFGbob said:I do think he knows he's appealing to racists and does it chintentionally.
Why wouldn't just simply opposing illegal immigration appeal to these racists? Why would you need a "racist" Ad?
He put the video out for the racists to share with their anti illegal immigration, non/less racist frens.
There's definitely a brilliance to Trump.
Also clicks.
hth
He explained it to you 20 fucking times and ways, so you changed the subject.
What a useless whore your mom must've been. -
The state of Oregon should be sued. This death is why you can't do this shit. #deportthemall
illegal-immigrant-ice-wanted-deported-is-now-charged-in-wifes-stabbing-death
-
Trump is mean and white so therefore, racist.
Anything a racist says is a racist statement regardless of whether or not it has anything to do with race.
Pretty clear. -
Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist
It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host -
-
MariotaTheGawd said:
Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist
It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful racist jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host -
I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.MariotaTheGawd said:Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist
It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host
You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers. -
Hondo's reduced to tonguing other lib's asswholes because he is too big a coward and too stupid to admit he put his head up his ass and lied in a number of other threads.2001400ex said:
Trump and Republicans can do no wrong.creepycoug said:
From the faggot who uses "strawman"' whenever he doesn't know what else to say.SFGbob said:
And none of CNN's base is racist, only Trump's base is racist. I'm starting to get it now.HillsboroDuck said:
CNN's trying to use it to fire up their base as well.SFGbob said:
But the Ad is getting massive play on CNN, are they racists?HillsboroDuck said:
"Trump knows when appealing to them they'll do what needs to be done to fire up the non racist portion of the diagram."SFGbob said:I do think he knows he's appealing to racists and does it chintentionally.
Why wouldn't just simply opposing illegal immigration appeal to these racists? Why would you need a "racist" Ad?
He put the video out for the racists to share with their anti illegal immigration, non/less racist frens.
There's definitely a brilliance to Trump.
Also clicks.
hth
He explained it to you 20 fucking times and ways, so you changed the subject.
What a useless whore your mom must've been.
-
There's far more racists in Trump's base than CNN's. CNN's base has people with plenty of other issues.
Again your opinion and I know you have no evidence to support that. I could easily argue that CNN's base is more racist. CNN's base is probably pro-affirmative action, actually believe that white cops have declared open season on blacks, believes "hands up don't shoot" thinks that Trump's base is racist, thinks that blacks and other minorities shouldn't be held to the same standards of behavior and performance as whites. Hell Don Lemmon just declared that white males are dangerous. After the election CNN reported on hundreds of "hate crimes" that were actually bogus and never did they correct the record. They intentionally smeared Trump and his voters for these bogus hate crimes.
-
That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.SFGbob said:
I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.MariotaTheGawd said:Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist
It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host
You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.
However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it. -
The gap between how smart Bob thinks he is and how smart he actually is is wider than the talent gap between Aaron Rodgers and Jake Browning.
Since you probably won't understand that analogy, Bob you are a fucking moron. -
The gap between the frequency in which you liberal Kunts run your fucking mouths and the infrequency in which you even address let along refute a fucking word I say is larger than you're wife's fat ass. The thing is I don't think I'm that smart, I just know I'm smarter than dumb mother fucker like you who can't even address what I've said.insinceredawg said:The gap between how smart Bob thinks he is and how smart he actually is is wider than the talent gap between Aaron Rodgers and Jake Browning.
Since you probably won't understand that analogy, Bob you are a fucking moron. -
For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.creepycoug said:
That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.SFGbob said:
I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.MariotaTheGawd said:Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist
It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host
You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.
However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it. -
None of these fags are married. To a women anyway.SFGbob said:
The gap between the frequency in which you liberal Kunts run your fucking mouths and the infrequency in which you even address let along refute a fucking word I say is larger than you're wife's fat ass. The thing is I don't think I'm that smart, I just know I'm smarter than dumb mother fucker like you who can't even address what I've said.insinceredawg said:The gap between how smart Bob thinks he is and how smart he actually is is wider than the talent gap between Aaron Rodgers and Jake Browning.
Since you probably won't understand that analogy, Bob you are a fucking moron. -
No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:SFGbob said:
For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.creepycoug said:
That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.SFGbob said:
I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.MariotaTheGawd said:Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist
It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host
You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.
However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
- Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.
- Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.
- Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.
- Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.
That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.
I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine. -
Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.creepycoug said:
No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:SFGbob said:
For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.creepycoug said:
That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.SFGbob said:
I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.MariotaTheGawd said:Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist
It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host
You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.
However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
- Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.
- Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.
- Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.
- Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.
That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.
I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.
That's what that message says to me.
You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position. -
You sound awfully racist. HTHSFGbob said:
Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.creepycoug said:
No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:SFGbob said:
For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.creepycoug said:
That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.SFGbob said:
I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.MariotaTheGawd said:Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist
It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host
You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.
However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
- Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.
- Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.
- Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.
- Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.
That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.
I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.
That's what that message says to me.
You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position. -
It isn't just white people that can be racist.RaceBannon said:You also have to realize it isn't just whites opposed to illegals
-
It's not a dog whistle. I don't know how people would react if there were a lot of illegal English or Irish or Swedish immigrants in the US and one of them killed a cop. Those aren't our facts now.SFGbob said:
Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.creepycoug said:
No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:SFGbob said:
For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.creepycoug said:
That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.SFGbob said:
I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.MariotaTheGawd said:Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist
It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host
You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.
However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
- Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.
- Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.
- Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.
- Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.
That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.
I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.
That's what that message says to me.
You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position.
I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis. At the same time you gave the guy who was the 'but for' cause of the whole thing every benefit of the doubt even though that guy had as much or more past as did the kid. And you justified all of that idiot's actions even though the guy profiled and hassled the kid for being black after dark, and was the one who gave chase and clearly escalated the entire thing.
In other words, you went out of your way to rationalize everything against the black kid, refused to concede even the most obvious points in the kid's favor, and used incendiary race-baiting language in the process.
That's why I called you a racist. I'm sure I wasn't alone in that opinion by the. time we were through.
-
True. Just one for me.Sledog said:
None of these fags are married. To a women anyway.SFGbob said:
The gap between the frequency in which you liberal Kunts run your fucking mouths and the infrequency in which you even address let along refute a fucking word I say is larger than you're wife's fat ass. The thing is I don't think I'm that smart, I just know I'm smarter than dumb mother fucker like you who can't even address what I've said.insinceredawg said:The gap between how smart Bob thinks he is and how smart he actually is is wider than the talent gap between Aaron Rodgers and Jake Browning.
Since you probably won't understand that analogy, Bob you are a fucking moron.
Illiterate moron.
