Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Any of you libs care to take a stab at tell us why Trump's Ad is racist?

1246

Comments

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,839 Standard Supporter
    Illegals are criminals. They start that way and many just keep headed down that road. The drug trade in the US is mostly populated by illegals. They're bad for our country. #deportthemall
  • RedRocketRedRocket Member Posts: 1,527
    Sledog said:

    Illegals are criminals. They start that way and many just keep headed down that road. The drug trade in the US is mostly populated by illegals. They're bad for our country. #deportthemall

    Which mall should we deport first? South Center? North Gate? Surely not Bell Square.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    edited November 2018
    I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis.

    And by "bullshit basis" you mean the facts. I said things that made your Kunt hurt and you responded like most liberals. You called me a racist.

    Trayvon was a little thug who had been in multiple fights, ripped people off, had attacked a bus driver, had been kicked out of his house, posed with guns and abused drugs. There was no "stereotype." He attacked the wrong person that night and paid with his life. Did you ever read any of his text messages? He openly bragged about wanting to be a "Gangsta." His friends had warned him that he needed to stop getting into so many fights or he was going to end up with a bullet in his chest.


    He was a funking punk and they come in all colors.

  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    Off for an iodine eye rinse
  • MariotaTheGawdMariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist

    It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host

    I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.

    You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
    That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.

    Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.

    However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
    For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.
    No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:

    - Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.

    - Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.

    - Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.

    - Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.

    That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.

    I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
    Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.

    Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.

    That's what that message says to me.

    You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position.
    It's not a dog whistle. I don't know how people would react if there were a lot of illegal English or Irish or Swedish immigrants in the US and one of them killed a cop. Those aren't our facts now.

    I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis. At the same time you gave the guy who was the 'but for' cause of the whole thing every benefit of the doubt even though that guy had as much or more past as did the kid. And you justified all of that idiot's actions even though the guy profiled and hassled the kid for being black after dark, and was the one who gave chase and clearly escalated the entire thing.

    In other words, you went out of your way to rationalize everything against the black kid, refused to concede even the most obvious points in the kid's favor, and used incendiary race-baiting language in the process.

    That's why I called you a racist. I'm sure I wasn't alone in that opinion by the. time we were through.
    Racists typically dont see themselves as racist. That dude is no different
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist

    It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host

    I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.

    You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
    That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.

    Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.

    However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
    For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.
    No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:

    - Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.

    - Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.

    - Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.

    - Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.

    That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.

    I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
    Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.

    Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.

    That's what that message says to me.

    You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position.
    It's not a dog whistle. I don't know how people would react if there were a lot of illegal English or Irish or Swedish immigrants in the US and one of them killed a cop. Those aren't our facts now.

    I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis. At the same time you gave the guy who was the 'but for' cause of the whole thing every benefit of the doubt even though that guy had as much or more past as did the kid. And you justified all of that idiot's actions even though the guy profiled and hassled the kid for being black after dark, and was the one who gave chase and clearly escalated the entire thing.

    In other words, you went out of your way to rationalize everything against the black kid, refused to concede even the most obvious points in the kid's favor, and used incendiary race-baiting language in the process.

    That's why I called you a racist. I'm sure I wasn't alone in that opinion by the. time we were through.
    Racists typically dont see themselves as racist. That dude is no different
    And liberals never make bullshit allegations of racism when they're losing arguments.

    Hell, how many times were critics of Obama labeled as racist simply for criticizing Obama. Golf, Chicago, calling Obama by his middle name, were all called racist. Hell look at fucking Hondo's claim that this image is "blatant racism."







  • MariotaTheGawdMariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist

    It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host

    I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.

    You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
    That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.

    Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.

    However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
    For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.
    No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:

    - Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.

    - Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.

    - Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.

    - Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.

    That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.

    I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
    Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.

    Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.

    That's what that message says to me.

    You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position.
    It's not a dog whistle. I don't know how people would react if there were a lot of illegal English or Irish or Swedish immigrants in the US and one of them killed a cop. Those aren't our facts now.

    I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis. At the same time you gave the guy who was the 'but for' cause of the whole thing every benefit of the doubt even though that guy had as much or more past as did the kid. And you justified all of that idiot's actions even though the guy profiled and hassled the kid for being black after dark, and was the one who gave chase and clearly escalated the entire thing.

    In other words, you went out of your way to rationalize everything against the black kid, refused to concede even the most obvious points in the kid's favor, and used incendiary race-baiting language in the process.

    That's why I called you a racist. I'm sure I wasn't alone in that opinion by the. time we were through.
    Racists typically dont see themselves as racist. That dude is no different
    And liberals never make bullshit allegations of racism when they're losing arguments.

    Hell, how many times were critics of Obama labeled as racist simply for criticizing Obama. Golf, Chicago, calling Obama by his middle name, were all called racist. Hell look at fucking Hondo's claim that this image is "blatant racism."







    What is it with you people and these terrible "memes"?
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist

    It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host

    I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.

    You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
    That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.

    Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.

    However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
    For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.
    No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:

    - Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.

    - Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.

    - Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.

    - Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.

    That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.

    I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
    Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.

    Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.

    That's what that message says to me.

    You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position.
    It's not a dog whistle. I don't know how people would react if there were a lot of illegal English or Irish or Swedish immigrants in the US and one of them killed a cop. Those aren't our facts now.

    I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis. At the same time you gave the guy who was the 'but for' cause of the whole thing every benefit of the doubt even though that guy had as much or more past as did the kid. And you justified all of that idiot's actions even though the guy profiled and hassled the kid for being black after dark, and was the one who gave chase and clearly escalated the entire thing.

    In other words, you went out of your way to rationalize everything against the black kid, refused to concede even the most obvious points in the kid's favor, and used incendiary race-baiting language in the process.

    That's why I called you a racist. I'm sure I wasn't alone in that opinion by the. time we were through.
    Racists typically dont see themselves as racist. That dude is no different
    And liberals never make bullshit allegations of racism when they're losing arguments.

    Hell, how many times were critics of Obama labeled as racist simply for criticizing Obama. Golf, Chicago, calling Obama by his middle name, were all called racist. Hell look at fucking Hondo's claim that this image is "blatant racism."







    You’re complaining about the black president playing golf when the white president you support plays more golf. Nothing racist about that.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist

    It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host

    I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.

    You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
    That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.

    Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.

    However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
    For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.
    No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:

    - Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.

    - Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.

    - Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.

    - Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.

    That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.

    I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
    Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.

    Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.

    That's what that message says to me.

    You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position.
    It's not a dog whistle. I don't know how people would react if there were a lot of illegal English or Irish or Swedish immigrants in the US and one of them killed a cop. Those aren't our facts now.

    I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis. At the same time you gave the guy who was the 'but for' cause of the whole thing every benefit of the doubt even though that guy had as much or more past as did the kid. And you justified all of that idiot's actions even though the guy profiled and hassled the kid for being black after dark, and was the one who gave chase and clearly escalated the entire thing.

    In other words, you went out of your way to rationalize everything against the black kid, refused to concede even the most obvious points in the kid's favor, and used incendiary race-baiting language in the process.

    That's why I called you a racist. I'm sure I wasn't alone in that opinion by the. time we were through.
    Racists typically dont see themselves as racist. That dude is no different
    And liberals never make bullshit allegations of racism when they're losing arguments.

    Hell, how many times were critics of Obama labeled as racist simply for criticizing Obama. Golf, Chicago, calling Obama by his middle name, were all called racist. Hell look at fucking Hondo's claim that this image is "blatant racism."







    Only racists think that image isn't racist.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist

    It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host

    I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.

    You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
    That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.

    Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.

    However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
    For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.
    No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:

    - Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.

    - Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.

    - Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.

    - Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.

    That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.

    I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
    Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.

    Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.

    That's what that message says to me.

    You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position.
    It's not a dog whistle. I don't know how people would react if there were a lot of illegal English or Irish or Swedish immigrants in the US and one of them killed a cop. Those aren't our facts now.

    I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis. At the same time you gave the guy who was the 'but for' cause of the whole thing every benefit of the doubt even though that guy had as much or more past as did the kid. And you justified all of that idiot's actions even though the guy profiled and hassled the kid for being black after dark, and was the one who gave chase and clearly escalated the entire thing.

    In other words, you went out of your way to rationalize everything against the black kid, refused to concede even the most obvious points in the kid's favor, and used incendiary race-baiting language in the process.

    That's why I called you a racist. I'm sure I wasn't alone in that opinion by the. time we were through.
    Racists typically dont see themselves as racist. That dude is no different
    And liberals never make bullshit allegations of racism when they're losing arguments.

    Hell, how many times were critics of Obama labeled as racist simply for criticizing Obama. Golf, Chicago, calling Obama by his middle name, were all called racist. Hell look at fucking Hondo's claim that this image is "blatant racism."







    Only racists think that image isn't racist.
    And only a Kunt like Hondo claims that image is racist and then runs and hides like a little bitch when asked to explain why.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist

    It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host

    I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.

    You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
    That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.

    Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.

    However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
    For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.
    No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:

    - Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.

    - Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.

    - Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.

    - Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.

    That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.

    I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
    Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.

    Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.

    That's what that message says to me.

    You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position.
    It's not a dog whistle. I don't know how people would react if there were a lot of illegal English or Irish or Swedish immigrants in the US and one of them killed a cop. Those aren't our facts now.

    I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis. At the same time you gave the guy who was the 'but for' cause of the whole thing every benefit of the doubt even though that guy had as much or more past as did the kid. And you justified all of that idiot's actions even though the guy profiled and hassled the kid for being black after dark, and was the one who gave chase and clearly escalated the entire thing.

    In other words, you went out of your way to rationalize everything against the black kid, refused to concede even the most obvious points in the kid's favor, and used incendiary race-baiting language in the process.

    That's why I called you a racist. I'm sure I wasn't alone in that opinion by the. time we were through.
    Racists typically dont see themselves as racist. That dude is no different
    And liberals never make bullshit allegations of racism when they're losing arguments.

    Hell, how many times were critics of Obama labeled as racist simply for criticizing Obama. Golf, Chicago, calling Obama by his middle name, were all called racist. Hell look at fucking Hondo's claim that this image is "blatant racism."







    Only racists think that image isn't racist.
    And only a Kunt like Hondo claims that image is racist and then runs and hides like a little bitch when asked to explain why.
    It's been explained multiple times. But you are too racist to see it.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Yeah you “explained” it by saying that if you don’t agree with you that it’s “blatantly racist” them you must be a racist.

    Pure Kunt logic. When asked to actually explain why the image is racist you did what you usually do when you can’t back up that twat of a mouth of yours, you ran and hid.


    Hey fellow libs, here’s your chance to repay Hondo for all of that sweet, sweet ass tonguing he has done for you, how is that image racist? I’m sure Hondo will dive in extra deep next time if you help
    Him out.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,839 Standard Supporter
    RedRocket said:

    Sledog said:

    Illegals are criminals. They start that way and many just keep headed down that road. The drug trade in the US is mostly populated by illegals. They're bad for our country. #deportthemall

    Which mall should we deport first? South Center? North Gate? Surely not Bell Square.
    I can separate the words with spaces if this is too difficult.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,839 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Lol this board is full of the type of people who need someone to explicitly use a racial slur before they will *reluctantly* concede something is racist

    It's fascinating to see these types in their natural habitat amongst one another, slapping each other on the back and feeding off each other's awful jokes that they've plagiarized from their favorite talk radio host

    I don't need a racial slur before I'd concede the Ad was racist. If the guy who killed the cop was a white guy and Trump was blaming it on Hispanics I'd concede that was racist but simply showing video of the person who actually did the cop killing as well as video of the illegals trying to get into the country isn't racist.

    You libs appear to be the one who are associating all immigrants with illegal cop killers.
    That's because you don't understand juxtaposition and propaganda and intent to massage perception.

    Watch a propaganda film, especially Soviet-style. They don't contain many, or any, express statements of the message they intended to convey. That's because they understood the power of image and symbolism, and their combined ability to power and shape perception.

    However, they found it didn't work on dumb fucks who need everything spoon fed to them literally and simplistically. So not surprised you don't get it.
    For the propaganda to work then you must already associate immigrants with illegal cop killers on some level.
    No. That's not how it has to work. It can work like this, for example:

    - Emilio Suarez killed a cop because he's a bad guy.

    - Show a clip of Emilio being cuffed and led off by the authorities. Zero in on his facial tattoos to make him extra disturbing to the eye.

    - Show a picture of Mike Smith, the killed cop, posing with his wife and kids during happier times. Make sure and flash either his age if he's young or his time on the force if not.

    - Show a clip of a bunch of Mexicans scaling a wall somewhere. Doesn't have to be a wall on the border. Any wall anywhere. Your target audience isn't big in details and won't know anyway.

    That's how it can work to create the very association you said has to already be there. With some decent % of the US population, this will stir anger and resentment toward Mexican people seeking to come here. Easily so among those who already don't like Mexicans or browns in general.

    I don't see racism everywhere I look. I also don't have to look hard to find it. If you don't believe it, that's fine.
    Isn't it weird how only these liberal are able to hear these dog whistles? I think people don't like illegals. And Republicans and Republican leaning voters really don't like Rats who protect and defend illegals including illegal cop killers. If white people were coming to this country illegally and killing cops I'm fairly certain Republican voters wouldn't like them either.

    Rats want to let more illegals into this country, we don't know what kind of people are being let into this country. We know in the past we've let in cop killers, now the Rats want to let in more, they could be okay, they could be cop killers. Lets stop letting in illegals. Vote Republican.

    That's what that message says to me.

    You pull the race card here all the fucking time. You called me a racist simply because I thought a black person deserved to be shot by a Hispanic person he was beating on. Hardly shocking that you "see" racism in that Ad. You're a lib, it's your default position.
    It's not a dog whistle. I don't know how people would react if there were a lot of illegal English or Irish or Swedish immigrants in the US and one of them killed a cop. Those aren't our facts now.

    I called you a racist in the other conversation because you were begging me to. You dropped every stereotype in the book in your voluminous posts, and in so doing gave the black kid absolutely zero benefit of the doubt because you scored him a thug on a bullshit basis. At the same time you gave the guy who was the 'but for' cause of the whole thing every benefit of the doubt even though that guy had as much or more past as did the kid. And you justified all of that idiot's actions even though the guy profiled and hassled the kid for being black after dark, and was the one who gave chase and clearly escalated the entire thing.

    In other words, you went out of your way to rationalize everything against the black kid, refused to concede even the most obvious points in the kid's favor, and used incendiary race-baiting language in the process.

    That's why I called you a racist. I'm sure I wasn't alone in that opinion by the. time we were through.
    Racists typically dont see themselves as racist. That dude is no different
    And liberals never make bullshit allegations of racism when they're losing arguments.

    Hell, how many times were critics of Obama labeled as racist simply for criticizing Obama. Golf, Chicago, calling Obama by his middle name, were all called racist. Hell look at fucking Hondo's claim that this image is "blatant racism."







    What is it with you people and these terrible "memes"?
    libs have no sense of humor.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,207
    SFGbob said:

    Yeah you “explained” it by saying that if you don’t agree with you that it’s “blatantly racist” them you must be a racist.

    Pure Kunt logic. When asked to actually explain why the image is racist you did what you usually do when you can’t back up that twat of a mouth of yours, you ran and hid.


    Hey fellow libs, here’s your chance to repay Hondo for all of that sweet, sweet ass tonguing he has done for you, how is that image racist? I’m sure Hondo will dive in extra deep next time if you help
    Him out.

    Are you gay?

    You reference homo eroticism more than any poster in the Tug.

    I'm starting to think this forum is a safe space for you.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Since I don’t see Hondo as a man but see him as a fucking little bitch unless you’re also copping to being a bitch that’s straight on bitch on dude ass tonguing Coug, you seem to be one of Hondo’s favorite bungholes, aren’t you going to help him out and tell us all why that image is racist?
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,207
    SFGbob said:

    Since I don’t see Hondo as a man but see him as a fucking little bitch unless you’re also copping to being a bitch that’s straight on bitch on dude ass tonguing Coug, you seem to be one of Hondo’s favorite bungholes, aren’t you going to help him out and tell us all why that image is racist?

    Strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman!!!'n
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Tell us why that image is racist Coug.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    It's awesome watching Bobby pressing about something he's been told many times. The meltdown is spectacular.
Sign In or Register to comment.