Trump's taxes on imports are now larger than taxes from the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)
Comments
-
That’s a solid effort. I had many time outs. Kim coined the 23 times saying because of me.ThomasFremont said:
I think I got the axe after the Air Force game.MikeDamone said:
Hard to be banned for criticizing Owen.ThomasFremont said:
How did you survive until 2009?MikeDamone said:ThomasFremont said:
You were a Sark believer too. We all heard the Holiday bowl pod. Thanks for the FREE PUB btw.RaceBannon said:
Don't forget better than Ty and the losers that gave him 8 yearsThomasFremont said:I’m glad we’ve confirmed that Trump is Sark. Self promoting loser that inflates results to satisfy his stupid fans.
You seem to have a habit of being easily fooled by used car salesmen types.
How long until you figure out the ruse this time?
Everyone remembers and no one forgets I bashed sark the day he was hired and coined FREE PUB! No one forgets that. I was banned from doog man in December 2009 after a season of sark bashing. Kim said we needed sizzle.ThomasFremont said:
You were a Sark believer too. We all heard the Holiday bowl pod. Thanks for the FREE PUB btw.RaceBannon said:
Don't forget better than Ty and the losers that gave him 8 yearsThomasFremont said:I’m glad we’ve confirmed that Trump is Sark. Self promoting loser that inflates results to satisfy his stupid fans.
You seem to have a habit of being easily fooled by used car salesmen types.
How long until you figure out the ruse this time? -
Why would the US remain dominant in any of those long-term? Because you were nice to people at one point?CirrhosisDawg said:SarkFanSixtyNine said:
What would successfully doing this ultimately result in?CirrhosisDawg said:T
A strong US would lead on trade and finance.SarkFanSixtyNine said:
How am I sucking Xi's dick? China is a menace to all of humanity and must be destroyed by finally responding to their trade war in kind. I don't care how many Pac12 viewers are lost.CirrhosisDawg said:
What’s it like sucking Xi’s dick? Is he making great leaps forward?SarkFanSixtyNine said:
maybe you should go suck ronald reagan's dickCirrhosisDawg said:
Tariffs do not increase government revenue. They kill trade, markets, industry and gdp.SarkFanSixtyNine said:arent you guys supposed to like higher taxes
if we must increase govt revenue a tax that incentivizes national industry seems pretty ideal to me
now that i think about it thats probably why china uses tariffs excessively as liberals fascinatingly transform into reaganomic libertarians to justify bashing orange man
china's economic success while using exorbitant tariffs and foreign barriers makes me question your beliefs
Tariffs on chinese exports?
I see this is hard for you, but how about:
Widespread wealth and prosperity (for those with the skills and education to compete), American economic dominance in the trade of high value good and services, US monopoly on innovation, enhanced national security, overwhelming international influence in economic and military affairs. Basically everything trump wants to give away because his base doesn’t understand and can’t compete.
China model:
enslave the dumb and mediocre citizens
buy up raw material sources across the globe
completely ignore all environmental concerns
completely ignore all human concerns
steal any advanced tech by implanting spies that take advantage of open western societies
subvert foreign governments by implanting spies that take advantage of open western societies
subvert foreign institutions by implanting spies that take advantage of open western societies
subvert foreign governments by blackmailing or buying politicians who will act to benefit China
use all resources gained in this manner to further your imperialistic ambitions
The proposed liberal US model:
impose ridiculous regulations on anyone hoping to do anything material
let anyone in the world into the country with no standards at all and also give them free stuff
-
Oh. I see.SarkFanSixtyNine said:
Why would the US remain dominant in any of those long-term? Because you were nice to people at one point?CirrhosisDawg said:SarkFanSixtyNine said:
What would successfully doing this ultimately result in?CirrhosisDawg said:T
A strong US would lead on trade and finance.SarkFanSixtyNine said:
How am I sucking Xi's dick? China is a menace to all of humanity and must be destroyed by finally responding to their trade war in kind. I don't care how many Pac12 viewers are lost.CirrhosisDawg said:
What’s it like sucking Xi’s dick? Is he making great leaps forward?SarkFanSixtyNine said:
maybe you should go suck ronald reagan's dickCirrhosisDawg said:
Tariffs do not increase government revenue. They kill trade, markets, industry and gdp.SarkFanSixtyNine said:arent you guys supposed to like higher taxes
if we must increase govt revenue a tax that incentivizes national industry seems pretty ideal to me
now that i think about it thats probably why china uses tariffs excessively as liberals fascinatingly transform into reaganomic libertarians to justify bashing orange man
china's economic success while using exorbitant tariffs and foreign barriers makes me question your beliefs
Tariffs on chinese exports?
I see this is hard for you, but how about:
Widespread wealth and prosperity (for those with the skills and education to compete), American economic dominance in the trade of high value good and services, US monopoly on innovation, enhanced national security, overwhelming international influence in economic and military affairs. Basically everything trump wants to give away because his base doesn’t understand and can’t compete.
China model:
enslave the dumb and mediocre citizens
buy up raw material sources across the globe
completely ignore all environmental concerns
completely ignore all human concerns
steal any advanced tech by implanting spies that take advantage of open western societies
subvert foreign governments by implanting spies that take advantage of open western societies
subvert foreign institutions by implanting spies that take advantage of open western societies
subvert foreign governments by blackmailing or buying politicians who will act to benefit China
use all resources gained in this manner to further your imperialistic ambitions
The proposed liberal US model:
impose ridiculous regulations on anyone hoping to do anything material
let anyone in the world into the country with no standards at all and also give them free stuff
MAGA is top speed for you.
Good luck! -
Why should I believe that the US could magically remain dominant in the incredibly high value spheres you listed? The US has already experienced a radical shrinking of global influence since the 70s. I laughed at England as they dwindled from rulers of practically the whole goddamn world to a shitty irrelevant muslim island. I genuinely WISH I could believe what you say, but it just doesn't make any sense.
Look at how ruthless and pragmatic China is when it comes to its own people. Obviously, they'll treat foreigners even worse if they ever become capable. Letting them do whatever the fuck they want because it means I get slightly cheaper low quality garbage for another decade is FS. I pray to G*d that this menace can be stopped. -
If you are smarter, richer and more innovative, you impose your will. That’s supposed to be the US role. China is a mere nuisance in the path towards the path of continued and constant US economic dominance (and a nice deflection for trump from Russia).SarkFanSixtyNine said:Why should I believe that the US could magically remain dominant in the incredibly high value spheres you listed? The US has already experienced a radical shrinking of global influence since the 70s. I laughed at England as they dwindled from rulers of practically the whole goddamn world to a shitty irrelevant muslim island. I genuinely WISH I could believe what you say, but it just doesn't make any sense.
Look at how ruthless and pragmatic China is when it comes to its own people. Obviously, they'll treat foreigners even worse if they ever become capable. Letting them do whatever the fuck they want because it means I get slightly cheaper low quality garbage for another decade is FS. I pray to G*d that this menace can be stopped.
China can’t compete against the US. Their only hope is American panic. Trump is stoking that outcome, and that fear.
-
CirrhosisDawg said:
T
You seem to be enamored by china’s government controlled mercantilist economic system. They’ve accumulated massive amounts of foreign currency and US debt through a corrupt economic model that keeps its people poor and takes advantage of US economic weakness (reliance on debt to fund our current consumption). Trump’s populist and protectionist economic policies feed the beast and makes the situation worse. A strong US would lead on trade and finance. Instead, we have a raving lunatic spouting nationalistic nonsense to an audience of dunces.SarkFanSixtyNine said:
How am I sucking Xi's dick? China is a menace to all of humanity and must be destroyed by finally responding to their trade war in kind. I don't care how many Pac12 viewers are lost.CirrhosisDawg said:
What’s it like sucking Xi’s dick? Is he making great leaps forward?SarkFanSixtyNine said:
maybe you should go suck ronald reagan's dickCirrhosisDawg said:
Tariffs do not increase government revenue. They kill trade, markets, industry and gdp.SarkFanSixtyNine said:arent you guys supposed to like higher taxes
if we must increase govt revenue a tax that incentivizes national industry seems pretty ideal to me
now that i think about it thats probably why china uses tariffs excessively as liberals fascinatingly transform into reaganomic libertarians to justify bashing orange man
china's economic success while using exorbitant tariffs and foreign barriers makes me question your beliefs
-
China ruling the world would suck for us.SarkFanSixtyNine said:Why should I believe that the US could magically remain dominant in the incredibly high value spheres you listed? The US has already experienced a radical shrinking of global influence since the 70s. I laughed at England as they dwindled from rulers of practically the whole goddamn world to a shitty irrelevant muslim island. I genuinely WISH I could believe what you say, but it just doesn't make any sense.
Look at how ruthless and pragmatic China is when it comes to its own people. Obviously, they'll treat foreigners even worse if they ever become capable. Letting them do whatever the fuck they want because it means I get slightly cheaper low quality garbage for another decade is FS. I pray to G*d that this menace can be stopped.
Fortunately I’m certain that will never happen.
Look man, they suck, but we are tolerant of their BS for the sake of world peace. -
But they protect and aid domestic labor and production. Ask China.CirrhosisDawg said:
Tariffs do not increase government revenue. They kill trade, markets, industry and gdp.SarkFanSixtyNine said:arent you guys supposed to like higher taxes
if we must increase govt revenue a tax that incentivizes national industry seems pretty ideal to me
now that i think about it thats probably why china uses tariffs excessively as liberals fascinatingly transform into reaganomic libertarians to justify bashing orange man
Oh no! What will we do with less cheap Walmart shit? -
Don't get Cirrho worked up, or he'll start un-closeting his dick sucking obsessions like he did here.CirrhosisDawg said:
What’s it like sucking Xi’s dick? Is he making great leaps forward?SarkFanSixtyNine said:
maybe you should go suck ronald reagan's dickCirrhosisDawg said:
Tariffs do not increase government revenue. They kill trade, markets, industry and gdp.SarkFanSixtyNine said:arent you guys supposed to like higher taxes
if we must increase govt revenue a tax that incentivizes national industry seems pretty ideal to me
now that i think about it thats probably why china uses tariffs excessively as liberals fascinatingly transform into reaganomic libertarians to justify bashing orange man
china's economic success while using exorbitant tariffs and foreign barriers makes me question your beliefs -
Why do globalism-promoting fags like yourself hate sovereignty, self-determination, democracy and freedom so much?CirrhosisDawg said:SarkFanSixtyNine said:
What would successfully doing this ultimately result in?CirrhosisDawg said:T
A strong US would lead on trade and finance.SarkFanSixtyNine said:
How am I sucking Xi's dick? China is a menace to all of humanity and must be destroyed by finally responding to their trade war in kind. I don't care how many Pac12 viewers are lost.CirrhosisDawg said:
What’s it like sucking Xi’s dick? Is he making great leaps forward?SarkFanSixtyNine said:
maybe you should go suck ronald reagan's dickCirrhosisDawg said:
Tariffs do not increase government revenue. They kill trade, markets, industry and gdp.SarkFanSixtyNine said:arent you guys supposed to like higher taxes
if we must increase govt revenue a tax that incentivizes national industry seems pretty ideal to me
now that i think about it thats probably why china uses tariffs excessively as liberals fascinatingly transform into reaganomic libertarians to justify bashing orange man
china's economic success while using exorbitant tariffs and foreign barriers makes me question your beliefs
Tariffs on chinese exports?
I see this is hard for you, but how about:
Widespread wealth and prosperity (for those with the skills and education to compete), American economic dominance in the trade of high value good and services, US monopoly on innovation, enhanced national security, overwhelming international influence in economic and military affairs. Basically everything trump wants to give away because his base doesn’t understand and can’t compete.
