Kavanaugh Nomination: Full Speed Ahead – Lunch Alert!
Comments
-
Women have a tremendous BS detector. 35 years and it goes public the week of the hearings?!?2001400ex said:
Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:Swaye said:
This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."TurdBuffer said:
The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.PurpleThrobber said:I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.
That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.
That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.
Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
"Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."
Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."
My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
Intelligent, independent women* know that kind of political bullshit devalues and disrespects women who have actual experiences of sexual harassment and assault.
* - Mrs. Throbber 9/21/18 -
You know why.PurpleThrobber said:
Women have a tremendous BS detector. 35 years and it goes public the week of the hearings?!?2001400ex said:
Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:Swaye said:
This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."TurdBuffer said:
The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.PurpleThrobber said:I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.
That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.
That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.
Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
"Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."
Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."
My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
Intelligent, independent women* know that kind of political bullshit devalues and disrespects women who have actual experiences of sexual harassment and assault.
* - Mrs. Throbber 9/21/18
@PurpleBaze
@StrongArmCobra
@oregonblitzkrieg
-
Such fag, Boobs
-
I'm not disagreeing it's a political ploy. And it's fair to bring up she gave her story to Congress in July. Which was passed on at the time.PurpleThrobber said:
Women have a tremendous BS detector. 35 years and it goes public the week of the hearings?!?2001400ex said:
Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:Swaye said:
This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."TurdBuffer said:
The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.PurpleThrobber said:I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.
That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.
That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.
Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
"Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."
Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."
My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
Intelligent, independent women* know that kind of political bullshit devalues and disrespects women who have actual experiences of sexual harassment and assault.
* - Mrs. Throbber 9/21/18
And I no doubt agree that some women agree with Miss throbber. (YKW). But what does the average independent woman voter think? If I were a republican in Congress, that's what I'd ask myself. -
That's how fucking stupid the Democrats are - hitching their wagon to a bullshit story and then trying to make it a 'fact'. It's not. It's just not.2001400ex said:
I'm not disagreeing it's a political ploy. And it's fair to bring up she gave her story to Congress in July. Which was passed on at the time.PurpleThrobber said:
Women have a tremendous BS detector. 35 years and it goes public the week of the hearings?!?2001400ex said:
Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:Swaye said:
This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."TurdBuffer said:
The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.PurpleThrobber said:I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.
That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.
That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.
Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
"Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."
Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."
My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
Intelligent, independent women* know that kind of political bullshit devalues and disrespects women who have actual experiences of sexual harassment and assault.
* - Mrs. Throbber 9/21/18
And I no doubt agree that some women agree with Miss throbber. (YKW). But what does the average independent woman voter think? If I were a republican in Congress, that's what I'd ask myself.
Focus on pay inequity between sexes, stupid ass shit that Trump says/does, whatever. But trying to take down a choir boy 35 years after the fact is idiotic. -
Throbber doesn't usually get that angry. Nice rant!!!PurpleThrobber said:
That's how fucking stupid the Democrats are - hitching their wagon to a bullshit story and then trying to make it a 'fact'. It's not. It's just not.2001400ex said:
I'm not disagreeing it's a political ploy. And it's fair to bring up she gave her story to Congress in July. Which was passed on at the time.PurpleThrobber said:
Women have a tremendous BS detector. 35 years and it goes public the week of the hearings?!?2001400ex said:
Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:Swaye said:
This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."TurdBuffer said:
The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.PurpleThrobber said:I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.
That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.
That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.
Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
"Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."
Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."
My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
Intelligent, independent women* know that kind of political bullshit devalues and disrespects women who have actual experiences of sexual harassment and assault.
* - Mrs. Throbber 9/21/18
And I no doubt agree that some women agree with Miss throbber. (YKW). But what does the average independent woman voter think? If I were a republican in Congress, that's what I'd ask myself.
Focus on pay inequity between sexes, stupid ass shit that Trump says/does, whatever. But trying to take down a choir boy 35 years after the fact is idiotic.
Read my posts....I don't think their intention is in any way to take him down..... From what I see, like I said, they are being very quiet on the matter. Letting Republicans fill the dead air. And betting that the message resonates with independent women in November. -
probably not what you deranged out of touch commies are hoping:2001400ex said:
My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
"28% of men responding to the poll think the accusation against Kavanaugh is credible. Compared to only 25% of women.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/271384/huffpo-poll-women-less-likely-men-believe-daniel-greenfield -
There's more to the story but your news source won't say it.SarkFanSixtyNine said:
probably not what you deranged out of touch commies are hoping:2001400ex said:
My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
"28% of men responding to the poll think the accusation against Kavanaugh is credible. Compared to only 25% of women.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/271384/huffpo-poll-women-less-likely-men-believe-daniel-greenfield
-
Most women and sane people think it's total bullshit.2001400ex said:
Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:Swaye said:
This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."TurdBuffer said:
The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.PurpleThrobber said:I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.
That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.
That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.
Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
"Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."
Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."
My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit? -
No. Actually they don't. There's a poll posted just right about your post. Read it.Pitchfork51 said:
Most women and sane people think it's total bullshit.2001400ex said:
Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:Swaye said:
This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."TurdBuffer said:
The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.PurpleThrobber said:I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.
That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.
That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.
Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
"Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."
Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."
My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
