Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kavanaugh Nomination: Full Speed Ahead – Lunch Alert!

1235

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    I always figured you for an independent woman.
    Your obsession makes sense now. Think about it.
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,978
    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    God you are a fucking moron.

    It is amazing at times.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    God you are a fucking moron.

    It is amazing at times.
    Agreed. Care to discuss what I said that's wrong?
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,978
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    God you are a fucking moron.

    It is amazing at times.
    Agreed. Care to discuss what I said that's wrong?
    Sure. Pay Derek first.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    God you are a fucking moron.

    It is amazing at times.
    Agreed. Care to discuss what I said that's wrong?
    Sure. Pay Derek first.

    I did in April. Didn't think you actually had a coherent response.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    God you are a fucking moron.

    It is amazing at times.
    Agreed. Care to discuss what I said that's wrong?
    Sure. Pay Derek first.

    I did in April. Didn't think you actually had a coherent response.
    You should kill yourselve. #oneless
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,978
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    God you are a fucking moron.

    It is amazing at times.
    Agreed. Care to discuss what I said that's wrong?
    Sure. Pay Derek first.

    I did in April. Didn't think you actually had a coherent response.
    @DerekJohnson true? Did our little short-bus rider actually pony up $25 from his govt check?

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    God you are a fucking moron.

    It is amazing at times.
    Agreed. Care to discuss what I said that's wrong?
    Sure. Pay Derek first.

    I did in April. Didn't think you actually had a coherent response.
    @DerekJohnson true? Did our little short-bus rider actually pony up $25 from his govt check?

    Wam. We've been over this. The year prior I donated $50 I think.
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,978
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    God you are a fucking moron.

    It is amazing at times.
    Agreed. Care to discuss what I said that's wrong?
    Sure. Pay Derek first.

    I did in April. Didn't think you actually had a coherent response.
    @DerekJohnson true? Did our little short-bus rider actually pony up $25 from his govt check?

    Wam. We've been over this. The year prior I donated $50 I think.
    Ha! Figures...'I donated way back when but it should still count...'

    Pony up, SPAMMER.

    HondoFS...
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:


    That's funny
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
    God you are a fucking moron.

    It is amazing at times.
    Agreed. Care to discuss what I said that's wrong?
    Sure. Pay Derek first.

    I did in April. Didn't think you actually had a coherent response.
    @DerekJohnson true? Did our little short-bus rider actually pony up $25 from his govt check?

    Wam. We've been over this. The year prior I donated $50 I think.
    Ha! Figures...'I donated way back when but it should still count...'

    Pony up, SPAMMER.

    HondoFS...
    You can't even read. I'm not gonna translate it for you.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    Sledog said:


    That's funny
    Didn’t Kavanaugh play a large role in Ken starr’s Lewinsky witch hunt? Now his sick sex life is on trial?

    That’s funny.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,202

    Sledog said:


    That's funny
    Didn’t Kavanaugh play a large role in Ken starr’s Lewinsky witch hunt? Now his sick sex life is on trial?

    That’s funny.
    How was it a witch hunt?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,838 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:


    That's funny
    Didn’t Kavanaugh play a large role in Ken starr’s Lewinsky witch hunt? Now his sick sex life is on trial?

    That’s funny.
    Just a liberal (commie) defending a commie. The end justifies the means.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:


    That's funny
    Didn’t Kavanaugh play a large role in Ken starr’s Lewinsky witch hunt? Now his sick sex life is on trial?

    That’s funny.
    How was it a witch hunt?
    Is history lost on you? They spent years investigation Bill on other shit and accidentally stumbled into the Monica thing.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,779 Founders Club
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Talking point

    Yeah MSNBC was rehashing the Clinton investigation this morning.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,202
    edited September 2018
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:


    That's funny
    Didn’t Kavanaugh play a large role in Ken starr’s Lewinsky witch hunt? Now his sick sex life is on trial?

    That’s funny.
    How was it a witch hunt?
    Is history lost on you? They spent years investigation Bill on other shit and accidentally stumbled into the Monica thing.
    Here's the problem for you Hondo. I actually know the history and not just the "talking points" you've been spoon fed. They didn't stumble onto the "Monica thing." Monica who has been subpoenaed in the Paula Jones matter filed a false affidavit where she claimed that she had never had a sexual relationship with the President. That perjury was made known to the SP and Janet Reno gave permission to Starr to expand his investigation into that area since part of what they were dealing with already in the Whitewater investigation was the Clinton's getting people to file bogus affidavits and to perjury themselves.

    The "witch hunt" by Starr, resulted in the convictions of 14 people including the sitting Governor of Arkansas.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited September 2018
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:


    That's funny
    Didn’t Kavanaugh play a large role in Ken starr’s Lewinsky witch hunt? Now his sick sex life is on trial?

    That’s funny.
    How was it a witch hunt?
    Is history lost on you? They spent years investigation Bill on other shit and accidentally stumbled into the Monica thing.
    Here's the problem for you Hondo. I actually know the history and not just the "talking points" you've been spoon fed. They didn't stumble onto the "Monica thing." Monica who has been subpoenaed in the Paula Jones matter filed a false affidavit where she claimed that she had never had a sexual relationship with the President. That perjury was made known to the SP and Janet Reno gave permission to Starr to expand his investigation into that area since part of what they were dealing with already in the Whitewater investigation was the Clinton's getting people to file bogus affidavits and to perjury themselves.

    The "witch hunt" by Starr, resulted in the convictions of 14 people including the sitting Governor of Arkansas.
    Is that like the "witch hunt" by Mueller that's resulted in how many guilty pleas and indictments?

    That being said, what I said is factually correct. I do enjoy your new found support for the Mueller investigation tho.
Sign In or Register to comment.