Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.
There is only one definition of capitalism.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.
There is only one definition of capitalism.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention? Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.
There is only one definition of capitalism.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention? Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake and for no other reason. You're just a common punk. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music.
Do you keep a photograph of Xi Jinping in your wallet?
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.
There is only one definition of capitalism.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention? Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music.
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.
There is only one definition of capitalism.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention? Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music.
Capitalists don’t need protection.
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.
There is only one definition of capitalism.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention? Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music.
Capitalists don’t need protection.
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.
Trade flows are not the result of comparative advantage? You call yourself a capitalist? Please elaborate...
Cirrho would rather see the US take it up the butt from China than dare to ever call them out on their nasty trade practices and even the playing field. He likes it when Europe, Canada and Mexico get in on the gang bang.
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.
There is only one definition of capitalism.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention? Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music.
Capitalists don’t need protection.
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.
Trade flows are not the result of comparative advantage? You call yourself a capitalist? Please elaborate...
So then you’re for Trump? His stated goal is no tariffs.
The US has always led and dominated global trade. Profited hugely from it too. The most highly educated and skilled always win. US global economic dominance for the past 70 years, up until now, regardless of politics, has been built upon open markets and free trade.
Now, in 2018, the US needs to proceed through a generation of useless unskilled labor. Demographics need not be mentioned, but we all know. We told you 20 years go back to tech school. You didn’t listen. Good news! We have a program for you. It’s called welfare. Get used to it because even with your obese orangutan leader, you still cannot impede the laws of economics and capitalism.
The US has always led and dominated global trade. Profited hugely from it too. The most highly educated and skilled always win. US global economic dominance for the past 70 years, up until now, regardless of politics, has been built upon open markets and free trade.
Now, in 2018, the US needs to proceed through a generation of useless unskilled labor. Demographics need not be mentioned, but we all know. We told you 20 years go back to tech school. You didn’t listen. Good news! We have a program for you. It’s called welfare. Get used to it because even with your obese orangutan leader, you still cannot impede the laws of economics and capitalism.
Free trade is fine. When other countries play by the rules. They aren't. That's what you're not getting, and you're too thick to see that tariffs are a great way to bring these trade abusers to the table.
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.
There is only one definition of capitalism.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention? Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music.
Capitalists don’t need protection.
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.
Trade flows are not the result of comparative advantage? You call yourself a capitalist? Please elaborate...
So then you’re for Trump? His stated goal is no tariffs.
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.
There is only one definition of capitalism.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention? Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music.
Capitalists don’t need protection.
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.
Trade flows are not the result of comparative advantage? You call yourself a capitalist? Please elaborate...
So then you’re for Trump? His stated goal is no tariffs.
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
Tariffs are a negotiating tool. Nothing moar, nothing less.
However, if you believe that our current trade relationship with China is level, I guess I’m not surprised.
You also believe that allowing a free flow of desparate people with fake SSN’s to work for 55 cents on the dollar is good business too.
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Is it supposed to be balanced? Do tariffs have a track record of correcting trade imbalances?
Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Is it supposed to be balanced? Do tariffs have a track record of correcting trade imbalances?
Comments
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention?
Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake and for no other reason. You're just a common punk. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music.
Do you keep a photograph of Xi Jinping in your wallet?
Now, in 2018, the US needs to proceed through a generation of useless unskilled labor. Demographics need not be mentioned, but we all know. We told you 20 years go back to tech school. You didn’t listen. Good news! We have a program for you. It’s called welfare. Get used to it because even with your obese orangutan leader, you still cannot impede the laws of economics and capitalism.
However, if you believe that our current trade relationship with China is level, I guess I’m not surprised.
You also believe that allowing a free flow of desparate people with fake SSN’s to work for 55 cents on the dollar is good business too.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/mccain-and-the-pow-cover-up/
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-45674261