OFFICIAL John McCain Imminent Couch Sale Thread
Comments
-
Trump is imposing tariffs. HTH.USMChawk said:
So then you’re for Trump? His stated goal is no tariffs.CirrhosisDawg said:
Trade flows are not the result of comparative advantage? You call yourself a capitalist? Please elaborate...USMChawk said:
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.CirrhosisDawg said:
Capitalists don’t need protection.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.CirrhosisDawg said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.CirrhosisDawg said:
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention?
Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music. -
CirrhosisDawg said:
Trump is imposing tariffs. HTH.USMChawk said:
So then you’re for Trump? His stated goal is no tariffs.CirrhosisDawg said:
Trade flows are not the result of comparative advantage? You call yourself a capitalist? Please elaborate...USMChawk said:
They need protection from politicians who care more about special interest money than they do about their constituents. Our trade imbalance is not the result of capitalism, it’s the result of bribed politicians.CirrhosisDawg said:
Capitalists don’t need protection.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You don't have a valid argument with tariffs unless they are intended to be permanent. They aren't. I'm hearing that tweeting opinions about the FED's policy is the same as socialist intervention. I'm also hearing our trading partners haven't been taking advantage of our shitty trade agreements with them for decades. Wait... nevermind.CirrhosisDawg said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Where's the socialist intervention? Trump has slashed regulation and taxes. Tariffs are not intended to be permanent. They're a temporary negotiating tool. If they were you might have a case, but they're not.CirrhosisDawg said:
There is only one definition of capitalism.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Soros globalism = capitalism to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
I enjoy reading you & @USMChawk (and your fellow travelers) defending socialist intervention as capitalism. And then call yourselves capitalists.
Trump loves the poorly educated.
Did you get your GED yet?
Socialist intervention?
Tariffs, brow beating the fed, brow beating our trading partners & trade protectionism. Read up on it. It’s right out of the liberal socialist playbook. Trump is a fellow traveler and you dumbfucks support it.
You're against winning. You go against the grain for its own sake, and for no other reason. It explains your silly policy viewpoints as well as your crappy taste in music. -
Tariffs are a negotiating tool. Nothing moar, nothing less.CirrhosisDawg said:
Why can’t you see what capitalism is? You know, the free flow of capital, goods, labor and money? It’s not complicated. Except for those unwilling or unable to see what’s right in front of them.USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
Trump is not a “conservative.” He’s a big government, deficit spending, tax and spend liberal.
However, if you believe that our current trade relationship with China is level, I guess I’m not surprised.
You also believe that allowing a free flow of desparate people with fake SSN’s to work for 55 cents on the dollar is good business too.
-
This thread is hot sweaty swamp ass AIDS.
-
Is it supposed to be balanced? Do tariffs have a track record of correcting trade imbalances?USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
-
-
He's not in Arizona anymoreDude61 said:
-
That’s some dark shit dude.Dude61 said: -
I've never been a McCaine fan because of the POW shit.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/mccain-and-the-pow-cover-up/ -
Yes.dflea said:
Is it supposed to be balanced? Do tariffs have a track record of correcting trade imbalances?USMChawk said:Capitalism never would have allowed the trade imbalance to get as out of whack as it did. Special interest groups have stepped in and superseded capitalism . Tariffs are a means to undo that damage.
It’s like trying to get a colorblind man to read the numbers. It’s right fucking there, why can’t you see it?
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-45674261 -
2001400ex said:PurpleThrobber said:
I'd take Sarah Palin in an LBD with plunging neckline, too.dnc said:Made Sarah Palin relevant but otherwise McCain was a dude I always respected, if not always agreed with.
Our country needs more like him.
whynotboth.gif?
WOOD
Dgaf who she really is
