Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This ones going to be hard for some of you to answer

1…7891012

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    The more I dig into it the more I see NevadaSeaver's poont.

    First four years Bellotti was 17-15 in conference. Pete is 23-13.

    One win a year better at tops!

    And remember, poor Mike only inherited a conference champion while lucky Pete inherited a sixth place team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,551 Founders Club
    I'm hearing Pete only had the success he had because of Sark's recruits.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,676
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    I'm hearing Pete only had the success he had because of Sark's recruits.

    house that sark built

    I stand by it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    Fenderbender123 said:

    Here's an ever harder question for Duck fans to answer:

    If winning a national championship was so much easier before the BCS and CFB Playoff era, how come Oregon didn't win any?

    Oregon sucked at football for 100 years. The vast majority of that was before any of us were born so who gives a fuck? Pretty sure that’s been established. What’s that got to do with Peterson winning anything now?

    You ask a great question though, had anyone on this board ever made that claim about any of it being easy. We all know “it’s hard”

    That said, you have to win two games against top 4 teams to win it now instead of waiting for the assistant athletic directors and USA Today columnists to vote based on highlights from ESPN or reading the newspaper game write ups in 1958.

    You’re getting pretty far off track now. Try sticking to the subject.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    dnc said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.

    He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.

    YRYK

    Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.

    Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.

    Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.

    Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.

    So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
    Sorry, forgot to say that I said he’s 1 game better than Bellotti, tops.

    If Bellotti wins one more game a season here and there he would have won the conf a couple more times.

    Mike lost a ton of bowl games too. Especially to good teams.

    That is not me backing Mediocre Mike, and it’s not me saying he should have won a couple more... that’s me duck splaing to you who Peterson is.

    Make's fun of doogs for comparing Cristoball to Sark

    Equates Petermen to Bellotti.
    You’re right. Bellotti actually won a BCS game at Oregon. Even though those don’t count anymore or something?

    Losing bigger games in 2018 > winning them in the past.

    Love watching you all screw yourselves into the ground with all of the twisting. Spending 15 years saying one thing then having to change your entire foundation in 2 is quite a tasty treat.

    3 years tells you who you are
    Win or GTFO
    Seamen covered monitors when Oregon lost to standford every other year or twice in the final.

    Now you wouldn’t trade losing to Alabama for a Rose Bowl victory over Ped State (which you could have corrected the next year but didn’t)

    Wonderful stuff.



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,424 Founders Club
    Mike's upset again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    haie said:

    Mike's upset again.

    Great thread. Great thread views. I’m a pig in shit right now.

    As you were...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,424 Founders Club
    Mike's upset again.
    MikeSeaver said:

    haie said:

    Mike's upset again.

    Great thread. Great thread views. I’m a pig in shit right now.

    As you were...
    (
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,280
    dnc said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    dnc said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    I swear to god and on my twins lives that if Oregon tried to get Peterson tomorrow I would be disappointed and underwhelmed. Already know what he is. Can’t believe some of you think he’s special.

    He’s honestly about 1 win better a year than Bellotti. Tops.

    YRYK

    Bellotti won a ten team conference 1.3 times in 14 years.

    Petersen has won a 12 team conference once in 4 years.

    Bellotti finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 14 years.

    Petersen has finished in the top 5 of the rankings once in 4 years.

    So far Petersen has failed to surpass Bellotti's accomplishments. There's no reason to think he ever will.
    “Did Bellotti ever have to Face a Clay Helton led USC? I didn’t think so.”

    This conference. Ha ha ha.
    John Robinson Round Two and Paul Hackett say hi.

    Or to put them on equal terms, in Bellotti's first four years at Oregon USC won the conference (actually tied for it) once. They finished ranked once (12th). Bellotti won the conference zero out of four times.

    In Pete's first four years at Washington USC won the conference once (outright). They finished ranked three times (20th, 3rd, 12th). Pete won the conference one out of four times.

    Clearly a down USC is the source of Pete's comparative strength.

    Bellotti wins again!
    chinned for showing the proper amount of respect.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter