Should open socialists be banned from holding high office?

oregonblitzkrieg

Yes

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

OBK wants the internet to be regulated by the FCC as a public utility.

Such irony.

Stick with your blunt circus hoe act. That's your wheelhouse. Critical thinking isn't.

Of course a facist like you would want to dictate what I can and cannot say.

Ok, guy who wants to ban Hondo

Southerndawg

HardlyClothed said:

The DSA are essentially new deal democrats you paranoid moron

PurpleJ

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

OBK wants the internet to be regulated by the FCC as a public utility.

Such irony.

Stick with your blunt circus hoe act. That's your wheelhouse. Critical thinking isn't.

Of course a facist like you would want to dictate what I can and cannot say.

Ok, guy who wants to ban Hondo

Ritualistic sacrifice is a big part of my religion. Please try to be more tolerant.

oregonblitzkrieg

Yes

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

OBK wants the internet to be regulated by the FCC as a public utility.

Such irony.

Stick with your blunt circus hoe act. That's your wheelhouse. Critical thinking isn't.

Of course a facist like you would want to dictate what I can and cannot say.

Ok, guy who wants to ban Hondo

Ritualistic sacrifice is a big part of my religion. Please try to be more tolerant.

pawz

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

OBK wants the internet to be regulated by the FCC as a public utility.

Such irony.

Stick with your blunt circus hoe act. That's your wheelhouse. Critical thinking isn't.

Of course a facist like you would want to dictate what I can and cannot say.

Ok, guy who wants to ban Hondo

If banning that worthless faggot shill is wrong, I don't want to be right.

PurpleJ

I just want OBK to come out and admit that he's a socialist Bernie bro.

YellowSnow

No

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

Nope that would be unconstitutional. Only disqualifier is treason.

You also have to meet age, citizenship, and residency requirements. But still.

My point is correct regardless.

You know who bans other parties? Nazis. That's who.

oregonblitzkrieg

Yes

YellowSnow said:

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

Nope that would be unconstitutional. Only disqualifier is treason.

You also have to meet age, citizenship, and residency requirements. But still.

My point is correct regardless.

You know who bans other parties? Nazis. That's who.

It's not that black and white. Germany bans the Nazi party. Don't twist, not saying its a free society under Merkel, but they aren't Nazis either.

PurpleJ

oregonblitzkrieg said:

YellowSnow said:

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

Nope that would be unconstitutional. Only disqualifier is treason.

You also have to meet age, citizenship, and residency requirements. But still.

My point is correct regardless.

You know who bans other parties? Nazis. That's who.

It's not that black and white. Germany bans the Nazi party. Don't twist, not saying its a free society under Merkel, but they aren't Nazis either.

It will be back any day now that they are out in the first round of the WC.

oregonblitzkrieg

Yes

If you're going to let Nazis, communists and socialists hold office, there has to be a mechanism for removing them from power wholesale, simultaneously, or it's just not viable. I can't see Nazis or communists ever being supported by the majority in the country, but I can see it happening with socialists. It's like letting a bunch of cobras sleep in your bed and hoping you don't get bitten.

PurpleJ

LOL at blitz thinking we don't already have a bunch of socialists and communists in office. What country have you been in for the last 100 years?

Southerndawg

YellowSnow said:

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

Nope that would be unconstitutional. Only disqualifier is treason.

You also have to meet age, citizenship, and residency requirements. But still.

My point is correct regardless.

You know who bans other parties? Nazis. That's who.

Yes, you are correct, italian socialists, german socialists, russian socialists, chinese socialists, cuban socialists, and venezuelan socialists, have all banned other parties.

dflea

MikeDamone said:

No.

No one should be. KKK, Nation of Islam, Nazis, communists, fascists, Black Panthers, Retards, Maxine waters, No one should be prohibited.

Damone supports your right to hold high office, obk.

YellowSnow

No

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

Nope that would be unconstitutional. Only disqualifier is treason.

You also have to meet age, citizenship, and residency requirements. But still.

My point is correct regardless.

You know who bans other parties? Nazis. That's who.

Yes, you are correct, italian socialists, german socialists, russian socialists, chinese socialists, cuban socialists, and venezuelan socialists, have all banned other parties.

Exactly. Banning other parties is for fascists, communists, and other losers in general. We don't need to emulate.

oregonblitzkrieg

Yes

PurpleJ said:

LOL at blitz thinking we don't already have a bunch of socialists and communists in office. What country have you been in for the last 100 years?

Only Pumper calls me that.

PurpleJ

oregonblitzkrieg said:

PurpleJ said:

LOL at blitz thinking we don't already have a bunch of socialists and communists in office. What country have you been in for the last 100 years?

Only Pumper calls me that.

I am Pumper. Dumbass.

oregonblitzkrieg

Yes

So the majority doesn't think banning socialists is a good idea. Ok. How do you deal with them then? Because no one in their right mind wants those fucks running the country in the future. It would be the end of America. The alternative is to dismantle and rebuild the broken education system that failed to educate them about the evils of Marxism/socialism/communism. Trump getting to name another justice to the court will go a long way in pre-emptively breaking the legs of the next generation so that it will be more difficult for them to get these filthy systems of oppression and failure off the ground. It's all about stopping millennials from acting on the ignorance they were taught by their predecessors, Gen X and the baby boomers.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

No

No, but you can't have it both ways and ban alt right parties because they hurt snowflake feelers.

UWhuskytskeet

No

allpurpleallgold

oregonblitzkrieg said:

So the majority doesn't think banning socialists is a good idea. Ok. How do you deal with them then? Because no one in their right mind wants those fucks running the country in the future. It would be the end of America. The alternative is to dismantle and rebuild the broken education system that failed to educate them about the evils of Marxism/socialism/communism. Trump getting to name another justice to the court will go a long way in pre-emptively breaking the legs of the next generation so that it will be more difficult for them to get these filthy systems of oppression and failure off the ground. It's all about stopping millennials from acting on the ignorance they were taught by their predecessors, Gen X and the baby boomers.

Dubya was the end of America. Obama was the end of America. Trump is the end of America. Now universal healthcare will bring us to our knees. Dubya was a nazi. Obama was a nazi. Trump is a nazi. Now paying for college is the same as gassing Jews.

And we don’t give a shit about the Supreme Court. We’ll just amend the constitution.