Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sam "Boston Lager" Adams, 4* 2020 RB, Bellevue (Eastside Catholic), WA (COMMITTED)

11719212223

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,127
    Recruits don’t often come to a school for a position coach. It’s part of it and being a good salesman does help.

    The need to care so much about position coaches is baffling. It’s mostly made up bullshit.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    KB’s RBs are fine but let’s not act like we are RB fucking U or something.

    Did you know Bama has had 9 RBs drafted in last 9 years?

    Ingram
    Richardson
    Lacy
    Yeldon
    Henry
    Drake
    Scarborough
    Jacobs
    Harris

    LSU 6 in last 7 including Fournette and Guice.

    Nobody is acting like we are RBU. It’s just not a problematic position. If Bama or Saquan Barkley is the standard, then we suck at almost every position. Gaskin was a favorite but he’s behind those guys too.

    I simply think Newton is going to be very good. Ahmed has played well the last two games too. Sunday will be a monster too. You guys are too stuck on ratings. Good players are good players and we have them at RB.
    Good rb get positive yards. I know ground breaking take
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,726 Founders Club

    KB’s RBs are fine but let’s not act like we are RB fucking U or something.

    Did you know Bama has had 9 RBs drafted in last 9 years?

    Ingram
    Richardson
    Lacy
    Yeldon
    Henry
    Drake
    Scarborough
    Jacobs
    Harris

    LSU 6 in last 7 including Fournette and Guice.

    I'd take those Bama backs in a heartbeat at UW.

    Its amazing how few have made a big impact in the NFL

    Running backs in general are less important but still
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,844

    KB’s RBs are fine but let’s not act like we are RB fucking U or something.

    Did you know Bama has had 9 RBs drafted in last 9 years?

    Ingram
    Richardson
    Lacy
    Yeldon
    Henry
    Drake
    Scarborough
    Jacobs
    Harris

    LSU 6 in last 7 including Fournette and Guice.

    I'd take those Bama backs in a heartbeat at UW.

    Its amazing how few have made a big impact in the NFL

    Running backs in general are less important but still
    I know you're being sarkastic, but those running backs don't have any college eligibility left.
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    If I recall the TBSer standard for how good a coach is at recruiting is how well they get their top targets, not how well they coach up the guys they do get. Don't think this thread needs any more aids on that topic.

    I'm happy to get Sam Adams.
  • RealRhino
    RealRhino Member Posts: 615

    KB’s RBs are fine but let’s not act like we are RB fucking U or something.

    Did you know Bama has had 9 RBs drafted in last 9 years?

    Ingram
    Richardson
    Lacy
    Yeldon
    Henry
    Drake
    Scarborough
    Jacobs
    Harris

    LSU 6 in last 7 including Fournette and Guice.

    Nobody is acting like we are RBU. It’s just not a problematic position. If Bama or Saquan Barkley is the standard, then we suck at almost every position. Gaskin was a favorite but he’s behind those guys too.

    I simply think Newton is going to be very good. Ahmed has played well the last two games too. Sunday will be a monster too. You guys are too stuck on ratings. Good players are good players and we have them at RB.
    Not really. I mean they’re decent college backs, but that’s it. I would hope for better if we aspire to reach the CFP level. We should be signing guys at the Charbonnet, Bijan, Milton level. Instead, what do we have? The 6th best RB in the conference?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,127

    KB’s RBs are fine but let’s not act like we are RB fucking U or something.

    Did you know Bama has had 9 RBs drafted in last 9 years?

    Ingram
    Richardson
    Lacy
    Yeldon
    Henry
    Drake
    Scarborough
    Jacobs
    Harris

    LSU 6 in last 7 including Fournette and Guice.

    Nobody is acting like we are RBU. It’s just not a problematic position. If Bama or Saquan Barkley is the standard, then we suck at almost every position. Gaskin was a favorite but he’s behind those guys too.

    I simply think Newton is going to be very good. Ahmed has played well the last two games too. Sunday will be a monster too. You guys are too stuck on ratings. Good players are good players and we have them at RB.
    It’s not a problematic position because there are a million guys that can do fine on a good team with good blocking. Great, we have a couple of them. Maybe. We certainly don’t have a stable.

    But yes Zeke Elliott, Saquon Barkley, Derrick He Ray, Damien Harris, Travis Etienne are the standard. We are trying to win national championships here not lose to Cal.
    Yes, Ahmed and Newton played a large role in that loss.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,127
    Mad_Son said:

    If I recall the TBSer standard for how good a coach is at recruiting is how well they get their top targets, not how well they coach up the guys they do get. Don't think this thread needs any more aids on that topic.

    I'm happy to get Sam Adams.


    Newton wasn’t the first choice, but he was an early offer. We got him and he’s good.

    If he was a 4 or 5 star that was recruited by everyone, this narrative wouldn’t exist or at least would be less of an issue. That’s why it’s stupid. Newton is probably better than a lot of guys you had higher on your wish lists. Spin away.

    Get good players and develop them.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited September 2019

    Mad_Son said:

    If I recall the TBSer standard for how good a coach is at recruiting is how well they get their top targets, not how well they coach up the guys they do get. Don't think this thread needs any more aids on that topic.

    I'm happy to get Sam Adams.


    Newton wasn’t the first choice, but he was an early offer. We got him and he’s good.

    If he was a 4 or 5 star that was recruited by everyone, this narrative wouldn’t exist or at least would be less of an issue. That’s why it’s stupid. Newton is probably better than a lot of guys you had higher on your wish lists. Spin away.

    Get good players and develop them.
    They tend to rated high and are hard to recruit. So having a good recruiter is important to get good players
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    dnc said:

    Mad_Son said:

    If I recall the TBSer standard for how good a coach is at recruiting is how well they get their top targets, not how well they coach up the guys they do get. Don't think this thread needs any more aids on that topic.

    I'm happy to get Sam Adams.


    Newton wasn’t the first choice, but he was an early offer. We got him and he’s good.

    If he was a 4 or 5 star that was recruited by everyone, this narrative wouldn’t exist or at least would be less of an issue. That’s why it’s stupid. Newton is probably better than a lot of guys you had higher on your wish lists. Spin away.

    Get good players and develop them.
    There weren't a number of guys higher than Newton on the wish list because there weren't any RBs on the west coast that year.

    Newton isn't the problem.

    The problem, if there is one, is that Boner consistently doesn't want to go toe to toe with the heavyweights for the best guys. I think it's fair to say he's lazy.

    Giving up on Austin Jones when we did was indefensible, especially when he couldn't close Charbonnet.

    Running back is a highly overrated position anyway so this is mostly wasted hysteria. But you'd still rather get the best guys, and Boner doesn't appear willing to do what it takes to do that.

    He's a good RB coach though, but again, RB coach is a highly overrated position.
    I guess to a degree but at the same time when I see how USC's running backs can change the game with literally ever rock they carry I know that having a top quality running back is incredibly valuable. It's weird to me how USC constantly recruits top running backs and then barely uses them as they make every game plan their QB and young receivers. I'd simply hand off to guys like Carr 30 times a game.
  • OneNipple
    OneNipple Member Posts: 186


    I guess to a degree but at the same time when I see how USC's running backs can change the game with literally ever rock they carry I know that having a top quality running back is incredibly valuable. It's weird to me how USC constantly recruits top running backs and then barely uses them as they make every game plan their QB and young receivers. I'd simply hand off to guys like Carr 30 times a game.

    Hit Pete up...maybe you can apply or at least drop your knowledge into the suggestion box.
  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    If a player can get the rock 15-25 times a game in their hands ... Is that overrated? If they are good?
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    animate said:

    If a player can get the rock 15-25 times a game in their hands ... Is that overrated? If they are good?

    Running back success or failure is determined more by a) the offensive line and b) the formations/play-calling than it is by the running back.

    I'm not claiming RBs don't matter. I don't believe that. I am saying that they typically get more credit and blame than they deserve.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    Great running backs can cover for other deficiencies and save your ass in games where the offense isn't working otherwise. They are important to most great teams.

    Polk, Sankey, or Gaskin would be making plays right now that extend drives and result in points. Instead we have a crew of guys who each have enough ability to take advantage of good blocking and timely play calls. None of them are making things happen on their own, its missed, and it will continue to be missed.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    chuck said:

    Great running backs can cover for other deficiencies and save your ass in games where the offense isn't working otherwise. They are important to most great teams.

    Polk, Sankey, or Gaskin would be making plays right now that extend drives and result in points. Instead we have a crew of guys who each have enough ability to take advantage of good blocking and timely play calls. None of them are making things happen on their own, its missed, and it will continue to be missed.

    I love all three of those guys very much but only Polk was extremely highly recruited and he wasn't recruited as a RB.

    And none of them have done anything in the NFL (obviously still hoping Gaskin does).

    We'd be better with one of them starting this year, don't twist, but they kind of prove the point I'm making. Having a Napolean Kauffman or a Corey Dillon is fucking awesome, but those guys are rare and you can win (bigly) without them.

    I'd like an RB coach who is at least willing to swing for the fences with those kinds of guys though.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    chuck said:

    Great running backs can cover for other deficiencies and save your ass in games where the offense isn't working otherwise. They are important to most great teams.

    Polk, Sankey, or Gaskin would be making plays right now that extend drives and result in points. Instead we have a crew of guys who each have enough ability to take advantage of good blocking and timely play calls. None of them are making things happen on their own, its missed, and it will continue to be missed.

    I love all three of those guys very much but only Polk was extremely highly recruited and he wasn't recruited as a RB.

    And none of them have done anything in the NFL (obviously still hoping Gaskin does).

    We'd be better with one of them starting this year, don't twist, but they kind of prove the point I'm making. Having a Napolean Kauffman or a Corey Dillon is fucking awesome, but those guys are rare and you can win (bigly) without them.

    I'd like an RB coach who is at least willing to swing for the fences with those kinds of guys though.
    Good point. The three guys I mentioned were all lucky grabs as recruits since they were all way better than their ratings or offers would've indicated.

    On the other hand, Polk was a fast athlete with a frame to carry significant weight. Sankey had elite speed and quickness and was a workhorse to boot, and Gaskin had amazing vision and elusiveness to go with that stout lower body. These were all things plain to see from their HS videos. The only backs on our roster that had eye popping traits as prospects are Salvon, who we knew was a finesse back who would struggle in a featured role, and a true freshman. The rest are solid role players but there's not one among them that anyone expected to carry the offense at any point. I think it's wrong to argue that the talent level is not below what we should aim for and expect.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    KB’s RBs are fine but let’s not act like we are RB fucking U or something.

    Did you know Bama has had 9 RBs drafted in last 9 years?

    Ingram
    Richardson
    Lacy
    Yeldon
    Henry
    Drake
    Scarborough
    Jacobs
    Harris

    LSU 6 in last 7 including Fournette and Guice.

    Nobody is acting like we are RBU. It’s just not a problematic position. If Bama or Saquan Barkley is the standard, then we suck at almost every position. Gaskin was a favorite but he’s behind those guys too.

    I simply think Newton is going to be very good. Ahmed has played well the last two games too. Sunday will be a monster too. You guys are too stuck on ratings. Good players are good players and we have them at RB.
    It’s not a problematic position because there are a million guys that can do fine on a good team with good blocking. Great, we have a couple of them. Maybe. We certainly don’t have a stable.

    But yes Zeke Elliott, Saquon Barkley, Derrick He Ray, Damien Harris, Travis Etienne are the standard. We are trying to win national championships here not lose to Cal.
    Yes, Ahmed and Newton played a large role in that loss.
    Again, they were fine, not spectacular. Cal’s RBs were better. That shouldn’t happen.
  • Beno4Life
    Beno4Life Member Posts: 533
    I thought when we got McGrew it was one of the biggest coups on the West Coast. Same with Wattenburg.

    I've liked McGrew this year, but he can also just be a JAG back there, too. What really saddens me is that we have another year of him returning kickoffs. Nothing dynamic there, a la Fuller.
  • Jnewblud
    Jnewblud Member Posts: 36
    Can't wait to see this kid in action for the Huskies!
  • sinceredawg
    sinceredawg Member Posts: 834
    Dissin Adams over on the DM.c bored, sayin he's not even getting touches?