The truth about Pete: He wants to be a team with inferior athletes that outsmarts everyone
Comments
-
Dennis_DeYoung said:
If Pete had his way every recruit would be BBK. If we didn't have to play the games, Pete's whole classes would be BBK and Jakey B.uzi said:I'm curious if our latest commit fits the narrative of "an inferior athlete that will outsmart everyone"...
Sad for Pete, because we have to play games and he's competitive, he's forced into acknowledging that we need talent. But he doesn't like it.
-
Fuck, I wish I was still back in the land of 18 year old tail...I get PAID to surf these shit boreds!DerekJohnson said:I'm just honored that Wagon would apparently take time away from his ethnic studies lecture and risk the wrath of his Marxist professor in order to surf the boards at Hardcore Husky. #Grateful
-
And Pumpy predicts a Sark like 9-4 record this year (including, presumably, a bowl victory against a shit mid-major or Big 10 underachiever)puppylove_sugarsteel said:So you all, not just Chuckwagon Dan know, every one of Pete's classes were far and away better than any one of Snark's.
Pete said day 1 it would take 18 months to repair Sarks fucking pathetic roster. He was pretty damn accurate. Most You all jumped off wagon after Pete's 1st year , the rest besides Pup, Bates and Steel2, did after year 2.
Denny jumped off, back on after pac champ then back off after loss to bama, back on before PSU game then off after the game...see where I'm going? How bout a quick analogy. Like the DOW, best not to sell with every trump negative headline (Pete loss)...stick with Trumps (pete's) process and you'll be heavily rewarded...even after a 2000pt dip (7pt loss to PSU)
You fickle fucktards here...bunch of pansy ass bears' -
I get what Dennis is saying. He's right in the sense that we aren't there yet and we don't have the depth or athletes that are considered elite. Part of it is Browning but part of it is the try hard decent but not fast or elite guys starting or in heavy rotation.
Caveats are he's done a good job getting us to this point. I'm happy with the job he has done. I just hope he realizes the try hard three stars are, for the most part, not going to win a playoff. -
On the rag again I seeTequilla said:
Go back to giving a shit about Tennessee under Butch Davis ... that’s more your speedDerekJohnson said:Pete is wonderful but Dennis makes some points. The K-State comparison doesn’t work. But for the foreseeable future I see us now as UCLA under Terry Donahue.
And it was Butch Jones. HTH -
Lol! Thx. I was wondering what in the fuck was talking about.DerekJohnson said:
On the rag again I seeTequilla said:
Go back to giving a shit about Tennessee under Butch Davis ... that’s more your speedDerekJohnson said:Pete is wonderful but Dennis makes some points. The K-State comparison doesn’t work. But for the foreseeable future I see us now as UCLA under Terry Donahue.
And it was Butch Jones. HTH -
Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I get what Dennis is saying. He's right in the sense that we aren't there yet and we don't have the depth or athletes that are considered elite. Part of it is Browning but part of it is the try hard decent but not fast or elite guys starting or in heavy rotation.
Caveats are he's done a good job getting us to this point. I'm happy with the job he has done. I just hope he realizes the try hard three stars are, for the most part, not going to win a playoff.
Uh, think Pete coulda stayed in Boise if all he wanted was a team full of BBKs?
Try this: Name one recruiting-related decision Pete has made in the last 24 months that supports DdY’s claim. -
Or, of the 5 white guys we took last year (Sirmon, Sirmon, Osborne, Yankoff, and Bynum), which ones meet the criteria of being an "under-achieving, try-hard" that Pete is supposedly trying to fill the team with?TTJ said:Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I get what Dennis is saying. He's right in the sense that we aren't there yet and we don't have the depth or athletes that are considered elite. Part of it is Browning but part of it is the try hard decent but not fast or elite guys starting or in heavy rotation.
Caveats are he's done a good job getting us to this point. I'm happy with the job he has done. I just hope he realizes the try hard three stars are, for the most part, not going to win a playoff.
Uh, think Pete coulda stayed in Boise if all he wanted was a team full of BBKs?
Try this: Name one recruiting-related decision Pete has made in the last 24 months that supports DdY’s claim. -
I think you mean "over-achieving", but the poont stands.bananasnblondes said:
Or, of the 5 white guys we took last year (Sirmon, Sirmon, Osborne, Yankoff, and Bynum), which ones meet the criteria of being an "under-achieving, try-hard" that Pete is supposedly trying to fill the team with?TTJ said:Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I get what Dennis is saying. He's right in the sense that we aren't there yet and we don't have the depth or athletes that are considered elite. Part of it is Browning but part of it is the try hard decent but not fast or elite guys starting or in heavy rotation.
Caveats are he's done a good job getting us to this point. I'm happy with the job he has done. I just hope he realizes the try hard three stars are, for the most part, not going to win a playoff.
Uh, think Pete coulda stayed in Boise if all he wanted was a team full of BBKs?
Try this: Name one recruiting-related decision Pete has made in the last 24 months that supports DdY’s claim. -
If Pete could find a way to inject everyone with 60% more whiteness than they currently have, he would do it. Even BBK.
