Snowflakes

creepycoug

TurdBuffer said:

Straights must bake cakes and arrange flowers for fags.
Fags get to say "no coffee for you" to Christians.
https://youtu.be/FRUJmGzV9Ko
Some rights are clearly more equal than others.

What's your point? That there are retarded morons who can't see that as a problem? Yes, there are. There are as many or more retards who support the Christian bakers, and I suspect you know that full well.

2001400ex

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Swaye said:

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.

Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.

I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".

Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?

I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.

In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.

That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.

Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.

But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.

I think this means you agree with me, but I'm not sure because white man's devil tongue as a second language and all.

Think it's more this

You are smarter than that.

GrundleStiltzkin

2001400ex said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Swaye said:

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.

Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.

I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".

Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?

I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.

In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.

That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.

Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.

But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.

I think this means you agree with me, but I'm not sure because white man's devil tongue as a second language and all.

Think it's more this

You are smarter than that.

Disagree

2001400ex

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.

Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.

I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".

Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?

I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.

In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.

That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.

Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.

But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.

Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.

So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.

GrundleStiltzkin

2001400ex said:

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.

Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.

I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".

Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?

I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.

In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.

That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.

Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.

But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.

Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.

So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.

YBE

creepycoug

2001400ex said:

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.

Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.

I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".

Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?

I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.

In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.

That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.

Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.

But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.

Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.

So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.

That's not what "free market" means.

If I have legal tender and meat basic standards of public decency relative to where I am (I'm appropriately attired for the business setting and not otherwise being disruptive), then that's it. I don't need to qualify according to your biases. I would think this is one thing everyone here could agree upon.

Otherwise, it's "We don't serve Jews." Not gonna happen.

2001400ex

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.

Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.

I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".

Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?

I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.

In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.

That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.

Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.

But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.

Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.

So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.

That's not what "free market" means.

If I have legal tender and meat basic standards of public decency relative to where I am (I'm appropriately attired for the business setting and not otherwise being disruptive), then that's it. I don't need to qualify according to your biases. I would think this is one thing everyone here could agree upon.

Otherwise, it's "We don't serve Jews." Not gonna happen.

Like I said, that's how I am and that's how my burger shack is. If you have money I don't give a flying fuck who you are.

Our country is different than that tho. It wasn't long ago when businesses were FS and could deny someone based on color. That has been fixed fortunately, and we are still wading through the religious/sexual preference issue. That being said, I don't think Dick's and Walmart upping the age to 21 is an issue someone should sue over. It's a money grab that's going to waste a bunch of time and money.

TurdBomber

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.

Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.

I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".

Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?

I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.

In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.

That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.

Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.

But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.

Free market is free market. A business owner has a right to refuse service. I think it's stupid for business owners to deny service based on someone's sexual preference. But I think that's their choice and as long as they are respectful about it, they can be idiots if they choose.

So I agree that picking and choosing your customers is idiotic. But it's also idiotic for people to sue for that shit.

That's not what "free market" means.

If I have legal tender and meat basic standards of public decency relative to where I am (I'm appropriately attired for the business setting and not otherwise being disruptive), then that's it. I don't need to qualify according to your biases. I would think this is one thing everyone here could agree upon.

Otherwise, it's "We don't serve Jews." Not gonna happen.

Wait, you have a problem denying service to Jews?

I thought that was the one thing we could all agree on. Fuck.

TurdBomber

creepycoug said:

TurdBuffer said:

Straights must bake cakes and arrange flowers for fags.
Fags get to say "no coffee for you" to Christians.
https://youtu.be/FRUJmGzV9Ko
Some rights are clearly more equal than others.

What's your point? That there are retarded morons who can't see that as a problem? Yes, there are. There are as many or more retards who support the Christian bakers, and I suspect you know that full well.

If you have to ask what the point is, you don't get it.

dnc

Swaye said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

Swaye said:

creepycoug said:

2001400ex said:

YellowSnow said:

Swaye said:

For those keeping track at home, you do have to bake a cake for gays even if it violates your religious beliefs, but you do NOT have to sell a .22 rifle to a 20 year old even if State and Federal law says they can legally purchase it. Sounds about right. Christ.

Need one of our fake lawyers to weigh in here.

I'm having a hard time squaring this. It would be analogous to a bar or restaurant saying they won't serve someone a beer until they are 24. It's up to the state legislatures and Feds to pass laws regulating firearms, not private business making up their own "law".

Is it kinda like the NBA saying you can't be drafted until you are 19?

I don't know. I think it's fucktarded for a cake baker to deny a gay couple and I think it's equally fucktarded for the gay couple to give a shit when there's 50 other people who can bake them a cake.

In that same vein, this kid can buy a gun from 50 other places, shut the fuck up and stop wasting government time and money over bullshit.

That was working until you said that. Safeway, all 20 billion of them, will make and sell anyone any cake they want. That's not the point. The point is that, when you are in public commerce, you rely, wittingly or not, on massive amounts of infrastructure common to us all, including the very road to your store. When you hang out a shingle, you serve the public and you don't pick and choose.

Cakes or guns, there's no difference on that score. If one is regulated and the other not, then the same answer, with regulated limitations that are rationally related to some public concern.

But no. Picking and choosing your retail customers isn't going to work. That could get really complicated for everyone real quickly.

I think this means you agree with me, but I'm not sure because white man's devil tongue as a second language and all.

Think it's more this

If @dnc and I ever end our magical love affair, you are the next man up.

Only if you get to him first!